Diş rengi seçiminde bilgi, tecrübe ve cinsiyetin etkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, renk kavramları hakkında eğitim, cinsiyet ve tecrübe seviyesinin görsel renk seçimindeki başarıya olan etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Diş Hekimliği lisans ve Protetik Diş Tedavisi yüksek lisans öğrencilerinden oluşan toplam 218 renk körü olmayan katılımcı araştırmaya dahil edildi. Öğrencilerin yarısına renk kavramı ve renk seçimi prensipleri hakkında eğitim verildi. Protetik Diş Tedavisi yüksek lisans öğrencileri eğitimli olarak kabul edildi. Tootguide Trainer (TT) yazılımı ile birlikte çalışan Toothguide Training Box (TTB) kullanılarak katılımcıların renk eşleştirme alıştırmaları tamamladı ve final testi sonuçları elde edildi. (∑E) ile TT yazılımının verdiği toplam skor, her katılımcı için hesaplandı. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular değerlendirilirken, niceliksel verilerin karşılaştırılmasında ve normal dağılım gösteren parametrelerin gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarında Oneway Anova testi ve farklılığa neden çıkan grubun tespitinde Tukey HDS testi kullanıldı. Normal dağılım gösteren parametrelerin iki grup arası karşılaştırmalarında Student t test kullanıldı. Niteliksel verilerin karşılaştırılmasında ise Ki-Kare testi kullanıldı. Anlamlılık p

Evaluation of the knowledge, experience and gender influence on the shade matching

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of color education, gender and level of experience on shade matching quality. Materials and Methods: A study was simultaneously performed a total of 218 color normal participants who were dental students and prosthodontic post-graduate students. A lecture on color and color matching in dentistry was given to half of the dental students. Post-graduate students were accepted as educated. Toothguide Training Box (TTB) with Toothguide Trainer (TT) software, was used by all participants to perform training procedure and lastly final test was done by the TTB. The shade matching score for each participant was computed as a sum of color differences (∑∆E) between target tabs and selected tabs. The evaluation of the quantative data and comparison between groups were performed by Oneway Anova test, and Tukey HDS test was used for the group which causes discrepancy. Parameters showing normal distribution, Student's t test was used for comparisons between the two groups. Qualitative data were compared using Chi- square test. Significance was evaluated at p

PDF

___

Della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 276-281.
McPhee ER. Light and color in dentistry. Part I Nature and perception. J Mich Dent Assoc 1978; 60: 565-572.
Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. II. Practical applications of the organization of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 29: 556-566.
Marcucci B. A shade selection technique. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 518-521.
Vita. Vitapan 3D-Master, The Tooth Shade System That Makes Perfect Shade Matching Simple. Bad Sackingen, Germany: VITA Zahnfabrik; 1998.
Paravina RD. Performance assessment of dental shade guides. J Dent 2009, 37: 15-20.
Vita Zahnfabrik. Vita Presents The New Toothguide Training Box Mark II. Bad Säckingen, Germany.
Ahn J, Lee Y. Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100: 18-28.
Şahin E, Sarıoğlu B. Diş Hekimliğinde Işık ve Renk. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 1983; 7: 141-153.
Carsten D.L. Successful Shade Matching – What does it take? Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003; 24: 175-185.
Barna GJ, Taylor JW, King GE, Pelleu GB. The influence of selected light intensities on color perception within a color range of natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1981, 46: 450-453.
Wee AG, Monaghan P, Johnston WM. Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated sha de of dental porcelain. J prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 657-666.
Dagg H, O’Connell B, Claffey N, Byrne D, Gorman C. The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 900-904.
Curd FM, Jasinevicius TR, Graves A, Cox V, Sadan A. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 391-396.
Chu SJ, Devigus A, Mieleszko AJ. Fundamentals Of Color: Shade Matching And Communication In Esthetic Dentistry. Quintessence Pub, New York, 2004; 45: 1-17.
Saleski CG. Color, light and shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 27: 263-268.
Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative Dentistry; The science and strategies. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 467-479.
Jasinevicius TR, Curd FM, Schilling L, Sadan A. Shade-matching abilities of dental laboratory technicians using a commercial light source. J Prosthodont 2009; 18: 60-63.
Corcodel N, Rammelsberg P, Jakstat H, Moldovan O, Schwarz S, Hassel AJ. The linear shade guide design of Vita 3D-master performs as well as the original design of the Vita 3D-master. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 860-865.
Haddad H, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G, Borbly J, Vichi A, Dumfahrt H, Renault P, Corcodel N, Pohlen B, Marada G, de Parga JA, Reshad M, Klinke TU, Hannak WB, Paravina RD. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality? J Dent 2009; 37: 40-44.
Xu MM, Xu TK, Liu F, Shi XR, Feng HL, The influence of toothguide training box on shade matching veracity. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology 2009; 18: 432-435.
Liu F, Xu FT, Xu MM, Song GY. Application and comparison of two shade guide training systems. Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2009; 44: 645-648.
Barrett AA, Grimaudo NJ, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 591-597.
Klemetti E, Matela AM, Haag P, Kononen M. Shade selection performed by novice dental professionals and colorimeter. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 31-35.
Çapa N, Malkondu Ö, Kazazoğlu E, Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141: 71-76.
McMaugh D.R. A comparative analysis of the colour matching ability of dentists, dental students, and ceramic technicians. Aust Dent J 1977; 22: 165-167.
Al-Dosari A. Reliability of tooth shade perception by dental professionals and patients. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2010; 80: 244-249.
Miller L. Organizing color in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 26-40. 29. Miller LL. Shade selection. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6: 47- 60.
Goodkind JR, Loupe MJ. Teaching of color in predoctoral and postdoctoral dental education in 1988. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 713-717.
Pensler AV. What you were not taught about shade selection. Dent Econ 1995; 85: 80-81.
Winkler S, Boberrick KG, Weitz KS, Datikashvili I, Wood R. Shade Matching by dental students. J Oral Implantol 2006; 32: 256-258.
Sim CPC, Yap AUJ, Teo J. Color perception among different dental personnel. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 435-439.
Paravina RD. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparaturs. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 528-534.
Geary JL, Kinirons MJ. Use of a Common Shade Guide to Test the Perception of Differences in the Shades and Value by Members of the Dental Team. Prim Dent Care 1999; 6: 107-110.
Lagouvardos PE, Diamanti H, Polyzois G. Effect of Individual Shades on Reliability and Validity of Observers in Colour Matching. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 2004; 12: 51-56.
Docherty E. A clinical audit of shade taking in dental personnel. BDS Elective Report, 2008.
Jaju RA, Nagai S, Karimbux N, Da Silva JD. Evaluating tooth color matching ability of dental students. J Dent Educ 2010; 74: 1002-1010.
Powers JM, SakaguchiRL. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 12th edition. St. Şouis: Mosby; 28-31, 2006.