İÇ ve DIŞ FİNANSMAN KAYNAKLARININ AR-GE HARCAMALARINA ETKİSİ: BIST’E KOTE AR-GE YOĞUN ŞİRKETLER ÜZERİNE DİNAMİK PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ (2006-2015)

Yeni bilgiler üreterek verimliliğin artmasını sağlayan inovasyon, rekabetin her geçen gün daha fazla yoğunlaştığı küresel ekonomide işletmeler için oldukça stratejik bir faaliyet haline gelmiştir. İnovasyon performansının ölçülmesinde en sık kullanılan göstergelerden biri olan araştırma-geliştirme (AR-GE) harcamaları, ilgili yatırımların kendine has özellikleri nedeniyle farklı finansman dinamiklerine sahip olabilmektedir. Bu noktada AR-GE harcamaları ve başlıca finansman kaynakları arasındaki ilişki önemli hale gelmektedir. Çalışmada, Borsa İstanbul’a (BIST) kote AR-GE yoğun şirketlerin 2006-2015 dönemi verileri kullanılarak AR-GE harcamalarının bağımlı değişken olarak yer aldığı dinamik panel veri analizi yapılmıştır. Arellano-Bond fark genelleştirilmiş momentler yöntemi (GMM) tahmincisinin kullanıldığı analiz sonuçları; AR-GE harcamalarının bir dönem gecikmeli değerinden, borçlanmadan kaynaklanan nakit akışlarından, şirket yaşından ve satışlardan pozitif, iç kaynaklardan sağlanan nakit akışlarından ve şirket büyüklüğünden negatif olarak etkilendiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, AR-GE yatırımlarının ağırlıkla borç ile finanse edildiğini ve AR-GE yoğun şirketlere sağlanacak düşük faiz oranlı ve esnek geri ödemeli AR-GE kredilerinin ilgili harcamaları artırabileceğini göstermektedir.    

___

  • • Acemoğlu, D., Akcigit, U., Bloom, N. ve Kerr, W. R., (2013), Innovation, Reallocation and Growth (NBER Working Paper No. 18993), https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/10646424/13-088.pdf?sequence=1 (7.2.2017).
  • • Aghion, P. ve Howitt, P., (1992), A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction, Econometrica, 60 (2), 323-351.
  • • Anderson, T. W. ve Hsiao, C., (1982), Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data, Journal of Econometrics, 18 (1), 47-82.
  • • Arellano, M. ve Bond, S., (1991), Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, The Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), 277-297.
  • • Arellano, M. ve Bover, O., (1995), Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-components Models, Journal of Econometrics, 68 (1), 29-51.
  • • Asteriou, D. ve Hall, S.G., (2007), Applied Econometrics, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  • • Atkinson, R. ve Wial, H., (2008), Boosting Productivity, Innovation and Growth Through a National Innovation Foundation, http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/files/rc/reports/2008/04_federal_role_atkinson_wial/nif%20report.pdf (9.2.2017).
  • • Baltagi, B. H., (2005), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley&Sons, Wiltshire.
  • • Binder, M., Hsiao, C. ve Pesaran, M. H., (2005), Estimation and Inference in Short Panel Vector Autoregressions with Unit Roots and Cointegration, Econometric Theory, 21 (4), 795-837.
  • • Bloch, C., (2005), R&D Investment and Internal Finance: The Cash Flow Effect, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14 (3), 213-223.
  • • Blundell, R. ve Bond, S., (1998), Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Model, Journal of Econometrics, 87 (1), 115-143.
  • • Bond, S., (2002), Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice (CEMMAP Working Paper 09/02), http://www.cemmap.ac.uk/wps/cwp0209.pdf (23.2.2017).
  • • Brown, J. R., Fazzari, S. M. ve Petersen, B. C., (2009), Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom, The Journal of Finance, 64 (1), 151-185.
  • • Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G. ve Petersen, B. C., (2012), Do Financing Constraints Matter for R&D?, European Economic Review, 56 (8), 1512-1529.
  • • Chiao, C., (2002), Relationship between Debt, R&D and Physical Investment, Evidence from US Firm-level Data, Applied Financial Economics, 12 (2002), 105-121.
  • • Cincera, M., (2003), Financing Constraints, Fixed Capital and R&D Investment Decisions of Belgian Firms, P. Butzen and C. Fuss (eds), Firms’ Investment and Finance Decisions: Theory and Empirical Methodology, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 129-147.
  • • Coad, A. ve Rao, R., (2007), Firm Growth and R&D Expenditure (Papers on Economics and Evolution No. 0710), https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/31852 (11.2.2017).
  • • Coldbeck, B., (2012), The Impact of Capital Market Imperfections on Capital and R&D Investment and Financial Decisions (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Business School, The University of Hull, https://hydra.hull.ac.uk/resources/hull:6293 (17.2.2017).
  • • Elliott, W., (1971), Funds Flow vs. Expectational Theories of Research and Development Expenditures in the Firm, Southern Economic Journal, 37 (4), 409-422.
  • • Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard R. G. ve Petersen B. C., (1988), Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment, Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, 19 (1), 141-195.
  • • Galende, J. ve De La Fuente, J. M., Internal Factors Determining a Firms’s Innovative Behaviour, Research Policy, 32 (2003), 715-736.
  • • Goh, A. L. S., (2005), Towards an Innovation-driven Economy Through Industrial Policy-making: An Evolutionary Analysis of Singapore, The Innovation Journal, 10 (3), 1-33.
  • • Greene, W. H., (2003), Econometric Analysis, Pearson Education, New Jersey.
  • • Grossman, G. M. ve Helpman, E., (1991), Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth, European Economic Review, 35 (3), 517-526.
  • • Gujarati, D. N., (2003), Basic Econometrics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • • Hall, B. H. ve Lerner, J., (2010), The Financing of R&D and Innovation, B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 609-639.
  • • Hall, B. H., (1992), Investment and Research and Development at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Financing Matter? (NBER Working Paper No. 4096), http://www.nber.org/papers/w4096 (13.2.2017).
  • • Hall, B. H., (2002), The Financing of Research and Development, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18 (1), 35-51.
  • • Hall, B. H., (2006), Research and Development (Contribution to the International Ency. of Social Sciences), https://eml.berkeley.edu/~bhhall/papers/BHH06_IESS_R&D.pdf (4.2.2017).
  • • Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., Branstetter, L. ve Crepon B., (1999), Does Cash Flow Cause Investment and R&D: An Exploration Using Panel Data for French, Japanese and United States Firms in the Scientific Sector, D. Audretsch and A.R. Thurik (eds), Innovation, Industry Evolution and Employment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 129-156.
  • • Hansen, L. P., (1982), Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators, Econometrica, 50 (4), 1029-1054.
  • • Herriott, S.R., Levinthal, D. A. ve March, J. G., (1985), Learning from Experience in Organizations, American Economic Review, 75, 298-302.
  • • Himmelberg, C. P. ve Petersen, B., (1994), R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (1), 38-51.
  • • Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W. ve Rosen, H. S., (1988), Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data, Econometrica, 56 (6), 1371-1395.
  • • Hsiao, C., (2007), Panel Data Analysis-Advantages and Challenges, TEST, 16 (1), 1-22.
  • • Kerr, W. R. ve Nanda, R., (2015), Financing Innovation, Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7 (1), 445-462.
  • • Levitt, B. ve March, J. G., (1988), Organizational Learning, Annual Review of Sociology, 14 (1988), 319-340.
  • • Lucas, R. E., (1988), On The Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (1988), 3-42.
  • • National Science Board, (2012), Research&Development, Innovation, and the Science and Engineering Workforce: A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators, National Science Foundation, Arlington.
  • • OECD, (2004), Innovation in the Knowledge Economy: Implications for Education and Learning, OECD Publications, Paris.
  • • OECD, (2005), Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • • OECD, (2015), OECD Innovation Strategy 2015: An Agenda for Policy Action, https://www.oecd.org/innovation/OECD-Innovation-Strategy-2015-CMIN2015-7.pdf (21.2.2017).
  • • Porter, M. E., (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Harvard Business Review, 68 (2), 73-93.
  • • Porter, M. E., (2004), Building the Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: Findings from the Business Competitiveness Index, M. E. Porter, K. Schwab and X. Sala-i-Martin (eds), Global Competitiveness Report 2003-2004, Oxford University Press, 29-56.
  • • Romer, P. M., (1986), Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, The Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5), 1002-1037.
  • • Romer, P. M., (1990), Endogenous Technological Change, The Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5), 71-102.
  • • Roodman, D., (2006), How to Do xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata, CGDEV Working Paper No. 103), https://www.cgdev.org/files/11619_file_HowtoDoxtabond6_12_1_06.pdf (18.2.2017).
  • • Sargan, J. D., (1958), The Estimation of Economic Relationships Using Instrumental Variables, Econometrica, 26 (3), 393-415.
  • • Schumpeter, J. A., (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • • Schumpeter, J. A., (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper&Brothers, New York.
  • • Stock, J. H. ve Watson, M. W., (2011), Introduction to Econometrics, Pearson, Boston.
  • • Succurro, M. ve Costanzo, G. D., (2016), Finance and R&D Investment: A Panel Study of Italian Manufacturing Firms, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8 (8), 95-110.
  • • Succurro, M., (2014), Intangible Assets Finance: A Complementary or Substitution Effect between External and Internal Channels? Evidence from the Italian Divide, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6 (12), 1-14.
  • • Tilburg, R. V., (2009), Finance for Innovation: Policy Options for Improving the Financial Component of the Dutch Innovation System, http://sustainablefinancelab.nl/files/2015/09/Finance-for-Innovation.pdf (27.2.2017).
  • • Ughetto, E., (2008), Does Finance Matter for R&D Investment?: New Evidence from a Panel of Italian Firms, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32 (6), 907-925.
  • • Wang, P., (2009), Financial Econometrics, Routledge, New York.
  • • www.bls.gov
  • • www.borsaistanbul.com
  • • www.globalinnovationindex.org
  • • www.kap.org.tr
  • • www.tuik.gov.tr
  • • www.worldbank.org
Verimlilik Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1013-1388
  • Başlangıç: 2004
  • Yayıncı: T.C. SANAYİ VE TEKNOLOJİ BAKANLIĞI STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR VE VERİMLİLİK GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

BENEFITS OF TECHNOPARKS FOR INNOVATIVE & TECHNOLOGY-BASED ENTREPRENEURS

Mehmet CANSIZ, Bilgehan ÖZBAYLANLI

TÜRK GIDA SEKTÖRÜNÜN FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ANALİZİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YÖNTEMLERİ İLE YAPILMASI

Rıdvan MAYA, Tamer EREN

İÇ ve DIŞ FİNANSMAN KAYNAKLARININ AR-GE HARCAMALARINA ETKİSİ: BIST’E KOTE AR-GE YOĞUN ŞİRKETLER ÜZERİNE DİNAMİK PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ (2006-2015)

N.savaş DEMİRCİ

KONAKLAMA İŞLETMELERİNDE İŞ DEĞERLERİNİN İŞTEN AYRILMA NİYETİNE ETKİLERİ: İŞ-AİLE-İŞ ÇATIŞMASININ ARACI ROLÜ

Bekir Eşitti

BENEFITS OF TECHNOPARKS FOR INNOVATIVE & TECHNOLOGY-BASED ENTREPRENEURS

Mehmet CANSIZ, Bilgehan ÖZBAYLANLI

PSİKOLOJİK GÜÇLENDİRME, İŞ TATMİNİ VE ÇALIŞAN PERFORMANSI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER: TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÜNİVERSİTELER GENELİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Mübeyyen TEPE KÜÇÜKOĞLU

BOZULABİLİR GIDA TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE ÜRETİM RİSKLERİ GÖZETİLEREK ÜRETİM-DAĞITIM PLANLAMASI: BİR SÜT İŞLEME TESİSİNDE UYGULAMA

Gülşah SEZEN AKAR, Hüseyin ŞENKAYAS

ALGILANAN KURUMSAL İTİBARIN SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: MERCEDES-CHANEL ÖRNEĞİ

Gül Banu DAYANÇ KIYAT, Halil ŞİMŞEK

SAĞLIK KURUMLARINDA TIBBİ HATALARIN AZALTILMASINDA EKİP KAYNAK YÖNETİMİ YAKLAŞIMI: ANKARA İLİNDE FAALİYETTE BULUNAN BİR EĞİTİM-ARAŞTIRMA HASTANESİ AMELİYATHANE ÜNİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ

İzzet AYDEMİR, Türkan YILDIRIM

BÖLGESEL SOSYAL SERMAYE VE BÖLGESEL GELİŞMİŞLİK DÜZEYİNİN KALKINMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ

Aslı ÖZTOPCU