Seda Karabulut, Oya Korkmaz, Yusuf Sağıroğlu, İlknur Keskin

Dondurulmuş Ejekülat ve Dondurulmuş Testiküler Spermin Sonuçlarının İntrasitoplazmik Sperm Enjeksiyonu (ICSI) Parametrelerine Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Çalışmamızda, dondurulmuş ejekülat ve dondurulmuş testiküler spermin İntrasitoplaz - mik Sperm Enjeksiyonu (ICSI) sonuçları üzerine etkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamızda 11.10.2016- 12.09.2017 tarihleri arasında infertilite nedeniyle ICSI tedavisine alınan ve spermleri dondurulan 36 çift çalışmaya alınmıştır. Hastaların 14 tanesine ejekülat sperm kriyoprezervasyonu, 22 tanesine de micro testiküler sperm ekstraksiyonu (TESE) sperm kriyoprezervasyonu gerçekleştirilmiştir. İki grubun ICSI sonuçları (fertilizasyon oranı, embriyo gelişme oranı ve gebelik oranları) karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Sperm parametreleri değerlendirildi- ğinde ejekülat ve TESE spermlerinde dondurma ön- cesi ve dondurma sonrası toplam motilite ve canlılık oranları arasında istatistiksel bir fark belirlenme - miştir (>0.05). Fertilizasyon oranları, implantasyon oranları ve embriyo gelişme oranları arasında ista - tistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark gözlemlenmemiştir (>0.05). Gebelik oranları ise dondurulmuş ejekülat grubunda dondurulmuş testiküler sperm grubuna oranla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunmuştur (

Evaluation of the Effect of Frozen Ejaculate and FrozenTesticular Sperm Results on Inrtacytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Parameters

Objective:The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of frozen ejaculate and frozen testicular sperm on ICSI results. Materials and Methods: 36 infertile couples that underwent an ICSI cycle and that the semen samples were frozen between 11.10.2016-12.09.2017 in were included in the study. Ejaculate sperm cryo- preservation was performed in 14 patients and mi - cro TESE sperm cryopreservation was performed in 22 patients.ICSI results (fertilization rate, embryo development rate and pregnancy rates) of the two groups were compared. Results: There were no statistically significant difference between total motility and viability rates before and after freezing in ejaculate and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) sperm (> 0.05). When ICSI parameteres were compared nostatistically signifi - cant difference were observed between fertilization rates, implantation rates and embryo development rates (> 0.05). But pregnancy rates were found sta - tistically significantly higher in frozen ejaculate group than frozen testicular sperm group (

PDF

___

1. Wetzels AMM, Bras M. Lens JW, et al. Laboratory as - pects of in vitro fertilization. Cryopreservation/Theory 1996;229-244.
2. Delilbaşı L. A’dan Z’ye Tüp Bebek Laboratuvar. İstanbul Veri Medikal Yayıncılık, 2008; 229-258.
3. Anger JT, Gilbert BR, Goldstein M. Cryopreservation of sperm: indications, methods and results. J Urol 2003; 1701079-84.
4. Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, et al. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques: Laboratory and Clini- cal Perspectives First Edition. Martin Dunitz, 2001.
5. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, et al. Pregnancies after int- racytoplasmic injection of a single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992; 3408810: 17-8.
6. Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:131-5.
7. Popal W, Nagy ZP. Laboratory processing and intracy- toplasmic sperm injection using epididymal and testicu - lar spermatozoa: what can be done to improve outcomes? Clinics 2013;68: 125-30.
8. Van Steirteghem AC, Liu J, Joris H, et al. Highersuccess rate by intracytoplasmic sperm injection than by subzona- linsemination. Report of a second series of 300 consecuti- ve treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1055-60.
9. Polge C, Smith AU, Parkes AS. Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydratation at low temperatures. Nature 1949; 164:666-70.
10. Englert Y, Delvigne A, Vekemans M, et al. Should one use fresh or frozen sperm in in-vitro fertilization with donors? Acta Urol Belg 1989; 57:83-91.
11. Borges E, Rossi LM, Locambo de Freitas CV, et al. Fer - tilization and pregnancy outcome after intracytoplasmic injection with fresh or cryopreserved ejaculated sperma - tozoa. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 316–20.
12. Kuczynski W, Dhont M, Grygoruk C, et al. The outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of fresh and cryopreser - ved ejaculated spermatozoa—a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2109–13.
13. Romero J, Remohi J, Minguez Y, et al. Fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with cryopreserved tes - ticular spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 877–879.
14. Gil-Salom M, Romero J, Minguer Y, et al. Pregnancies af- ter intracytoplasmic sperm injection with cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1309–1313.
15. Hessel M, Robben JC, D’Hauwers KW, et al. The influence of sperm motility and cryopreservation on the treatment outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection following testicular sperm extraction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94:1313-21.
16. Hauser R, Yogev L, Amit A, et al. Severe hypospermato - genesis in cases of nonobstructive azoospermia: should we use fresh or frozen testicular spermatozoa? J Androl 2005;26:772-8.
17. Levron J, Madgar I, Shefi S, et al. IVF outcome with cryop- reserved testicular sperm. Andrologia 2011;43:48-51.
18. Karacan M, Alwaeely F, Erkan S, et al. Outcome of int - racytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with fresh testicu - lar spermatozoa obtained on the day of or the day before oocyte collection and with cryopreserved testicular sperm in patients with azoospermia. Fertil Steril 2013 ;100:975- 80.
19. Tsai YR, Lan KC, Kung FT, et al. The effect of advan - ced paternalage on the outcomes of assisted reproducti- ve techniques among patients with azoospermia using cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2013;52:351-5.
20. Tournaye H. Use of testicular sperm for the treat - ment of male infertility. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1997;11:53-62.
21. Ravizzini P, Carizza C, Abdelmassih V, et al. Microdis - section testicular sperm extraction and IVF-ICSI outco - me in nonobstructive azoospermia. Andrologia 2008; 40: 219–226.
22. Hauser R, Bibi G, Yogev L, et al. Virtual azoospermia and cryptozoospermia-fresh/frozen testicular or ejaculate sperm for better IVF outcome? J Androl 2011;32:484-90.