Cem Harun MEYDAN, Deniz DİRİK, İnan ERYILMAZ

Liderin Güç Kaynakları ve İş Performansı Arasındaki İlişkide Pelz Etkisinin Düzenleyici Rolü

Bu çalışmada, liderin algılanan farklı güç kaynaklarının çalışanların görev ve bağlamsalperformansları üzerindeki etkisi ve bu süreçte Pelz etkisinin biçimleyici rolü araştırılmıştır. Pelzetkisi, liderin etkililiğinin ve çalışanları örgütsel amaç başarımlarına yöneltme gücünün liderinkendi üstlerini etkileme, kendini üstlerine dinletebilme ve onlardan stratejik bilgileri edinebilmegücünden bağımsız olarak ele alınamayacağını iddia eden bir önermedir. Bu bağlamda, liderinkullandığı farklı güç kaynakları (meşru, ödüllendirme, zorlayıcı, uzmanlık-bilgi, karizmatik) ile işperformansını oluşturan görev ve bağlamsal performans arasındaki farklılaşan ilişkiler Pelz etkisibağlamında kamu sektöründe çalışan 195 kişiden toplanan veriler ışığında sınanmış ve Pelzetkisinin, algılanan ödüllendirme gücü, uzmanlık-bilgi gücü ve karizmatik güç ile görev performansıarasındaki ilişkilerde biçimleyici rol oynadığı tespit edilmiştir.

The Moderating Role of Pelz Effect in the Relationship between Leader Power Sources and Job Satısfactıon

This study investigates the effect of various bases of perceived leader power on employees’ contextual and task performance, and tests for the moderating role of Pelz effect in this process. Pelz effect argues that the effectiveness and power of a leader to motivate employees towards organizational goal accomplishment are not independent of the leader’s power and ability to influence his superiors and to obtain strategic information. In this context, the relations between a leader’s various power bases (legitimate, reward, coercive, expert-information, referent) and job performance (task and contextual) as well as the moderating role of Pelz effect in this process are investigated on sample of 195 public sector employees. According to the empirical evidence, Pelz effect moderates the relations between task performance and reward power, task performance and expert-information power, and task performance and referent power. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

PDF

___

Zaleznik, A. (1998). Managers and leaders: Are they different?. Harvard Business Review on Leadership, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Yang, C., & Modell, S. (2012). Power and performance: Institutional embeddedness and performance management in a Chinese local government organization. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(1), 101-132.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leadermember exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111.
Wang, H., Law, K.S., Hackett, R.D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z.X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420-32.
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees’ performance an empirical examination of two competing models. Personnel Review, 36(5), 661-683.
Soltani, E., & Liao, Y.Y. (2010). The application of Pelz effect to managing TQM Programmes. POMS 21st Annual Conference, 7-10 Mayıs 2010, Vancouver, Kanada.
Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., & Bernstein, J. (2013). Power tactic usage by gender at work and home: past, present, and future. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24(3), 307- 324.
Sargut, A. S. (2015). Kültürlerarası farklılaşma ve yönetim.Ankara, İmge Kitabevi.
Raven, B.H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualising and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 28(4), 307-332.
Raven, B. H. (2001). Power/interaction and interpersonal influence: experimental investigations and case studies”, A. Y. Lee-Chai, & J. A. Bargh (Ed.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 217-240), Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227-251.
Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217-244.
Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A.W., & Raven, B.H. (2012). Motivational underpinnings of social influence in work settings: Bases of social power and the need for cognitive closure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 41-52.
Pierro, A., Cicero, L., & Raven, B. H. (2008). Motivated compliance with bases of social power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1921-1944.
Pelz, D. C. (1951). Leadership within a hierarchical organization. Journal of Social Issues, 7, 49-55.
Pelz, D. (1952). Influence: A key to effective leadership in the first line supervisor. Personnel, 29, 209-217.
Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71-83.
Mittal, R., & Elias, S. M. (2016). Social power and leadership in cross-cultural context. Journal of Management Development, 35(1), 58-74.
Meydan, C.H. ve Polat, M. (2010). Liderin güç kaynakları üzerine kültürel bağlamda bir araştırma. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 65(4), 123-140.
Meydan, C. H. (2010). Örgüt kültürü, örgütsel güç ve örgütsel adalet algılarının bireyin iş tatmini ve örgüte bağlılığı üzerine etkisi: Kamuda bir araştırma, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Kara Harp Okulu (KHO), Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
MacKenzie, S., Podsakoff, P., & Gregory, A., (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 115-134.
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Koslowsky M, Schwarzwald J., & Ashuri S. (2001). On the relationship between subordinates’ compliance to power sources and organisational attitudes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 455-476.
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a metaanalytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.
Jawahar, I.M., & Carr D.(2007). Conscientiousness and contextual performance: The compensatory effects of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 330-349.
Jain, A. K., Giga, D. S. I., & Cooper, C. L. (2010). Social power as a means of increasing personal and organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(3), 412–432.
Jablin, F. M. (1980). Superior’s upward influence, satisfaction, and openness in superiorsubordinate communication: A reexamination of the ‘Pelz effect’. Human Communication Research, 6, 210-220.
House, R.J., & Aditya, R.N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis?. Journal of Management, 23(3), 409-473.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The basis of power, D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 529-569), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, G.R., & Rowland, K.M. (1981). Leadership, job perceptions, and influence: a conceptual integration. Human Relations, 34, 1069-78.
Elias, S. (2008). Fifty years of influence in the workplace: The evolution of the French and Raven power taxonomy. Journal of Management History, 14(3), 267-283.
Dirik, D., Eryılmaz, İ. ve Gülova, A. (2016). Liderin güç kaynakları, iş tatmini ve bağlamsal performans arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel politikanın rolü. 4.Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi, 4-5 Kasım 2016, Adana.
Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659-669.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life, New York: John Wiley.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. İçinde M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Ed.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 49-80). San Diego: Academic Press.
Bağcı, Z. (2014). Çalışanların iş doyumunun görev ve bağlamsal performansları üzerindeki etkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 24, 58-72.
Anderson, L.R., Tolson, J., Fields, M.J, & Thacker, J.W. (1990). Job autonomy as a moderator of the Pelz effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(5), 707-708.
Anderson, L. R., & Tolson, J. (1991). Leaders' upward influence in the organization: Replication and extensions of the Pelz effect to include group support and self-monitoring. Small Group Research, 22, 59-75.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.