Serkan ORAL, Alper ŞİŞMANOĞLU, Yaşam Kemal AKPAK, Sebahattin ÇELİK, Nazan YURTÇU

The effect of embryo transfer technique on pregnancy and live birth rates in infertile women undergoing IVF treatment with freeze-all strategy

Objective: The aim of this observational retrospective cohort study was to define the effect of the embryo transfer (ET) technique on pregnancy and live birth rates. Material and Methods: Infertile women with good prognostic factors undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment with freezing all the 5th day good quality embryos and con- secutive frozen ET in 468 infertile good responders with first quality 5th day embryos were chosen for this study. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of ET on the live birth rates. Results: Of the six predictive values, four were statistically significant: The easy pas- sage of the external catheter, ultrasonographic visualization of the bubble, leaving the embryo at the desired location, and bleeding found in the external catheter after the catheter were excluded from the cervical ostium. While the probability of pregnancy decreased by 98.1% in cases where the embryo could not be left at the expected location, it was observed that the probability of pregnancy decrease was 96.4% in cases where no bubble could be seen, and 59.2% in cases with bleeding in the external catheter. Similarly, a 74.4% decrease in the probability of pregnancy was observed in patients in whom the passage of the catheter was difficult. Even though the tip of the transfer catheter during the ET is easily seen, the blood in the external catheter decreases pregnancy chance. Conclusion: Visualizing the internal catheter and the air bubble under the ultrasound guidance with the atraumatic placing of the embryo 1–1.5 cm away from the uterine fundus is crucial for the success of ET.

PDF

___

1. Allahbadia GN, Kadam K, Gandhi G, Arora S, Valliappan JB, Joshi A, et al. Embryo transfer using the SureView catheter-beacon in the womb. Fertil Steril 2010;93:344–50.
2. McDonald JA, Norman RJ. A randomized controlled trial of a soft double lumen embryo transfer catheter versus a firm single lumen catheter: Sig- nificant improvements in pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1502– 6.
3. Buckett WM. A review and meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing different catheters used for embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2006;85:728– 34.
4. Brown J, Buckingham K, Buckett W, Abou-Setta AM. Ultrasound versus ‘clinical touch’ for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;3:CD006107.
5. Tiras B, Polat M, Korucuoglu U, Zeyneloglu HB, Yarali H. Impact of em- bryo replacement depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer out- comes. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1341–5.
6. Eskandar MA, Abou-Setta AM, El-Amin M, Almushait MA, Sobande AA. Removal of cervical mucus prior to embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed On- line 2007;14:308–13.
7. Moragianni VA, Cohen JD, Smith SE, Schinfeld JS, Somkuti SG, Lee A, et al. Effect of macroscopic or microscopic blood and mucus on the success rates of embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2010;93:570–3.
8. Plowden TC, Hill MJ, Miles SM, Hoyt B, Yauger B, Segars JH, et al. Does the presence of blood in the catheter or the degree of difficulty of embryo transfer affect live birth? Reprod Sci 2017;24:726–30.
9. Schoolcraft WB. Importance of embryo transfer technique in maximizing assisted reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril 2016;105:855–60.
10. Yao Z, Vansteelandt S, Van der Elst J, Coetsier T, Dhont M, De Sutter P. The efficacy of the embryo transfer catheter in IVF and ICSI is operator- dependent: A randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 2009;24:880–7.
11. Frydman R. Impact of embryo transfer techniques on implantation rates. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) [Article in French] 2004;33:S36–9.
12. Kava-Braverman A, Martínez F, Rodríguez I, Álvarez M, Barri PN, Coroleu B. What is a difficult transfer? Analysis of 7,714 embryo trans- fers: The impact of maneuvers during embryo transfers on pregnancy rate and a proposal of objective assessment. Fertil Steril 2017;107:657– 63.e1.
13. Arora P, Mishra V. Difficult embryo transfer: A systematic review. J Hum Reprod Sci 2018;11:229–35.
14. Tomás C, Tikkinen K, Tuomivaara L, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. The degree of difficulty of embryo transfer is an independent factor for pre- dicting pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2632–5.
15. Spitzer D, Haidbauer R, Corn C, Stadler J, Wirleitner B, Zech NH. Ef- fects of embryo transfer quality on pregnancy and live birth delivery rates. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012;29:131–5.
16. Tur-Kaspa I, Yuval Y, Bider D, Levron J, Shulman A, Dor J. Difficult or repeated sequential embryo transfers do not adversely affect in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates or outcome. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2452–5.
17. Tıras B, Cenksoy PO. Practice of embryo transfer: Recommendations during and after. Semin Reprod Med 2014;32:291–6.
18. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: ASRM@asrm.org; Practice Committee of the Ameri- can Society for Reproductive Medicine. Performing the embryo transfer: A guideline. Fertil Steril 2017;107:882–96.
19. Brown J, Buckingham K, Buckett W, Abou-Setta AM. Ultrasound versus ‘clinical touch’ for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;3:CD006107.
20. Cozzolino M, Vitagliano A, Di Giovanni MV, Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Bla- ganje M, et al. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: Summary of the ev- idence and new perspectives. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2018;36:524–42.
21. Lambers MJ, Dogan E, Lens JW, Schats R, Hompes PG. The position of transferred air bubbles after embryo transfer is related to pregnancy rate. Fertil Steril 2007;88:68–73.
22. Baba K, Ishihara O, Hayashi N, Saitoh M, Taya J, Kinoshita K. Where does the embryo implant after embryo transfer in humans? Fertil Steril 2000;73:123–5.
23. Aichberger L, Boldizsar A, Herczeg C, Obermair A, Plöckinger B, Strohmer H, et al. Vaginal ultrasonographic observation of uterine con- tractions in embryo transfer and its relevance to treatment success. Ge- burtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1991;51:27–30.