Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi'ne başvuran hastalarda periodontal hastalık farkındalığı
Amaç: Periodontal hastalık, tedavi edilmediğinde diş kaybına neden olabilen bir hastalıktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi'ne başvuran hastaların klinik periodontal ölçümleri ve kendi ifadeleri karşılaştırılarak periodontal hastalık farkındalıklarının değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 250 hasta dahil edilmiştir. Hastaların periodontal hastalık endikasyonları, kanama değerleri, dişeti çekilmesi ve mobilite varlığı değerlendirilmiştir. Sondalamada kanama değerleri modifiye dişeti oluğu kanama indeksi kullanılarak elde edilmiş, dişeti kanaması olan bölgelerin ortalaması >%10 ya da daha az olmasına göre ikiye bölünerek değerlendirilmiştir. Periodontal hastalık endikasyonu klinik ataşman kaybına göre belirlenmiştir. Hastalara klinik muayene öncesi anket formuyla, kendilerine ait demografik bilgileri, sistemik anamnez, sigara içme durumları ve periodontal hastalık algıları ile ilgili sorular yöneltilmiştir. Periodontal hastalık farkındalıkları klinik ölçüm değerleri ile kendi ifadeleri karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmada periodontal hastalık ile diş mobilitesi arasında istatistiksel anlamlı bir fark gözlenmiştir (p
Awareness of periodontal disease among the patients applied to Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry
Aim: Periodontal disease, if untreated, can lead to tooth lost. The aim of this study was to evaluate the periodontal disease awareness and knowledge of patients referred to Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Periodontology Department by comparing their clinical periodontal measurements and self-reports. Material and Methods: In total, 250 participants were included in the study. Patients were evaluated in terms of diagnosis of periodontal disease, bleeding scores, gingival recession and tooth mobility. Gingival bleeding was assessed using the Modified gingival sulcus bleeding index. The analysis between self-reports of gingival bleeding and bleeding on probing (BOP)% was made after dichotomizing as less and >10% bleeding sites. Clinical attachment loss measurements were used for periodontal diagnosis. Demographical data, systemic conditions, smoking habits and self-report of periodontal disease of the participants were determined using a questionnaire. The periodontal disease awareness was evaluated by comparing their clinical periodontal measurements and self-reports. Results: In our study, the self-reports of tooth mobility exhibited statistically significant correlations with clinical examination (p<0,05). The mean BOP% of the patients was 31.7%. The awareness of gingival bleeding and recession were not found statistically significant (p>0,05). Despite 78.6% of the patients knew that gingival bleeding was a disease, only 54.1 of them was aware of bleeding of their own gingiva. Awareness of periodontal disease was 42.4% in our population. This awareness was not statistically significant when was compared with the educational level.Conclusion: The patients admitted to our department, regardless of the level of education, were seen that the knowledge about periodontal disease was not adequate, the relationship between periodontal disease and gingival bleeding were not known. Patients were only aware of the disease when they had tooth mobility.
___
- 1. Mariotti A. Dental Plaque-Induced Gingival Diseases. Annals of Periodontology 1999; 4: 7-17.
- 2. Armitage GC. Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Ann Periodontol 1999; 4: 1-6.
- 3. Parameter on plaque-induced gingivitis. American Academy of Periodontology. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 851- 852.
- 4. Polson AM, Caton JG. Current status of bleeding in the diagnosis of periodontal diseases. J Periodontol 1985; 56: 1-3.
- 5. Lin HC, Wong MC, Wang ZJ, Lo EC. Oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Chinese adults. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 1466-1470.
- 6. El-Qaderi SS.,Ta'ani DQ. Assessment of periodontal knowledge and periodontal status of an adult population in Jordan. Int J Dent Hygiene 2004; 2: 132-136.
- 7. Paul Erik P, Hiroshi O. Strengthing the Prevention of Periodontal Disease. The WHO Approach. J Periodont 2005; 76: 2187-2193.
- 8. Axelsson P, Nystrom B, Lindhe J. The long term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal diseases in adults. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 749-757.
- 9. Page RC, Eke PI. Case definitions for use in population-based surveillance of periodontitis. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 1387-1399.
- 10. Mühlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding--a leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta 1971; 15: 107-113.
- 11. Takei, HH; Carranza, FA; Do LH: Clinical Diagnosis. In: Newman, MG; Takei, HH; Carranza FA, editors. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology, 12th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2015. P. 364.
- 12. Noonan B. Understanding the reasons why patients delay seeking treatment for oral cancer symptoms from a primary health care professional: An integrative literature review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2014; 18: 118-124.
- 13. Brady WF. Periodontal disease awareness. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 109: 706-710.
- 14. Schwarz E, Lo EC. Dental health knowledge and attitudes among the middle-aged and the elderly in Hong Kong. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994; 22358- 22363.
- 15. Taani DQ. Periodontal awareness and knowledge, and pattern of dental attendance among adults in Jordan. Int Dent J 2002; 52: 94-98. 16. Offenbacher S, Barros SP, Singer RE, Moss K, Williams