Toklularda programlı yem tüketiminin performans, ekonomik değerlilik ve ruminal fermantasyon üzerine etkisi
Bu çalışma, tokluların besin madde ihtiyaçlarım karşılayacak şekilde düzenlenen programlı yem tüketimi ile ad libitum yem tüketiminin canlı ağırlık artışı, yemden yararlanma, kâr marj ini ve ruminal fermantasyon üzerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada, yaklaşık 6 aylık ortalama 31 kg 22 toklu tesadüfü deneme düzeninde kullanılmıştır. Toklular ad libitum Kontrol Grubu ve besin madde ihtiyaçlarını karşılayacak düzeyde sınırlı Deneme Grubu yemleme programlarına göre beslenmişlerdir. Araştırma sonunda, yemlemeden önce ve yemlemeden sonra 2 ile 4. saatlerde üç gün boyunca rumen sıvısı örnekleri alınmıştır. Deneme grubunda yemden yararlanmada iyileşme gözlenirken, canlı ağırlık artışında gruplar arasında bir farklılık tespit edilmemiştir. Besin madde ihtiyacını karşılayacak düzeydeki programlı yem tüketimi 1 kg canlı ağırlık artışının maliyetini azaltmıştır. Rumen sıvısı pH değeri ve amonyak konsantrasyonu gruplarda benzerlik göstermiştir. Yemleme metotları ile asetik, propiyonik ve bütirik asit konsantrasyonları etkilenmemiştir. Sonuç olarak tokluların besin madde ihtiyaçlarını karşılayacak şekilde düzenlenen programlı yem tüketimi 1 kg canlı ağırlık artışının maliyetini azaltmıştır
Effect of programmed feed intake on performance, economic value, and ruminal fermentation of growing lambs
This experiment was conducted to determine the effects of ad libitum and programmed feed intake according to meeting the nutrient requirement of lambs on average daily gain, feed efficiency, profıt margins, and ruminal fermentation of growing lambs. Twenty two lambs approximately 6 mo old averaging 31 kg were used in a randomized design. Lambs were offered ad libitum access to feed Control Group and were limit-fed according to meeting nutrient requirement Treatment Group . At the termination of the study, ruminal fluid was collected 0, 2, and 4 h after feeding foı* 3 d. Feed efficiency improved in the treatment group. However, average daily gain was not different betvveen groups. Programmed feed intake at levels being able to meet the nutrient requirement decreased the cost of 1 kg live weight gain. Ruminal pH and ammonia concentrations were similar for both groups. Concentrations of acetate, propionate, and butyrate were not affected by feeding methods. The results of this investigation indicate that programmed feed intake according to meeting the nutrient requirement of lambs was reduced cost of 1 kg live weight gain
___
- 1. Graham N McC, Searle TW: Balances of energy and matter in
growing sheep at several ages, body weights, and planes of
nutrition, Aust. J.Agric. Res. 23: 97, (1972). 4.
- 2. Zinn RA, Owens FN: İnflııence of feed intake level on site of
digestion in steers fed a high concentrate diet, J.Anim.Sci. 56: 471,
(1983).
- 3. Owens F.N, Raney RY. Tıemblay JC: Influence of feed intake
level and roughage source on small intestinal strach digestion and
passage time in steers, J.Anim. Sci. 63: (Suppl. 1): 422(Abst.),
(1986b).
- 4. Zinn RA, Adam CF, Tamayo MS: Interaction of feed intake level
on compaıative ruminal and total tıact digestion of dry- rolled and
steam-flaked com, J.Anim. Sci.73: 1239, (1995).
- 5. Glimp HA, Hart SP, Von Tungeln D: Effect of altering nutrient
densitiy (concentrate to roughage ratio) and restıicting energy
intake on weight, effıciency and composition of growing lambs,
J.Anim.Sci. 67: 865, (1989).
- 6. Old CA, Garrett WN: Effect of energy intake on energetic
effıciency and body composition of beef steers differing in size at
maturity, J.Anim. Sci.65: 1371, (1987).
- 7. Hicks RB, Owens FN, Gill DR, Martin JJ, Strasia CA: Effect of
controlled feed intake on performance and carcass characteristics
of feedlot steers and heifers, J. Anim. Sci. 68:233, (1990).
- 8. Peter AP: The moorman energy-controlled grower
porgram.Symposium Proc.: Feed intake by beef cattle, Oklahoma
State Univeısty.MP-121:302, (1987).
- 9. Meyer H, Bronsch K, Leisbetseden J: Suplemente zu vorlesungen
ıınd libungen in der tieremaehrung, Verlag Sprııngmann.
Hannover, 1+245, (1984).
- 10. NRC: Nutrient Requirements of Sheep (6lh Ed.), National
Academy Press, Washington,DC (1985).
- 11. Association of Offıcial Analytical Chemists International, Offıcial
Methods of Analysis (15lh Ed.). AOAC., Arglinton, VA(1990).
- 12. Crampton EW, Maynard LA: The relation of cellulosa and lignin
content to nutritive value of animal feeds, J.Nutr. 15: 383, (1938).
- 13. Annino JS: Clinical Chemistry Little Brown and Co.,155, (1964).
- 14. Ottenstein DM, Baıtley DA: Impıoved Gas Chıomatography
separation of fıee acids C2-C5 in dilute Solutions, Anal. Chem.
43: 952, (1971).
- 15. SAS Institute, SAS® User’s Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc.,
Cary, NC. (1989).
- 16. Hicks RB. Owens FN, Gill DR, Martin JJ, Strasia CA: Effect of
controlled feed intake on performance of feedlot steers and
heifers, Oklahoma State University. MP-1 19:320, (1987).
- 17. Leaver JD, Campling RC, Holmes W: The effect of level of
feeding on the digestibility of diets for sheep and cattle, Anim.
Prod. 11:11,(1969).
- 18. Graham N, Searle TW: Studies of weaner sheep during and after a
period of weight statis. 1. Energy and nitrogen utilization, Aust.
J.Agric. Res.26: 343, (1975).
- 19. Murphy TA, Loerch SC, Smith FE: Effects of feeding highconcentıate diets at restıicted intakes on digestibility and nitrogen
metabolism in growing lambs, J.Anim. Sci. 72: 1583, (1994).
- 20. Zinn RA: Programming feed intake to optimize performance of
feedlot cattle. In. F.N. Owens (Ed.). Symposium Proceedings:
Feed intake by beef cattl,. Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Sta. M.P.
121:290, (1987).
- 21. Hart SP, Glimp HA: Effect of diet composition and feed intake
level on diet digestibility and ıuminal metabolism in grovving
lambs, J.Anim.Sci. 69:1636, (1991).
- 22. Galyaen ML, Wagner DG, Owens FN: Level of feed intake and
site and extent of digestion of high concentrate diets by steers,
J.Anim. Sci. 49:199, (1979).