Kamusal Hizmet Olarak Cezaevi Hizmetlerinin Özelleştirilmesi ve Türkiye'de Özel Sektör Cezaevlerinin Uygulanabilirliği

Cezaevlerinin özelleştirilmesi, yeni bir uygulama olmamakla birlikte; özellikle son yıllarda uygulanabilirliği sık tartışılır hale gelmiştir. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, İngiltere gibi birkaç ülkede görülen özel sektör cezaevleri hem maliyet etkinlik hem de devletin fonksiyonları bağlamında ele alınmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, cezaevi hizmetlerinin özelleştirilme mantığı ve bu bağlamda Türkiye’de özel sektör cezaevlerinin uygulanabilirliği incelenmektedir.

Privatization of Prison Services as a Public Service and Applicability of Private Sector Prisons in Turkey

Private prison implementation is not a new one, but nowadays applicability of private prisons have been frequently discussed. Private prisons that are seen in a few countries like USA and England are discussed in the context of both cost-efficiency and functions of the state. In this study, the reason of privatization of prison services and the applicability of private prisons in Turkey are investigated.

PDF

___

ADALET BAKANLIĞI CEZA VE TEVKİFEVLERİ GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ(2006), Ceza İnfaz Kurumlarında Donanım ve Fiziki Yapılanma. Ankara.
BIÇAK, Vahit (2001), ‘‘Hürriyeti Bağlayıcı Cezaları İnfaz Sistemi: Kamu Sektörü-Özel Sektör İlişkisi’’. 21. Yüzyıla Girerken Cezaların İnfazı Sempozyumu.21-22 Ocak 2000, Adalet Bakanlığı, Yayın İşleri Dairesi Başkanlığı, Özel Seri:4, Ankara, 199-208.
BLAKELY, C.R. ve V.W. BUMPHUS, Vic W. (2004), ‘‘Private and Public Sector Prisons- A Comparison of Select Characteristics’’. Federal Probation. A journal of correctional Philosophy and Practice, Administrative Office of US Courts, Vol 68, No1, June: 27-31.
BROWN, Allan (1994), ‘‘Economic Aspects of Prison Privatisation: The Queensland Experience’’. Private Sector and Community Involvement in theCriminal Justice System : proceedings of a conference held 30 November - 2 December 1992, Wellington, NewZealand Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, (AIC Conference Proceedings; no. 23), 103-117.
CLEMENT, Douglas (2002), ‘‘Private vs. Public: The Prison Debate’’. Fedgazette. Jan, Vol. 14, Issue 1: 8.
DEMİRBAŞ, Timur (2003), İnfaz Hukuku, Özellikle Cezaevlerinin Tarihçesi, UluslararasıBelgelerle Karşılaştırmalı Olarak Hürriyeti Bağlayıcı Cezaların İnfazı ve Ceza İnfaz Kurumlarının İdaresi. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
DEMİRBAŞ, Timur (2005), ‘‘Hürriyeti Bağlayıcı Cezaların ve Cezaevlerinin Evrimi’’. E. NASKALİ, H. OYTUN ALTUN (Ed.), Hapishane Kitabı. İstanbul: Kitabevi, 3-40.
DOLOVICH, Sharon (2005), ‘‘State Punishment And Private Prisons’’. UCLA School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series Research Paper. No. 06-12, Duke Law Journal.Volume 55, Number 3, December: 439-548.
DONAHUE, John D. (1988), Prisons for Profit: Public Justice, Private Interests. Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute.
DÖNMEZER, S. ve S. ERMAN (1999), Nazari ve Tatbiki Ceza Hukuku Genel Kısım Cilt II. 12. Bası, İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
GENDERS, Elaine (2002), ‘‘Legitimacy, Accountability and Private Prisons’’. Punishment & Society. Vol. 4, No. 3: 285-303.
GENDERS, Elaine (2003), ‘‘Privatization and Innovation- Rhetoric and Reality: The Development of a Therapeutic Community Prison’’. The Howard Journal. Vol. 42, No. 2, May: 137-157.
GÜVEL, Enver Alper (2004), Suç ve Ceza Ekonomisi. Ankara: Roma Yayınları.
HART, O., A. SHLEIFER, R.W. VISHNY (1996), ‘‘The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons’’. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. NBER Working Paper 5744, September.
HÜRRİYET GAZETESİ (1998),‘‘Cezaevlerinin Özelleştirilmesi Hazine’ye Takıldı’’. 10.04. 1998
LOGAN, Charles H. (1990) Private Prisons: Cons and Pros. New York: Oxford University Pres, Inc.
MAGHAN, Jess, (1998), ‘‘Cell Out: Renting Out The Responsibility For The Criminally Confined?’’. http://www.jmfcc.com/celloutarticle.htm.
MAYS, G. Larry (2000), ‘‘Correctional Privatization’’. Privatization in the Social Services Conference Proceedings. October 16 - 18, Chapter Eight,pp.126-144, The University of Pennsylvania, School of Social Work, Philadephia,
NATHAN, Stephen (2005), ‘‘The European Market for Privatised Correctional Services: Developments and Implications’’. Workshop at the EPSU Standing Committee on National and European Administration on Prison Services. Luxembourg, 19 May, http://www.epsu.org/IMG/pdf/PSIRUprisonreport2005.pdf.
SAĞLAM, M. Yılmaz (2003) ‘‘Ceza İnfaz Kurumları Mimarisi ve Türk İnfaz Sisteminde Mimari Özellikler’’. Adalet Dergisi. Yıl: 94, Sayı: 14, Ocak: 6-27.
SCHWARTZ, M. D., D.M. NURGE (2004), ‘‘Capitalist Punishment: Ethics and Private Prisons’’. Critical Criminology. 12: 133-156.
SHICHOR, David (1993), ‘‘The Corporate Context of Private Prisons’’. Crime, Law and Social Change. Vol:20: 113-138.
SHICHOR, David (1998), ‘‘Private Prisons in Perspective: Some Conceptual Issues’’. The Howard Journal. Vol. 37, No. 1, February: 82-100.
SHICHOR, David (1999), ‘‘Privatizing Correctional Institutions: An Organizational Perspective’’. The Prison Journal. Vol. 79 No. 2, June: 226-249.
SHICHOR, David (2000), ‘‘Penal Policies At The Threshold of The Twenty-first Century’’. Criminal Justice Review. Volume 25, Number 1, Spring: 1-30.
SHICHOR, D., D.K. SECHREST (2002), ‘‘Privatization And Flexibility: Legal and Practical Aspects of Interjurisdictional Transfer of Prisoners’’. The Prison Journal. Vol. 82 No. 3, September: 386-407.
SMITH, P.D ve K. NATALIER (2004), Understanding Criminal Justice: Sociological Perspectives. Sage Publications Inc.
SWANSON, Megan (2002), ‘‘The Private Prison Debate: A Look into the Efficiency of Private Prisons vs. Public Prisons’’. Major Themes in Economics. Spring: 97-113.
VARDALIS, J. J. ve F.W. BECKER (2000), ‘‘Legislative Opinions Concerning the Private Operation of State Prisons: The Case of Florida’’. Criminal Justice Policy Review. Volume 11, Number 2, June: 136-148.
WHITE, Ahmed A. (2001), ‘‘Rule of Law and The Limits of Sovereignty: The Private Prison in Jurisprudential Perspective’’. American Criminal Law Review. Vol. 38, No:1, Wint: 111-146.