Evaluation of Quinolone Susceptibility in Orthopedic Infections

Kinolonlar, mükemmel biyoyararlanımı olması, toksisitelerinin azlığı ve çoğu Enterobacteriaceae üyesine ve büyük oranda Pseudomonas spp. ve Staphylococcus spp. suçlarına etkisi nedeniyle tedavide sıkça kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada Ankara Onkoloji Hastanesinde Ocak 2005-Eylül 2006 tarihleri arasında ortopedi kliniğinde yatarak ve ayaktan tedavi gören ve infeksiyon hastalıkları bölümünden konsültasyonu istenen hastalardan alınan yara kültürlerinde üreme oranları ve üreyen mikroorganizmaların kinolon duyarlılığı retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Kinolon duyarlılığı 132 mikroorganizmada (%79.04) test edilmiştir. Test edilen tüm mikroorganizmaların 67 (%50.76)'si kinolon duyarlıyken 65 (%49.24)'i dirençliydi. Kinolon duyarlılığı test edilen 81 gram-negatif mikroorganizmanın 37 (%45.68)'si, 51 gram-pozitif mikroorganizmanın da 28 (%54.90)'i kinolon dirençli bulunmuştur. Profilaksiden ampirik tedaviye kadar tüm alanlarda kinolon kullanımının daha dikkatli yapılması direnç oranlarının daha da artmaması açısından önemsenmelidir.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Kinolon, ortopedik infeksiyon.

Ortopedik Yara Kültürlerinde Üreyen Mikroorganizmaların Kinolon Duyarlılığının Değerlendirilmesi

Because of their good bioavailability, minimal toxicity, effect on Enterobacteriaceae (especially on Pseudomonas spp.) and staphylococci quinolones are frequently used in treatment of orthopedic infections. İn this study quinolon susceptibility were evaluated in cultures obtained from orthopedic patients in January 2005-September 2006 period. ûuinolon susceptibility were tested in 132 isolated microorganisms, 67 ofthem (50.76%) were susceptibie and 65 isolates (49.24%) were found to be resistant to quinolons. ûuinolon resistance among gram-negatives was 45.68 percent and in gram-positives ıvas 54.90 percent according to these data approximately half of isolated microorganisms in our study (gram-negative or gram-positive) were resistant against quinolon. Quinolon should be carefully used as empirical prophylactic agent for prevention of increasing resistance.

___

  • Daniel P, Francis A. Use of quinolones in osteomyelitis and infected orthopaedic prosthesis. Druds 1999;Suppl 2:85-91.
  • Fong I, Ledbetter W, Vandenbroucke A, et al. Ciprofloxacin concentrations in bone and muscle after oral dosing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986;29:405-8.
  • Darley E, MacGovvan A. Antibiotic treatment of gram-posi- tive bone and joint infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;53:928-35.
  • Greenberg R, Newman M, Shariaty S, et al. Ciprofloxacin, lomefloxacin or levofloxacin as treatment for chronic osteomyelitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:164-6.
  • Drancourt M, Stein A, Argenson J, et al. Oral treatment of Staphylococcus spp. infected orthopedic implants with fucidic acid or ofloxacin in combination with rifampicin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997;39:235-40.
  • Drancourt M, Stein A, Argenson J, et al. Oral rifampin plus ofloxacin for treatment of Staphylococcus-infected orthope­ dic implants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993:1214-8.
  • Brouqui P, Rousseau M, Stein A, et al. Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected orthopedic prostheses with ceftazidime-ciprofloxacin antibiotic combination. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:2423-5.
  • Gesu G, Marchetti F, Picconi L, et al. Levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in vitro activities against 4003 clinical bacteri- al isoiates collected in 24 Italian laboratoies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:816-9.
  • TrampuzA, VVidmer A. İnfections associated with orthopedic implants. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2006;19:349-56.
  • Bernard L, Hoffmeyer P, Assai M, et al. Trends in the treat­ ment of orthopedic prosthetic infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;53:127-9.
Acta Oncologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 0304-596X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Onkoloji EAH
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Fetal Ouadrigeminal Arachnoid Cyst Secondary to Usage of Valproic Acid

Gülşah Bayram KABAÇAM, Z. Nilgün Yildirim ÖZBAY, Bige SAYIN, Perihan SOYDİNÇ, Doğan DEDE

Management of Menopausal Symptoms in Patients Breast Cancer

Jale METİNDİR

Metachronous Thymoma and Nonsmall Celi Lung Cancer A Case Report

Yeşim ELGİN, Aytül ÖZGEN, Bülent KÜÇÜKPLAKÇI, Ergun SANRI, Cem MISIRLIOĞLU, Taciser DEMİRKASIMOĞLU, V. Işıl UĞUR, Ş. Pınar KARA, Nadi ÖZDAMAR

The Efficacy of US-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Adrenal Masses

Bilgin Kadri ARIBAŞ, Gürbüz DİNGİL, Ümit ÜNGÜL

The Value of A Second Transurethral Resection in Patients with Superficial Bladder Cancer

Fatih HIZLI, Yurdaer KAYNAK, Emine BENZER, Ferhat BERKMEN

A Case Report of Preadolesarıt Tyroglossal Cyst Papillary Carcinoma Established By Tyroglossal Cyst Excision

Oğuz TARCAN, Haluk ULUCANLAR, Aybala AĞAÇ, Suat KUTUN, Necmi YÜCEKULE, Abdullah ÇETİN

Is Minimum 10 Nodes Removed to Correctly Determine The Breast Cancer Patients Who Had Negative Axillary Status Sufficient?

Kaptan GÜLBEN, Mustafa YİĞİT, Uğur BERBEROĞLU

Evaluation of Quinolone Susceptibility in Orthopedic Infections

Kamuran SAYILIR, M. Cihat OĞAN, Gülşen İSKENDER, Müfide ÇİMENTEPE, Yaman KARAKOÇ

Mature Teratoma of the Uterine Cervix

Jale METİNDİR, Zeynep KAHYAOĞLU, Süleyman DEMİR

The Comparison Betvveen 21 G and 22 G Injector Needles in the Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Thyroid Nodules

Bilgin Kadri ARIBAŞ, Dilek Nil ÜNLÜ, Gürbüz DİNGİL, Sevim ÖZDEMİR, Pelin DEMİR, Zekiye Pekol ŞİMŞEK, Ümit ÜNGÜL, Aliye Ceylan ZARALI