Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi kullanarak dişli hastalarda maksiller sinüs anatomisinin morfometrik analizi: bir cinsiyet değerlendirme çalışması

Amaç: Cinsiyet tanımlaması klasik bir adli prosedürdür ve ölüm sonrası profil oluşturulmasında önemli bir adımdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) taramaları ile elde edilen maksiller sinüs (MS) ölçümlerini kullanarak bireylerin cinsiyetini belirlemek ve bu ölçümlerin doğruluğunu araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada 20 ila 41 yaşları arasında tam dişli 207 bireyin (81 erkek ve 126 kadın) toplam 414 MS’si değerlendirildi. KIBT kullanılarak MS’nin uzunluğu (iç duvar), genişliği ve yüksekliği ölçüldü. Tanımlayıcı istatistikler, Mann Whitney-U testi ve diskriminant fonksiyon analizi kullanıldı. Tüm analizlerde, p

Morphometric analyses of maxillary sinus anatomy in dentate patients using cone beam computed tomography: a gender assessment study

Aim: Gender identification is a classical judicial procedure, and an important step in creating a post-mortem profile. The purpose of this study was to determine the gender of the individuals using maxillary sinus (MS) measurements obtained with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and to investigate the accuracy of these measurements. Materials and Methods: In this study, a total of 414 MSs of 207 individuals (81 males and 126 females aged between 20 and 41 years) with a complete dentition were evaluated. The length (internal wall), width and height of the MS were measured using CBCT. Descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney-U test and discriminant function tests were used. In all analyses, values less than p

PDF

___

1. Ono I, Ohura T, Narumi E, Kawashima K, Matsuno I, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of craniofacial bones using three-dimensional computer tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992;20:49-60.
2. Robling AG, Ubelaker DH. Sex estimation from the metatarsals. J Forensic Sci 1997;42:1062-1069.
3. Saccucci M, Cipriani F, Carderi S, Di Carlo G, D'Attilio M, et al. Gender assessment through three-dimensional analysis of maxillary sinuses by means of cone beam computed tomography. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19:185-193.
4. Asala SA. Sex determination from the head of the femur of south african whites and blacks. Forensic Sci Int 2001;117:15-22.
5. Uthman AT, Al-Rawi NH, Al-Naaimi AS, Al-Timimi JF. Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions in gender determination using helical ct scanning. J Forensic Sci 2011;56:403-408.
6. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Mirtella D, Rollo F, Cingolani M. Frontal sinuses for identification: Qualityof classifications, possible error and potential corrections. J Forensic Sci 2005;50:770-773.
7. Teke HY, Duran S, Canturk N, Canturk G. Determination of gender by measuring the size of the maxillary sinuses in computerized tomography scans. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29:9-13.
8. Masri AM, Yusof A, Hassan R. A three dimensional computed tomography (3d-ct): A study of maxillary sinus in malays. CJBAS 2013;1:125-134.
9. Azhar A, Ibrahim G, Salah F. Ct scan images analysis of maxillary sinus dimensions as a forensic tool for sexual and racial detection in a sample of kurdish population. Eur Sci J 2015;11:271-281.
10. Sharma SK, Jehan M, Kumar A. Measurements of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions by computed tomography scan for gender determination. J Anat Soc India 2014;63:36-42.
11. Lenza MG, Lenza MM, Dalstra M, Melsen B, Cattaneo PM. An analysis of different approaches to the assessment of upper airway morphology: A cbct study. Orthod Craniofac Res 2010;13:96-105.
12. Urooge A, Patil BA. Sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus: A morphometric analysis using cone beam computed tomography. JCDR 2017;11:zc67-zc70.
13. Mastrangelo P, De Luca S, Sánchez-Mejorada G. Sex assessment from carpals bones: Discriminant function analysis in a contemporary mexican sample. Forensic Sci Int 2011;209:196.e1-96.e15.
14. Ekizoglu O, Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Sayin I, Kayhan FT, et al. The use of maxillary sinus dimensions in gender determination: A thin-slice multidetector computed tomography assisted morphometric study. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:957-960.
15. Rani SU, Rao GV, Kumar DR, Sravya T, Sivaranjani Y, et al. Age and gender assessment through three-dimensional morphometric analysis of maxillary sinus using magnetic resonance imaging. J Forensic Dent Sci 2017;9:46.
16. Dayal MR, Bidmos MA. Discriminating sex in south african blacks using patella dimensions. J Forensic Sci 2005;50:1294-1297.
17. Sahlstrand-Johnson P, Jannert M, Strombeck A, Abul-Kasim K. Computed tomography measurements of different dimensions of maxillary and frontal sinuses. BMC Med Imaging 2011;11:8.
18. Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Zarei Z. Sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography. J Forensic Sci 2017;62:395-398.
19. Fernandes CL. Forensic ethnic identification of crania: The role of the maxillary sinus--a new approach. The Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2004;25:302-313.
20. Attia A, Badrawy AE-B, Shebel H. Gender identification from maxillary sinus using multi detector computed tomography. Mansoura J Forensic Med Clin Toxicol 2012;12:17-28.
21. Ariji Y, Ariji E, Yoshiura K, Kanda S. Computed tomographic indices for maxillary sinus size in comparison with the sinus volume. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25:19-24.
22. Kiruba L, Gupta C, Kumar S, De Souza AS. A study of morphometric evaluation of the maxillary sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images. Arch Med Health Sci 2014;2:12-15.
23. Akhlaghi M, Bakhtavar K, Kamali A, Maarefdoost J, Sheikhazadi A, et al. The diagnostic value of anthropometric indices of maxillary sinuses for sex determination using ct-scan images in iranian adults: A cross-sectional study. J Forensic Leg Med 2017;49:94-100.
24. Ahmed A, S. Gataa I, Saleh MF. Ct scan images analysis of maxillary sinus dimensions as a forensic tool for sexual and racial detection in a sample of kurdish population. Eur Sci J 2015;11:272-281. 25. Robinson MS, Bidmos MA. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations. Forensic Sci Int 2009;186(1):86.e1–.e5.