___

• Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatoramediaîor distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. journal of Personality and Social Psychology. El, ll73-ll82.
• Borgatta, E. F. ve Sales, R. F. (1953). Interaction of individuals in re— constitued groupsSoeionietry, 16, 302-320.
• Bouchard, T. J., Branden, G. ve Barsaloux, J. (1974). A comparison of individual, subgroup, and total group methods of problem solving.
• journal of Applieil Psyehology, 59, 226-5227.
• Brophy, Dennis. R. (2000). Comparing the attributes, activities, and performanee of onvergent and divergenr thinkers. Paper presented; at the Group Creativity Conference held at The University of Texas at Arlington.
• Brown, V., Tumeo, M., Larey, T. S. ve Paulus, P. B. (i998). Modelling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Green Research, 29, 495-526.
• Camacho, L M. ve Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming.journal of §ersonality and Social Psychology, 68, l0’7l— 1080.
• Collaros, P. A. ve Anderson, L. R. @969). Effect of perceived expertness upon creativity of members of brainstorming groups. Journal of Applieel Psychology, 53, l 59-163.
• Collins, A. M. ve Loftns, E. F. (i975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 40428.
• Connolly, T., Routhieaux, R. L. ve Schneider, S. K. (3993). On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Tests of one underlying mechanism. Small Group Research, 24, 498603.
• Coskun, Haniit. (2000). The effects of onto-groan comparison, social context, intrinsic motivation, ami eolleetive identity in brainstorming groups. Unpuolislied doctoral dissertation. lie University of Texas at Arlington.
• Coskun, H., Paulus, ? B., Brown, V. ve Sherwood, l. l. (2000). Cognitive stimulation andproblein presentation in idea generation groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, anal Pracriee, 4, 307-329.
• Coşkun, Hamit. (baskıda. (a)). Beyin yazımında iraksak düşünme ve grup ortarninin düşünce iiretiinine etkisi (The effect of divergent thinking Wf,“
• l H. Coşkun İraksak Düşünme tve Kategori Yapm‘riml .lreysei Beyin
• and group context on idea generation in brainwriting). Türk Psikeîejâ
• Dergisi (Turkish Jonrnai of Psyciioiogy).
• Coşkun, Hamit. (baskrda(b)). Cognitive stimulation with . convergent and divergent thinking exercises in brainwriting: incubation, sequence priming, and group context. Semir Group Research.
• Dennis, A., Aronson. î ., Heuiuger, B. ve Walker, E, (1996). Task and time decompostition in eiectronic brainstorming. Proceedings of E11388, 11, 51—59.
• Dennis, A. R., Vaiacicii, l. S., Conolly, T. ve Wynne, B. E. (1996). Process Structuring in electronic brainstorming. Inşammation Systems Research, ‘7, 268—277.
• Diehl, M. ve Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the sointion of riddle. .Eonrnai of Fersonaiity and Social Psycnoiogy, 53, 497-509.
• Dielii, M. ve Stroebe, W. (î99î). Productivity ioss in idea generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. journai of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392—493.
• Dngosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J. ve Yang, H. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. ionrnal of Personaiity and Sociai Psyciiology, 79, 722-735.
• Eisenberger, R. ve Armeli, S. 0997). Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest? journal of Personaiity and Sociai Fsychology, 72, 652—663.
• Eisenberger, R., Haskins, F. ve Gambieton, P. (1999). Promised reward and creativity: Effects of prior experience. Journai of Exnerii‘nentai Serie) Psychology, 35, 308—325.
• Eisenberger, R. ve Selbst, M. (1994). Does reward increase or decrease creativity? journai of Personaiity and Social Psychology, 66, 11113 1327.
• Gettys, C. F., Pliske, R, M., Manning, C. ve Casey, J. T. 0987). An evaination of human act generation performance. Grganizational Behavior and Harman Becision Processes, 39, 23—31.
• Harari, 0. ve Graham, W. K. (1975). Task and task consequences as factors in individual and group brainstorming. journal of Sociai Psychology, 95, GE,—65.
• filmin İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Safya Bifiilill’i' Ensliîz'âsz'i E?ergisi ZİHİS—î ( İÜ)
• Hem, E. ( 1993). The inŞnence of modality order anrl break. period on a brainstorming taskşnpnblisned manuscript. The University of Texas at Arlington.
• Janis, irvin L. (1982). Grountliink (Zimî EĞ.), Boston: Houghton MilŞin. (ama, S. .l. ve Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta—analytic review and theoretical integration. lonrnal of Personality anri Social Psychology, 65, 68l—706.
• Kerr, N. L. ve Bruno, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group
• motivation losses. Free—rider effects. Journal of Personality and
• Social Psychology, 44, 78—94.
• Kirma, Micheal. — (1987). Adaptors and innovators: Cognitive style and personality. In S. G. lsaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity researchi beyond the basics (pp. 282—304). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
• Larey, T. 8. ve Panlus, P. B. (1999). Group preference and convergent tendencies in groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 175—184.
• McGlynn, R. P., McGurk, D., Effland, V. S., Jobli, N. L. ve Harding, D. l. (2004). Brainstorming and task performance in groups constrained by evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 75—87.
• Mullen, B., Johnson, C. ve Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta—analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, ]2, 3—24.
• Neely, Jim. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. in Besner, D. ve Humphrey/s, G. W. (Ed.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264—350). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaurn.
• Nemeth, C. l. ve Nemeth—Brown, B. (2003). Better than individuals? The potential benefits of dissent and diversity for group creativity. în P. B. Paulus ve B. A. Nijstad (Eds), Group creativity: innovation through collaboration (pp. 63434). NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
• Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W. ve Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? Eonrnal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 531—548.
• Osborn, Alex. F. (1957). Applied imagination: Frincinles and nrocerlnres of creative problem—sewing, New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons. 4 . “&ch