Endodontide çalışma boyu belirleme yöntemleri

Çalışma boyunun doğru belirlenmesi, başarılı endodontik tedavinin en önemli basamaklarından biridir. Çalışma boyu, koronalde belirlenen bir referans noktasından apikalde kanal tedavisi işlemlerinin sonlandırılacağı sınıra kadar devam eden mesafe olarak tanımlanır. Genel olarak, minör apikal foramen, bu tedavi işlemlerinin bitirileceği son nokta olarak kabul görmektedir. Kök kanal uzunluğunun belirlenmesinde; parmak hassasiyeti, radyografik incelemeler, dijital görüntüleme yöntemleri, kağıt koni yöntemi, elektronik yöntem ve bu yöntemlerin farklı kombinasyonları kullanılabilmektedir. Bu derlemenin amacı, çalışma boyu belirleme yöntemlerinin çalışma prensipleri, avantajları, dezavantajları ve teknik gelişimlerinin gözden geçirilmesidir.

Working length determination methods in endodontics

Accurate determination of the working length is one of the crucial steps for a successful endodontic treatment. Working length is defined as the distance from a determined coronal reference point to the level at which root canal treatment procedures should terminate. Minor apical foramen is generally accepted as the termination point of these treatment procedures. Tactile sense, radiographic examinations, digital imaging systems, paper point technique, electronic method and different combinations of these methods are used for the determination of root canal length. The aim of this review is to present an overview on working principles, advantages, disadvantages and technical developments of the working length determination methods.

___

  • Renner D, Grazziotin-Soares R, Gavini G, Barletta FB. Influence of pulp condition on the accuracy of an electronic foramen locator in posterior teeth: An in vivo study. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26: 106-111.
  • Kuttler Y. Microscopic investigation of root apex. JADA 1955; 50: 544-552.
  • Morfis A, Sylaras SN, Georgopoulou M, Kernani M, Prountzos F. Study of the apices of human permanent teeth with the use of a scanning electron microscope. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 77: 172-176.
  • Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg 1972; 33: 101-110.
  • Tınaz AC. Kanal tedavisinde çalışma boyutu. GÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2001; 18 :31-37.
  • Dammaschke T, Steven D, Kaup M, Ott KH. Longterm survival of root-canal-treated teeth: A retrospective study over 10 years. J Endod 2003; 29: 638-643.
  • Kojima K, Inamoto K, . Success rate of endodontic treatment of teeth with vital and nonvital pulps. A meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 97: 95-99.
  • Seltzer S, Soltanoff W, Smith J. Biologic aspects of endodontics. V. Periapical tissue reactions to root canal instrumentation beyond the apex and root canal filling short of and beyond the apex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 36: 725-737.
  • Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, Engstrom B. Influence of apical overinstrumentation and over filling on retreated root canals. J Endod 1979; 5: 310-314.
  • Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, Heden G, Ödesjö B,Engstrom B. Retreatment of endodontic fillings. Scan J Dent Res 1979; 87: 217-224.
  • Basmadjian-Charles CL, Farge P, Bourgeois DM, Lebrun T. Factors influencing the long-term results of endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. Int Dent J 2002; 52: 81-86.
  • Seidberg BH, Alibrandi BV, Fine H, Logue B. Clinical investigation of measuring working lengths of root canals with an electronic device and with digital-tactile sense. JADA 1975; 90: 379-387.
  • Gordon MPJ, Chandler NP. Electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 425-437.
  • Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, eds. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp 2010, 10th edn. St Louis, MO: Mosby.
  • White E. Paper point in mental foramen. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1968; 25: 630-632.
  • Brown DW. Paper points revisited: risk of cellulose fibre shedding during canal length confirmation. Int Endod j 2016 in press; doi:10.1111/iej.12663
  • Nair PN, Sjögren U, Krey G, Sundqvist G. Therapy-resistant foreign body giant cell granuloma at the periapex of a root-filled human tooth. Journal of Endodontics 1990; 16; 589-595.
  • Gutmann J, Lovdahl P. Problem Solving in Endodontics. Prevention, Identification, and Management 2011, 5th edn. Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier/Mosby.
  • Rosenberg DB. The paper point technique, part 1. Dentistry Today 2003;22; 80–6.
  • Simon S, Machtou P, Adams N, Tomson P, Lumley P (2009) Apical limit and working length in endodontics. Dental Update 2009; 36: 146-150.
  • Ravanshad S, Adl A,Anvar J. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: A randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2010; 36: 1753-1756.
  • Green D. A stereomicroscopic study of the root apices of 400 maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1956; 9: 1224-1232.
  • Dummer PMH, McGinn JH, Rees DG. The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J 1984; 17: 192-198.
  • Çalışkan MK. Endodontide tanı ve tedaviler. 1. Baskı İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2006. s.254-272.
  • Nair MK, Nair UP. Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics. J Endod 2007; 33: 1-6
  • Goaz PW, White SC. Oral radiology: principle and interpretation. 3th ed., St. Louis: C.V. Mosby 1994. p.28-39.
  • Leddy BJ, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE Jr. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using radiovisiography. J Endod 1994; 20: 542-545.
  • Lamus F, Katz JO, Glaros AG. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics. J Contemp Dent Pract 2001; 15: 24-30.
  • Mentes A, Gencoglu N. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 88-91.
  • Lozano A, Forner L, Llena C. In vitro comparison of root-canal measurements with conventional and digital radiology. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 542-550.
  • Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Potter BJ. Measurement of the endodontic file lengths: calibrated versus uncalibrated digital images. J Endod 2001; 27: 779-781.
  • McDonald NJ. The electronic determination of working length. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 293-307.
  • Hoer D, Attin T. The accuracy of electronic working length determination. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 125-131.
  • Sunada I. New method for measuring the length of the root canal. Journal of Dental Research 1962; 41: 375-387.
  • Tinaz AC, Sibel Sevimli L, Gorgul G, Turkoz EG. The effects of sodium hypochlorite concentrations on the accuracy of an apex locating device. Journal of Endodontics 2002; 28: 160-162.
  • Pommer O, Stamm O, Attin T. Influence of the canal contents on the electrical associated determination of the length of root canals. J Endod 2002; 2: 83-85.
  • Kim E, Lee SJ. Electronic apex locator. Dent Clin N Am 2004; 48: 35-54.
  • Inoue N. An audiometric method for determining the length of root canals. J Can Dent Assoc 1973; 39: 630- 636.
  • McDonald NJ. The electronic determination of working length. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 293-307.
  • Fouad AF, Krell KV. An in vitro comparison of five root canal length measuring instruments. J Endod 1989; 15: 573-577.
  • Saito T, Yamashita Y. Electronic determination of root canal length by newly developed measuring device. Inflences of the diameter of the apical foramen, the size of K-file and the root canal irrigants. Dentistry in Japan 1990;27: 65-72.
  • Kobayshi C.h. and Suda H. A new engine – driven canal preparation system with electronic canal measuring capability. J Endod 1994; 23: 751-756
  • Pratten DH, McDonald NJ. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths. J Endod 1996; 22: 173-176.
  • Lauper R, Lutz F, Barbakow F. An in vivo comparison of gradient and absolute impedance electronic apex locators. J Endod 1996; 22: 260-263.
  • Meares WA, Steiman HR. The influence of sodium hypochlorite irrigation on the accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod 2002; 28: 595-598.
  • Ebrahim AK, Wadachi R, Suda H. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of five different electronic apex locators for determining the working length of endodontically retreated teeth. Aust Endod J 2007; 33: 7-12.
  • Dunlap CA, Remeikis NA, BeGole EA, . An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals. J Endod 1998; 24: 48-50.
  • Nguyen HQ, Kaufman AY, Komorowski RC, . Electronic length measurement using small and large files in enlarged canals. Int Endod J 1996; 29: 359-364.
  • Ibarrola JL, Chapman BL, Howard JH, . Effect of preflaring on Root ZX apex locators. J Endod 1999; 25: 625- 626.
  • Jenkins JA, Walker WA, Schindler WG, . An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of the Root ZX in the presence of various irrigants. J Endod 2001; 27: 209-211.
  • Kaufman AY, Keila S, Yoshpe M. Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study. Int Endod J 2002; 35:186- 192.
  • Goldberg F, Marroquín BB, Frajlich S, . In vitro evaluation of the ability of three apex locators to determine the working length during retreatment. J Endod 2005; 31: 676-678.
  • ElAyouti A, Löst C. A simple mounting model for consistent determination of the accuracy and repeatability of apex locators. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 108-112.
  • Welk A.R., Baumgartner J.C. and Marshall J.G. An in vivo comparison of two frequencybased electronic apex locators. J Endod 2003; 29: 497-500
  • Vera J and Gutierrez M. Accurate workinglength determination using a Fourth-generation apex locator. Contemp Endod 2004; 1: 4-8.
  • Dimitrov S, Roshkev D. Sixth generation adaptive apex locator. J IMAB 2009: 2: 75-87.
  • Shabahang S, Goon W, Gluskin A. An in vivo evaluation of Root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod 1996; 22: 616–8.
  • Welk AR, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators. J Endod 2003; 29: 497-500.
  • Czerw RJ, Fulkerson MS, Donnelly JC, Walmann JO. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of several electronic apex locators. J Endod 1995; 21: 572-575.
  • Weiger R, John C, Geigle H, Lost C. An in vitro comparison of two modern apex locators. J Endod 1999; 25: 765-768.
  • Silveira LF, Petry FV, Martos J, Neto JB. In vivo comparison of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators. Aust Endod J 2011; 37: 70-72.
  • Stober EK, Duran-Sindreu F, Mercade M, Vera J, Bueno R, Roig M. An evaluation of Root ZX and iPex apex locators: An in vivo study. J Endod 2011; 37: 608-610.
  • Himel VT, Cain C. An evaluation of two electronic apex locators in a dental student clinic. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 803-806.
  • Hembrough JH, Weine FS, Pisano JV, Eskoz N. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator: A clinical evaluation in maxillary molars. J Endod 1993; 19: 242-246.
  • Hassanien EE, Hashem A, Chalfin H. Histomorphometric study of the root apex of mandibular premolar teeth: An attempt to correlate working length measured with electronic and radiograph methods to various anatomic positions in the apical portion of the canal. J Endod 2008; 34: 408-412.
  • Mancini M, Felici R, Conte G, Costantini M, Cianconi L. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: An ex vivo study. J Endod 2011; 37: 684-687.
  • Vieyra JP, Acosta J. Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 510-518.
  • Real DG, Davidowicz H, Moura-Netto C, Zenkner Cde L, Pagliarin CM, Barletta FB, . Accuracy of working length determination using 3 electronic apex locators and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111: e44-9.
  • Kishor KM. Comparison of working length determi -nation using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13: 550-553.
  • Cianconi L, Angotti V, Felici R, Conte G, Mancini M. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators compared with digital radiography: An ex vivo study. J Endod 2010; 36: 2003-2007.
  • Janner SF, Jeger FB, Lussi A, Bornstein MM. Precisi -on of endodontic working length measurements: A pilot investigation comparing cone-beam computed tomog -raphy scanning with standard measurement techniques. J Endod 2011; 37: 1046-1051.
  • Lucena C, Lopez JM, Martin JA, Robles V, Gonza -lez-Rodriguez MP. Accuracy of working length measure -ment: electronic apex locator versus cone-beam compu -ted tomography. Int Endod J. 2014; 47: 246-256.
  • Goldberg F, Frajlich S, Kuttler S, Manzur E, BrisenoMarroquin B. The evaluation of four electronic apex locators in teeth with simulated horizontal oblique root fractures. J Endod 2008; 34: 1497-1499.
  • Topuz O, Uzun O, Tinaz AC, Bodrumlu E, Gorgul G. Accuracy of two apex-locating handpieces in detecting simulated vertical and horizontal root fractures. J Endod 2008; 34: 310-313.
  • Aggarwal V, Singla M, Kabi D. An in vitro evaluation of performance of two electronic root canal length measu -rement devices during retreatment of different obturating materials. J Endod 2010; 36: 1526-1530.
  • Alves AM, Felippe MC, Felippe WT, Rocha MJ. Ex vivo evaluation of the capacity of the Tri Auto ZX to locate the apical foramen during root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 718-724.
  • Srivastava V, Jain N, Bagchi S, Negi MPS. Evaluation of the Use of Sixth Generation Apex Locators as a Diagnostic Tool to Detect Root Perforations. Int J Dent Med Spec 2015; 2: 10-14.
7tepe Klinik-Cover
  • ISSN: 2458-9586
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: Yeditepe Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Üç farklı arayüz temizleme aracının temizleme etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi: in vitro çalışma

GİZEM İNCE KUKA, OGÜL LEMAN TUNAR, HARE GÜRSOY, Bahar KURU

Ortodontik pekiştirme döneminde hasta memnuniyeti ve ağız hijyeninin değerlendirilmesi

R Burcu Nur YILMAZ, Nigora ÇELEN, FULYA ÖZDEMİR

Assesment of submandibular fossa depth using cone beam computed tomography

M. Oğuz BORAHAN, Fatma Güler DÖNMEZ, Gamze ULAY, Ayşe Nur YILDIZ SADIKOĞLU, Filiz NAMDAR PEKİNER

Atmosferik soğuk plazma uygulamasının titanyum meş üzerindeki etkilerinin in vitro olarak değerlendirilmesi

HÜSEYİN AKÇAY, Harun GÖRGÜLÜ, UTKU KÜRŞAT ERCAN, MURAT ULU, Fatma İBİŞ, Emina Afra DEMİRCİ, OZAN KARAMAN

Farklı rezidüel kemik yüksekliğinde sinüs tabanı yükseltme operasyonu ile eşzamanlı yerleştirilen implantların sağkalımının değerlendirilmesi

ELÇİN BEDELOĞLU, BAHATTİN ALPER GÜLTEKİN

Diş rengi seçiminde bilgi, tecrübe ve cinsiyetin etkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Ayşe ERZİNCANLI, Ender KAZAZOĞLU

The effect of dentin desensitizers on shear bond strengths and vickers surface hardness of self-adhesive resin cement

MURAT ALKURT, ZEYNEP YEŞİL DUYMUŞ, MUSTAFA GÜNDOĞDU, Fikret Özgür COŞKUN, Tugay ŞİŞCİ, Mustafa YILDIRIM

Dentin hassasiyet gidericilerin self-adesiv resin simanın yüzey sertliğine ve makaslama bağlantı dayanıklılığına etkisi

Murat ALKURT, Mustafa GÜNDOĞDU, Zeynep YEŞİL DUYMUŞ, Tugay ŞİŞÇİ, Fikret Özgür COŞKUN, Mustafa YILDIRIM

Maksiller sinüs patolojilerinin konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi

GÜLŞİLAY SAYAR, Kader AYDIN

Endodontide çalışma boyu belirleme yöntemleri

ÖZGÜR GENÇ ŞEN, Ali ERDEMİR