Meryem ONAY, Sema ŞANAL BAŞ, Ümit AKKEMİK, Ayten BİLİR

Effect of COVID-19 on anesthesia preferences in cesarean section: An observational study

Objective: During the pandemic, everyone including healthcare professionals were under stress. Regional blocks in the cesarean section were considered safer during this period. We aimed to evaluate the effect of this stress on the patient’s choice of anesthesia. Material and Methods: Pregnant women were surveyed preoperatively during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The survey investigated the demo- graphic data, pregnancy information, previous delivery type, anesthesia experiences, known panic attack/anxiety diagnosis, and anesthesia preferences before and after COVID-19 and factors affecting this decision. Results: A total of 108 patients, including elective (n=63) and urgent (n=45), were included in this study. The anesthesia techniques applied to the patients were spinal anesthesia (n=98), epidural anesthesia (n=1), and general anesthesia (n=9). When enquired on the change in their preferences due to COVID-19, only 16.6% (n=18) stated that the patients were affected. In addition, 94.4% of the patients (n=17) un- derwent regional anesthesia and 5.5% (n=1) underwent general anesthesia owing to anticoagulant use. Furthermore, 58.3% of the patients (n=63) were subjected to their preferred anesthesia technique, whereas 36.1% (n=39) underwent regional anesthe- sia based on the physicians’ recommendations for maternal/fetal health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: We investigated the effect of the anxiety associated with COVID-19 on the anesthesia preferences of pregnant women and found that only a small percent- age of patients had a change in their preferences due to COVID-19.

PDF

___

1. World Health Organization. World health Statistics 2015: Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available at: https://www.who.int/ docs/default-source/gho-documents/world-health-statistic-reports/ world-health-statistics-2015.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2020.
2. Bıyık İ, Aslan MM. The effects of antenatal education on fear of childbirth and cesarean rates. Kocaeli Med J 2020;9:77–82.
3. Aksoy M, Aksoy AN, Dostbil A, Çelik MG, Ahıskalıoğlu A. Anaesthesia techniques for caesarean operations: Retrospective analysis of last de- cade. Turk J Anesth Reanim 2014;42:128–132.
4. Sahinturk H, Turhan S, Can SO, Yılmaz AA, Uysalel A. Factors affecting anaesthesia preferences of the gravid women who are to deliver by cae- sarean section. Sanamed 2019;14:13–20.
5. Zaigham M, Andersson O. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with COVID -19: A systematic review of 108 pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gyne- col Scand 2020;99:823–9.
6. Dashraath P, Wong JLJ, Lim MXK, Lim LM, Li S, Biswas A, et al. Corona- virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222:521–31.
7. Chen R, Zhang Y, Huang L, Cheng BH, Xia ZY, Meng QT. Safety and efficacy of different anesthetic regimens for parturients with COVID-19 undergoing Cesarean delivery: A case series of 17 patients. Can J An- aesth 2020;67:655–63.
8. Kim WH, Hur M, Park SK, Yoo S, Lim T, Yoon HK, et al. Comparison be- tween general, spinal, epidural, and combined spinal-epidural anesthe- sia for cesarean delivery: A network meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth 2019;37:5–15.
9. Arslan B, Ozturk NK, Onuk ZAA, Karsli B. Factors affecting selection of anesthesia type in elective cesarean operations and pregnant prefer- ences for anesthesia outcome. Med Sci 2019;8:113
10. World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control of epidem- ic- and pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections in health care. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/infection-preven- tion-and-control-of-epidemic-and-pandemic-prone-acute-respiratory-in- fections-in-health-care. Accessed May 18, 2022.
11. Harrison L, Ramsden J, Winter S, Rocke J, Heward E. Guidance for surgical tracheostomy and tracheostomy tube change during the COVID-19 pandemic. Available at: https://www.ahns.info/wp-content/ uploads/2020/03/Guidance-for-Surgical-Tracheostomy-and-Tracheos- tomy-Tube-Change-during-the-COVID.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2022.
12. Bauer ME, Bernstein K, Dinges E, Delgado C, El-Sharawi N, Sultan P, et al. Obstetric anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anesth Analg 2020;131:7-15.
13. Bauer ME, Chiware R, Pancaro C. Neuraxial procedures in COVID-19-positive parturients: A review of current reports. Anesth Analg 2020;131:e22-4.
14. Lippi G, Plebani M, Henry BM. Thrombocytopenia is associated with se- vere coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: A meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta 2020;506:145-8.
15. Altiparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal AI, Gümüş Demi Rbi Lek S. Re- gional anesthesia in patients with suspected COVID-19 infection. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021;46:91-2.
16. Lee LO, Bateman BT, Kheterpal S, Klumpner TT, Housey M, Aziz MF, et al. Risk of epidural hematoma after neuraxial techniques in thrombo- cytopenic parturients: A report from the multicenter perioperative out- comes group. Anesthesiology 2017;126:1053-63.