Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Google Inc. Example

İşletmeler için büyüme stratejilerinden birisi diğer işletmeleri satın almaktır. Büyüme, işletmenin esas faaliyet alanı ile ilgili olabilirken, farklı sektörlerden farklı faaliyet alanları ile ilgili de olabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada sınırlı sayıda işletmenin (Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Facebook gibi.) oluşturduğu oligopol bir yapıya sahip internet sektöründe önemli bir şirket olan Google Inc.’nin satın alma stratejisi incelenmiştir. 2001 ve 2017 tarihleri arasında 177 adet satın alma işlemi incelenmiştir. Bu inceleme sonucunda Google Inc.’nin farklı teknolojik alanlarda üretim yapan işletmeleri satın aldığı fakat bu satın almalar sonucunda esas faaliyet alanında elde ettiği gelirleri artıracak yeteneklere sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Sonuç olarak, seçilen Google örneğinde 177 satın alma arasında “kısıtlı ilişkili çeşitlendirme” modeli, temel işin performansını arttırmaya yönelik en sık gözlenen strateji olarak belirlenmiştir.

Diversification Strategy in Internet Industry: Case of Google Inc.

One of the growth strategies for business is to buy other businesses. Growth either may be related to main business area of firm or different fields from different sectors. This study examines the buying strategy of Google Inc. which is an important company in the internet industry with an oligopolistic structure created by a limited number of operators (Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Facebook, etc.). Between the years of 2001 and 2017, 177 acquisitions were examined. As a result of this review, it appears that Google Inc. has acquired businesses that manufacture in different technological areas. However, those acquisitions increased abilities of generating revenues from its core business. Consequently, among 177 acquisitions, constrained-related diversification model is most frequently observed strategy which is aimed to increase performance of main business. 

___

  • Ansoff, H. (1958). A Model for Diversification. Management Science, 392-415.
  • Arthur, E. (2017). Strategic Decision Making: Google’s Acquisitions, Partnerships and the “Toothbrush Test”. The 15th Annual Conference on Telecommunications and Information Technology (s. 1-11). Nashville, Tennessee: ITERA.
  • Bhatia, A., & Thakur, A. (2016). Diversification Strategies of Multi-national and Domestic Companies in India: A Comparative Evaluation in the Dynamic Environment. Management and Labour Studies, 41(3), 199 - 215.
  • Crookes, D. (2014, 1 30). The 142 Companies That Google Has Bought (And How It Affects You). Micro Mart, s. 1-6.
  • Dolata, U. (2017). Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft: Market concentration - competition - innovation strategies. Stuttgartt: University of Stuttgart.
  • Dyck, B., & Mitchell J.Neubert. (2009). Management: Current Practices and New Directions. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishin Company.
  • Google (Yöneten). (2009). I/O 2009 - Keynot [Video].
  • Google (Yöneten). (2012). Google I/O 2012 - Keynote [Video].
  • Google (Yöneten). (2014). Google I/O 2014 - Keynote, [Video].
  • Google (Yöneten). (2015). Google I/O 2015 - Keynote [Video].
  • Google (Yöneten). (2016). Google I/O 2016 - Keynote [Video].
  • Google (Yöneten). (2017). Google I/O 2017-Keynote [Video].
  • Grant, R. M. (2016). Contemporary Strategy Analysis, Text and Cases. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Griffith, E. (2017, 1 30). Google Is On the Prowl For Cloud and AI Deals in 2017. Fortune: http://fortune.com/2017/01/30/google-acquisitions-2017 adresinden alınmıştır
  • Heracleous, L. (2001). What is the Impact of Corporate Governance on Organisational Performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(3), 165-173.
  • Hong, A., Bhattacharyya, D., & Geis, G. (2012). The Role of M&A in Market Convergence: Amazon, Apple, Google and Microsoft . 18th International Business Research Conference, (s. 1-9). Nevada.
  • Mayer, M., & Whittington, R. (2003). Diversification in context: a cross-national and cross-temporal extension. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 773–781.
  • Peng, M. W., & Delios, A. (2006). What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? AnAsia Pacific perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 385– 405.
  • Picone, P. M., & Dagnino, G. B. (2016). Revamping research on unrelated diversification strategy: perspectives, opportunities and challenges for future inquiry. Journal of Management & Governance, 413-445.
  • Rumelt, R. P. (1974). Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA,: Harvard University Press.
  • Tsai, C.-C. (1994). Diversification Strategies For Construction Companies In The U.S., Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi . Masachusets: MIT.
  • Ulgen, H., & Mirze., K. (2007). Stratejik Yönetim. Istanbul: Arıkan.
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2012). FORM 10-K, For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012. Washington: United States Securities and Exchange Commission,.
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2016). Alphabet Inc., FORM 10-K, For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016. Washington: United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2017). FORM 10-K, For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017. Washington: United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • United States Security and Exchange Commission. (2007, 03 01). Google Inc., a Delaware Corporation. List of Subidiaries of Registrant: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312507044494/dex2101.htm adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Varadarajan, P., & Ramanujam, V. (1987). Diversification and performance: A re-examination using a new two-dimensional conceptualization of diversity in firms. Academy of Management Journal, 380-393.
  • Żukowska, J., & Pindelsk, M. (2011). Growth Strategies – Case Study. J. Czech-Rogosz, J. Pietrucha, & R. Iron içinde, Wybrane Aspekty Przemian Strukturalnych (s. 237-245). Katowice: Publisher University of Economics.