___

• Andersen, D. S. and Piazza, E. A. (1996). Changing Beliefs: îeacliing and Learning Maihematics in Constructivist Preservice Classrooins. Action in Teacher Education, v.l8, n. 2, s. 51—62.
• Anderson, R. S. (l998). Why Talk About Different Ways to Grade? The Shift from Traditional Assessment to Alternative Assessment, New Directions For Teaching And Learning, v. 74.
• Aguirre, M. (l996). Effect of open—ended questions on Spanish—Dominant kep Students’ ability to demonstrate inwdept science concept development and use sciencetlfic vocablulary. NYSABE lournal. v. ll, s. 46x69.
• Baker, M. &, Hansell, M. H. 2000. “The Relationship between seine psychological factors and their effect on the performance of grid questions and word association tests,” Educational Psychology, c, 20 n. 3, S. 346 — 364.
• 5 S. Ares-S. Kernels”: Farkl (lie/129 Tekniklerinin Lise Öğreiıciierinm Hai-eker...
• Bahar, M. 2091. Çoktan secrneli testlere elestirisel bir yaklasim ve alternatif inetotlar. Kurainda ve Uygnlainada Eğitim Biîimieri. c. l, n. l, s. 25.. 39.
• Bennett, R. E. Rock. D. A... Braun, ll. 1., Erye, D.. and Sophrer, E. (1990). The relationship of expert—system scored constrained free—response items to multiple—choice and open ended items. Applied Psychological Measurement, v. l4, s. 151-162.
• Bridgeman, B. (19891€ Comparative validity of multiple—choice and free response {items on the advenced placement examination in biology. College Board Rep. No. 89—2; ETS RR No. 894. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
• Bridgeman, B. (l992). A comparition of open=ended and multiple-choice question formats for the quantitative section of the graduate record examinations; general test. GRE Board Report No. 8843B Princeton, N. l : Educational Testing Service.
• Bridgeinan, B., & Morgan, R. (1993). Relationships between differential performance on multiple-choice and essay sections of selected AP exams and measures of performance in high school and college. College Board Report No. 94—5, New York: College Entrance Examination Board. (ERİC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 381 554).
• Cataloglu. E. (1996). Promoting teachers” awareness of students’ misconceptions in introductory mechanics. Unpublished Master Thesis, METU. Ankara, Turkey.
• Egan. K. (1972). “Structrul communication »» a new contribution to pedagogy,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology. c. l, s. 63 & 78.
• Farr. B. P. and Trumbull. E. (1997). Assessment Alternatives for Diverse Classrooms. Norwood. Mass: Christopher—Gordon.
• Glaser. R. (1988). Cognitive and Environmental Perspectives on Assessing Achievement. in Assessment in the Service of Learning: Proceedings of the 198.7 ETS invitational Conference, Princeton, NJ Educationrl Testing Service.
• Gomez, M. L... Grane, M. E. and Block, M. N. (1991). Reassessing Portfolio Assessment: Rhetoric and Reality. Language Arts, v. 68, s. 620—628.
• Halpern, D. (1994). Changing College Classrooms: New Teaching and Learning Strategies for an increasingly Complex World. San Francisco: lossey—Bass.
• About İzzet Bayan Üniversitesi Sig/al Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2905-1 (İÜ)
• Hestenes, D, Wells, M., &“Swachhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept inventory. Physics Teacher, 30, 141—153.
• Johnstone, A. H. 1981. “Diagnostic Testing in Science,” In Evaluation Roles in Education, Eds. Lewy, A. And N evo. D. London: Gordon and Breach.
• îohnstone. A. H., Morrison, T. L, and Reid, N. 1981. Chemistry About us.
• London: Heinemann Educational Books.
• McLaughlin, M,» & Vogt, MB. (1996). Portfolios in teacher education. Newwark, DE: International Reading Association.
• O’Neil, H. F. Jr., & Brown, R. S. (1998). Differential effects of question
• “ formats in math assessment on metacognition and affect. Applied in Education, v. l l, n. 4, p. 33l-35l.
• Perrone, V. (1991). Expanding student assessment. Alexandria, VA;
• ssociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Resnick, L B. (1985). instructional psychology. in T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite {Eds}, international encyclopedia of education: Research and studies, vol. 5, pp. 2569—2581. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
• Resnick, L. B. (1987). Constructing knowledge in school. in L. S. Lieben (Ed.), Development and Learning: Conflict or congruence, Hillsdale, NJ :Erlbaum.
• Scottish Exam Board (1997). Hidher Grade Biology Examination Papers. Glasgow: Gibson.
• Shavelson, R. 3., Baxter, (3. P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance Assessment in Science. Applied measurement in Education, V. 4, n. 4, p. 347—362.
• Shuell, Thomas J . (1986). Cognitive Conceptions of Learning. Review of Educational Research Winter, v.56, n. 4, p. 41 1—436.
• Steinberg, R. N., & Sabelle, M. S. (1997). Performance on multiple—choice diagnostics and complementory exam problems. Physics Teacher, v. 35, p. l50~l55. mü i 7 S. Ateş-S, Karaçam
• Farklı Ölçme Tekniklerinin iise Öğrencilerinin Hawke]...
• EEK-1: YlG tablosunun bir bölümü ve YiG'ne ait Örnek bir soru
• — Aşağıda , yut-ay 2n Aşağıdaki Şekilde, sürtünmeli bir egik 3— Aşağıdaki B’aŞk, yatay +
• sürtünm nir düzlem düzlemin tebe noktasından serbest bırakıldıktan siirtiüıimgsjğ bir düzlemde
• uz e hereket etmekte sonra, 5: ir hızla kayan 3 kg kütleli bir hareket etmekte olan bir
• olan bir cismin, konııııı— blok görülmektedir. cismin, konum-zalime
• zaıııaıı gm görülmektedir. grafiğini temsil etmektedir.
• A Konıırnı’ı ıl ııı: îkg Konum (In) mo ; Y _ , A
• q ; Vlem/szSabıt 10 ell ; / 60 $$ (* 15 hlem 10 40 A* 30° 5 f 20 0 E». l _ 3 l 2 3
• Zaman (5) Zaman (sn)
• Sv Aşağıdaki şekilde, 6- Aşağıdaki şekil, yatay düzlemde saöa doğru 7— Aşağıdaki şekilde, 4 kg &
• sı". tüiımesiz bir eğik hareket etmekte olan bir cismin, bir saniye kütleli bir blok, yata ı
• düzlemin tepe noktasından aralıklarla bulunduğu konumları sürtünmesiz bir masa
• serbest bırakıldıktan sonra göstermektedir. _ üzerinde, ağırlıksız bir iple,
• kayan, 4 kg’lık bir cisim sürtünmesiz bir makaradan
• görülmektedir. geçirildikten sonra 6 kg’lık
• m: 4kg bir kütleye bağlanmıştır.
• lıııılııııîııvııı ııı, <1
• 5 lt) 15 20 25m :11: 4 kgI—i 111:6 kg 9- 1i)— ll— 12—
• Soru: Grid tablosundaki kutııeukların h&ııoisinde ve fa hangilerinde cisme eıki' en net kuvvet (Bile ke
• kuvvet) sıfır (Ül’clır? ) V Y ___—_. Ş