___

• Carrillo-Marcos A, Salazar-Correa G, Castro-Ramirez L, vd. The Microhardness and Surface Roughness Assessment of Bulk-Fill Resin Composites Treated with and without the Application of an Oxygen-Inhibited Layer and a Polishing System: An In Vitro Study. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(15). doi:10.3390/polym14153053
• Oral F. Dental Seramiklerde Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Surface Roughness in Dental Ceramics. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. 2022; 11(1) :103–107.
• Yadav RD, Jindal D, Mathur R. A Comparative Analysis of Different Finishing and Polishing Devices on Nanofilled, Microfilled, and Hybrid Composite: A Scanning Electron Microscopy and Profilometric Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016; 9(3) :201–208. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1364
• Nasoohi N, Hoorizad M, Tabatabaei SF. Effects of Wet and Dry Finishing and Polishing on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Composite Resins. 2017;14(2).
• Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent. 2012;40:64–70. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.005
• Costa G de FA da, Fernandes ACB de CJ, Carvalho LA de O, de Andrade AC, de Assunção IV, Borges BCD. Effect of additional polishing methods on the physical surface properties of different nanocomposites: SEM and AFM study. Microsc Res Tech. 2018;81(12):1467–1473. doi:10.1002/jemt.23147.
• Avsar A, Yuzbasioglu E, Sarac D. The effect of finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness and the color of nanocomposite resin restorative materials. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015;24(5):881–890. doi:10.17219/acem/23971
• Babina K, Polyakova M, Sokhova I, Doroshina V, Arakelyan M, Novozhilova N. The effect of finishing and polishing sequences on the surface roughness of three different nanocomposites and composite/enamel and composite/cementum interfaces. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(7):1–14. doi:10.3390/nano10071339
• Ölmez A, Kisbet S. Kompozit Rezin Restorasyonlarda Bitirme Ve Polisaj İşlemlerindeki Yeni gelişmeler.Acta Odontol Turc. 2013;30(2):115–122. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gaziaot/issue/6536/86666.
• Ferraris, Federico, Conti A. No Title. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014;9(1):70–89.
• Küçükeşmen, H. Cenker, Küçükeşmen, Çiğdem, Üşümez A. Yaşlandırma prosedürünün farklı restoratif materyallerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkisi.Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilim Enstitüsü Derg. Published online 2010.
• Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozsoy A, Topcu FT. Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials. J Dent Sci. 2013;8(2):160–169. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.007
• Baseren M. Surface Roughness Of Nanofill and Nanohybrid Composite Resin And Ormocer-Based Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials After Severel Finishing And Polishing Procedures. J Biomater Appl. 2004;19(2). Doi:0885328204044011
• Chour RG, Moda A, Arora A, Arafath MY, Shetty VK, Rishal Y. Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6:166-70. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.189761
• Checketts MR, Turkyilmaz I, Asar NV. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1265–1270. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.005
• Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: Historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J. 2011;56 :84–96. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01299.x
• Fasbinder DJ. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31(9).
• Wolfart S, Eschbach S, Scherrer S, Kern M. Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: Up to 8 years results. Dent Mater. 2009;25(9):63–71. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.05.003
• Zarone F, Di Mauro MI, Ausiello P, Ruggiero G, Sorrentino R. Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):1–14. doi:10.1186/s12903-019-0838-x
• Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(1):155–163. doi:10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8
• Joniot S, Salomon JP, Dejou J, Grégoire G. Use of two surface analyzers to evaluate the surface roughness of four esthetic restorative materials after polishing. Oper Dent. 2006;31(1):39–46. doi:10.2341/04-166
• Eliades T, Gioka C, Eliades G, Makou M. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(3):333–338. doi:10.1093/ejo/26.3.333
• Çökük D. N. Tam Seramik Sistemlerine Uygulanan Farklı Polisaj Metotlarının Yüzey Pürüzlülüğüne Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009,(2), 98-104.
• Şahin C, Gülay U.Z.U.N. Cad/Cam Bloklardan Elde Edilen Restorasyonlarda Bitim İşlemlerinin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğüne Ve Sitotoksisiteye Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2020, 30,(4), 633-638.
• Yanikoglu ND, Sakarya RE. Test methods used in the evaluation of the structure features of the restorative materials: A literature review. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(5):9720–9734. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.049
• Rodriguez JM, Curtis R V., Bartlett DW. Surface roughness of impression materials and dental stones scanned by non-contacting laser profilometry. Dent Mater. 2009;25(4):500–505. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.003
• de Groot P. Interferometric laser profilometer for rough surfaces. Opt Lett. 1991;16(6):357. doi:10.1364/ol.16.000357
• Endo T, Finger WJ, Kanehira M, Utterodt A, Komatsu M. Surface texture and roughness of polished nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2010;29(2):213–223. doi:10.4012/dmj.2009-019
• Curd M. L. Bollenl, Paul Lambrechts MQ.Comparison-of-surface-roughness-of-.pdf. Dent Mater. Published online 1997:258–269.
• Park JW, An JS, Lim WH, Lim BS, Ahn SJ. Microbial changes in biofilms on composite resins with different surface roughness: An in vitro study with a multispecies biofilm model. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(5):493.1-493.8. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.009
• Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J. 2004;196(1):42–45. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4810881
• Gadegaard N. Atomic force microscopy in biology: Technology and techniques. Biotech Histochem. 2006;81(2–3):87–97. doi:10.1080/10520290600783143
• V T. Restoratif dental materyallerin yüzey mekanik özellikleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekim Fakültesi Derg. Published online 2014:77–82.
• Çelik Ümit. Sıvıda Çalışan Atomik Çözünürlüklü Yüzeye Değmeyen Atomik Kuvvet Mikroskobu. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. 2011.
• Salerno M, Giacomelli L, Derchi G, Patra N, Diaspro A. Atomic force microscopy in vitro study of surface roughness and fractal character of a dental restoration composite after air-polishing. Biomed Eng Online. 2010;9:1–11. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-9-59
• Karan S, Kircelli BH, Tasdelen B. Enamel surface roughness after debonding : Comparison of two different burs. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(6):1081–1088. doi:10.2319/012610-55.1
• Francis LW, Lewis PD, Wright CJ, Conlan RS. Atomic force microscopy comes of age. Biol Cell. 2010;102(2):133–143. doi:10.1042/bc20090127
• Abdullah A, Mohammed A. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): A Review. Proc 2018 Int Conf Hydraul Pneum - HERVEX. Published online 2019:77–85.
• Bansal. Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel : An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study. Published online 2019:154–158. doi:10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR
• Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(4):221–227. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60034-0
• Papathanasiou I, Zinelis S, Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P. Effect of aging on color, gloss and surface roughness of CAD/CAM composite materials. J Dent. 2023;130:104423. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104423
• Karatas O, Gul P, Gündoğdu M, Iskenderoglu DT. An evaluation of surface roughness after staining of different composite resins using atomic force microscopy and a profilometer. Microsc Res Tech. 2020;83(10):1251–1259. doi:10.1002/jemt.23519
• Alhabdan A. Comparison of Surface Roughness of Ceramics after Polishing with Different Intraoral Polishing Systems using Profilometer and SEM. J Dent Heal Oral Disord Ther. 2015;2(3):1–11. doi:10.15406/jdhodt.2015.02.00050
• Varol, O. Ağız gargaralarının farklı porselen sistemlerinin renk stabilitesi ve yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkilerinin incelenmesi Cumhurı̇yet Ünı̇versı̇tesı̇ Dı̇ş Hekı̇mlı̇ğı̇ Fakültesı̇, Protetı̇k Dı̇ş Tedavı̇sı̇ Anabı̇lı̇m Dalı. 2016
• Tholt B, Miranda WG, Prioli R, Thompson J, Oda M. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer. Oper Dent. 2006;31(4):442–449. doi:10.2341/05-54
• Guler S, Unal M. The Evaluation of Color and Surface Roughness Changes in Resin based Restorative Materials with Different Contents After Waiting in Various Liquids: An SEM and AFM study. Microsc Res Tech. 2018;81(12):1422–1433. doi:10.1002/jemt.23104