Gamze ULAY, M. Oğuz BORAHAN, Filiz NAMDAR PEKİNER, Fatma Güler DÖNMEZ, Ayşe Nur YILDIZ SADIKOĞLU

Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi kullanarak submandibular fossa derinliğinin değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Submandibular fossa (SF) varlığı posterior mandibular bölgeyi özellikle implant tedavisi için önemli bir anatomik bölge haline getirir. Bu nedenle, diş hekimleri tedaviden önce dikkat etmelidirler. Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir grup hastada konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) kullanarak SF derinliğini retrospektif olarak değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, 2013-2016 yılları arasında Marmara Üniversitesi Oral Diagnoz ve Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı’na başvuran ve KIBT çekilerek, resim arşivleme ve iletişim sistemine (PACS) eklenen 300 erişkin hastanın dataları kullanılmıştır. Bilateral SF derinliği KIBT görüntüleri üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir. Derinliğe göre üç farklı SF tipi sınıflandırılmıştır: tip I; konkavite 3 mm. Bulgular: Sağ SF derinliği 143 hastada tip I, 117 hastada tip II ve 38 hastada tip III olarak görülmüştür. Sol SF derinliği 150 hastada tip I, 116 hastada tip II ve 42 hastada tip III olarak görülmüştür. Her iki tarafta tip I SF daha fazla oranda tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç: Olası komplikasyonlar dikkate alındığında, SF derinliğinin preoperatif olarak değerlendirmesi güvenli bir cerrahi için önemlidir. Bu çalışma, KIBT'in bu bölgenin kapsamlı olarak değerlendirmesi için faydalı olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

Assesment of submandibular fossa depth using cone beam computed tomography

Aim: Due to the presence of submandibular fossa (SF), theposterior mandible is an significant anatomic region whichshould be taken into consideration before dental surgery.The aim of this study was to assess the SF depth in a groupof patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)retrospectively.Materials and Methods: The subjects for this retrospectivestudy consisted of all 300 adult patients who visited the department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology at Marmara University, and underwent a single CBCT examination. The CBCTdata were picked up from the picture archiving and communications system (PACS) from the period of 2013 to 2016. Bilateral SF depths were evaluated on CBCT images. Three differentSF types were categorized according amount of depth: type I;concavity depth 3 mm.Results: For the right SF depth measurements, 143 patientswere found to be type I, 117 patients were type II and 38 patients were type III. For the left SF depth measurements, 150patients were type I, 116 patients were type II and 42 patientswere type III. Type I SF depth was more common in both submandibular fossa.Conclusions: Considering the possible complications, preoperative assessment of SF depth is crucial for safe surgery inthe posterior mandible. Use of CBCT enhances comprehensive evaluation of this particular anatomic region.

PDF

___

Kern JS, Kern T, Wolfart S, Heussen N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post-loading implant loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 270: 174-195.
Kamburoğlu K, Acar B, Yüksel S, Paksoy CS. CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients. Surg Radiol Anat 2015; 37: 1209- 1215.
Chan HL, Brooks SL, Fu JH, Yeh CY, Rudek I, Wang HL. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 201-206.
Sammartino G, Prados-Frutos JC, Riccitiello F, Felice P, Cerone V, Gasparro R, Wang HL. The Relevance of the Use of Radiographic Planning in Order to Avoid Complications in Mandibular Implantology: A Retrospective Study. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016: 8175284. doi: 10.1155/2016/8175284.
Balaguer-Martí JC, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Balaguer-Martínez J, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Immediate bleeding complications in dental implants: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015; 20: e231-e238.
Steinberg MJ, Kelly PD. Implant-related nerve injuries. Dent Clin North Am 2015; 59: 357-373.
González-García A, González-García J, Diniz-Freitas M, García-García A, Bullón P Accidental displacement and migration of endosseous implants into adjacent craniofacial structures: a review and update.. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: e769-e774.
Lamas Pelayo J, Peñarrocha Diago M, Martí Bowen E, Peñarrocha Diago M. Intraoperative complications during oral implantology. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 13: E239-E243.
Herranz-Aparicio J, Marques J, Almendros-Marqués N, Gay-Escoda C. Retrospective study of the bone morphology in the posterior mandibular region. Evaluation of the prevalence and the degree of lingual concavity and their possible complications. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2016; 21: e731-e736.
Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Eitner S, Zöller JE, Kreppel M. Lingual concavities in the mandible: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43: 254-259.
Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, Hafezeqoran A, Gavgani FE. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e32-e36.
Mesquita Júnior EJ, Vieta AI, Taba Júnior M, Faria PE. Correlation of radiographic analysis during initial planning and tactile perception during the placement of implants. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 55: 17-21.
Correa LR, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Schropp L, da Silveira HE, Wenzel A. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 690-695.
Malina-Altzinger J, Damerau G, Grätz KW, Stadlinger PD. Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography-a comparative study. Int J Implant Dent 2015; 1: 17.
Jaju PP, Jaju SP. Clinical utility of dental cone-beam computed tomography: current perspectives. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2014; 6: 29-43.
Sumer AP, Zengin A.Z., Uzun C, Karoz T.B.,Sumer M, Danaci M. Evaluation of submandibular fossa using computed tomography and panoramic radiography. Oral Radiol 2105; 1: 23-27
Leong DJ, Chan HL, Yeh CY, Takarakis N, Fu JH, Wang HL. Risk of lingual plate perforation during implant placement in the posterior mandible: a human cadaver study. Implant Dent 2011; 20: 360-363.
Dubois L, de Lange J, Baas E, Van Ingen J. Excessive bleeding in the floor of the mouth after endosseus implant placement: a report of two cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39: 412-415.
Loukas M, Kinsella CR Jr, Kapos T, Tubbs RS, Ramachandra S. Anatomical variation in arterial supply of the mandible with special regard to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37: 367-371.
Woo BM, Al-Bustani S, Ueeck BA. Sublingual hematoma formation during immediate placement of mandibular endosseous implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35: 961-964.
Tomljenovic B, Herrmann S, Filippi A, Kühl S. Life-threatening hemorrhage associated with dental implant surgery: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 1079-1084.
Flannagan, D. Important arterial supply of the mandible, control of an arterial hemorrhage, and report of a hemorrhagic incident. J Oral Implantol 2003; 29: 165-173.
Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H.Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat 2010; 32: 343-349.
Haas LF, Dutra K, Porporatti AL, Mezzomo LA, De Luca Canto G, Flores-Mir C, Corrêa M. Anatomical variations of mandibular canal detected by panoramic radiography and CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20150310. doi: 10.1259/ dmfr.20150310.
Rodriguez Y Baena R, Beltrami R, Tagliabo A, Rizzo S, Lupi SM. Differences between panoramic and Cone Beam-CT in the surgical evaluation of lower third molars. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9: e259-e265.
Avsever H, Gunduz K, Karakoc O, Akyol M, Orhan K Incidental findings on cone-beam computed tomographic images: paranasal sinus findings and nasal septum variations. Oral Radiol 2018; 34: 40-48.
Yildiz S, Bayar GR, Guvenc I, Kocabiyik N, Cömert A, Yazar F. Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant. Surg Radiol Anat 2015; 37: 167-173.
Yoon TY, Patel M, Michaud RA, Manibo AM. Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Analysis of the Posterior and Anterior Mandibular Lingual Concavity for Dental Implant Patients. J Oral Implantol 2017; 43: 12-18.