WHAT IS DISTINCTIVELY NEW ABOUT SO-CALLED ‘NEW’ WARS?

Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde tehdit algısı değişmiş olduğundan ötürü savaşlarla ilgili ‘yeni’ sınıflandırmaların ortaya atılması yönünde eğilimler ortaya çıkmıştır. Devletlerin içinden gelen bu tehdit yaygınlaştıkça birçok akademisyen bu tehdit üzerine çalışma yapmaya başlamıştır. Genel olarak ulaşılan konsensüs bunun farklı bir tür savaş olduğudur. Bununla birlikte, Kalevi Holsti (1996) bunu üçüncü tür savaş olarak adlandırırken; Martin Van Creveld (1991) Düşük-yoğunluklu Çatışma olarak nitelendirmiş ve Mary Kaldor (1999) yeni savaş kullanımını tercih etmiştir. Bu makale Mary Kaldor’un ‘yeni savaş’ konseptini temel alarak bu yeni tehdidin eski savaşlardan farklarını açıklamaya çalışacaktır. Diğer taraftan, Edward Newman ve Stathis N. Kalyvas gibi bazı akademisyenler de modern dünyada yeni savaşların olmadığını savunmaktadırlar. Onlara göre yeni olduğu iddia edilen özellikler aslında eski savaşların özellikleridir. Bu noktada, bu makale yeni savaşların gerçekten yeni olup olmadığını sorgulayacaktır. Bu bağlamda ilk olarak eski ve yeni savaşların özellikleri incelenecek ve bu özellikler karşılaştırılarak ‘yeni savaş’ların ayırt edici özelliklerinin var olup var olmadığına bakılacaktır.

WHAT IS DISTINCTIVELY NEW ABOUT SO-CALLED ‘NEW’ WARS?

In the post-Cold war era, there has been a growing tendency to suggest the classification of ‘new’ wars, since the perception of the threat has changed. Since threats coming from within states have recently become dominant, many scholars have studied this development. The consensus they have reached is that this type of threat represents a different kind of war. Kalevi Holsti has named it a third kind of war (1996); Martin van Creveld has named it ‘Low-Intensity Conflict’ (1991); and Mary Kaldor has named it ‘new war’ (1999). This article will embrace Mary Kaldor’s ‘new war’ concept and use it to analyse and describe this different kind of war and compare it with old wars. In contrast to these aforementioned arguments, some scholars, such as Edward Newman and Stathis N. Kalyvas, have argued that there are no new wars in the contemporary world. According to them, many features of the so-called new wars can be seen in old wars. This paper also aims to unfold whether the new wars are in fact new or not. To better observe this, first the characteristics of new wars and old wars will be considered and then they will be compared to find out what is distinctively new about so-called new wars.

___

  • Aviv, E. (2016), Millet System in the Ottoman Empire, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195390155-0231
  • Bellamy, A. J. (2006) “No pain, no gain? Torture and ethics in the war on terror”, International Affairs Vol. 82 (1), pp. 121-148.
  • Bluth, C. (1987), “The British Resort to Force in the Falklands/Malvinas Conflict 1982: International Law and Just War Theory”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 24 (1), pp. 5-20.
  • Brocklehurst, H. (2007), “Childhood In Conflict: Can The Real Child Soldier Please Stand Up?”, www.ccels.cf.ac.uk/archives/publications/2008/brocklehurst.pdf
  • Brzoska, M. (2004), “New Wars Discourse in Germany”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 41 (1), pp. 107-117.
  • Chojnacki, S. (2006), “Anything new or more of the same? Wars and military intervention in the international system 1946–2003”, Global Society, Vol. 20 (1), pp. 25–46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600820500405442.
  • Chomsky, N. (1999), The New Military Humanism: Lessons From Kosovo, London: Pluto Press.
  • Creveld, M. V. (1991), The Transformation of War: The Most Radical Reinterpretation of Armed Conflict Since Clausewitz, New York: The Free Press.
  • Duffield, M. (2001), Global Governance and The New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security, London: Zed Books.
  • Enzensberger, H. M. (1992), Civil War, Penguin Books: London.
  • Gilbert, P. (2003), New Terror, New Wars, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Goerzig, C. (2005), “Preventing the New Wars – A Proactive Approach to the Privatisation and Commercialisation of Violence”, BSIS Journal of International Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 130-150.
  • Hables Gray, C. (1997), Post-modern war: The new politics of conflict, London: Routledge.
  • Henderson, E A and Singer, D. (2002), ‘New wars’ and rumours of ‘new wars’, International Interactions, Vol. 28 (2), pp. 165-190. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050620212098.
  • Holsti, K. (1991), Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Holsti, K. (1992), “International Theory and War in the Third World.” In Brian Job (ed.), The Insecurity Dilemma: National Security of Third World States, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner;
  • Holsti, K. (1996), The State, War and the State of War, Cambridge Studies in International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holsti, K. (1997), “International Theory and Domestic War in the Third World: The Limits of Relevance.” Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association, Toronto, Canada, March.
  • Kaldor, M. (1999), New & Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, 1st edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Kaldor, M. (2007), New & Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Kaldor, M. (2012), New & Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, 3rd edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Kaldor, M. (2013), In Defence of New Wars, Stability, Vol. 2 (1), pp. 1-16, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/sta.at
  • Kalyvas, S. N. (2001), “‘New’ And ‘Old’ Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction?”, World Politics, Vol.54, pp. 99-118.
  • Kinsella, H. M. (2005), “Discourses of difference: civilians, combatants, and compliance with the laws of war”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 31, pp. 163–185.
  • Lazar, S. (2017), "War", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .
  • Metz, S. (1997), Strategic Horizons: The Military Implications of alternative Futures, Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.
  • Newman, E. (2004), “The ‘New Wars’ Debate: A Historical Perspective Is Needed”, Security Dialogue, Vol. 35 (2), pp. 173-189.
  • Sarkees, M. R. (2010), Codebook for the Intra-State Wars v.4.0.: Definitions and Variables, Correlates of War.
  • Shaw, M. (2000), “The contemporary mode of warfare?”, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 7 (1), pp. 171-180, http://users.sussex.ac.uk/~hafa3/kaldor.htm
  • Sheehan, M. (2008), “The Changing Character of War”, in J. Baylis, S. Smith, and P. Qwens (eds.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Fourth edition, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 210-225.
  • Small, Melvin and J. David Singer (1982). Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816–1980, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Smith, R, (2005), The Utility of Force, London: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Von Clausewitz, C. (1989), On War, (Edited and Translated by Howard Michael and Paret Peter), Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Wallström, M. and Zerrougui, L., (2017), Ending the Use of Child Soldiers, http://www.swemfa.se/2017/02/12/ending-the-use-of-child-soldiers/
  • Wayman, F. W.; Sarkees, M. R.; Singer, J. D. (2005), “Inter-State, Intra-State, Extra-State, and Non-State Wars, 1816-2004”, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p72020_index.html
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1307-9832
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2008
  • Yayıncı: Kenan ÇELİK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

PANEL VERİ ZARFLAMA ANALİZİ İLE OECD ÜLKELERİNİN 2008 KÜRESEL KRİZİ ÖNCESİ VE SONRASI KAYNAK KULLANIM ETKİNLİKLERİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI

MİRAÇ EREN, Aytan AGHABAYOVA

NAKİT BULUNDURMA POLİTİKASI DİNAMİKLERİ: BIST TEKSTİL ENDEKSİ FİRMALARI ÜZERİNE STATİK VE DİNAMİK PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

EMRE ESAT TOPALOĞLU

MUHASEBE MESLEK MENSUPLARININ DUYGUSAL TÜKENME VE MESLEKTEN AYRILMA NİYETLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE MESLEK MEMNUNİYETİNİN ARA DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ

Gökhan ÖZER, MEHMET GÜNLÜK, Setenay YÜKSEL

WHAT IS DISTINCTIVELY NEW ABOUT SO-CALLED ‘NEW WARS’?

ÖZGÜR TÜFEKÇİ

ULUSLARARASI ÇEŞİTLENDİRMENİN PORTFÖY PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ: GELENEKSEL VE İSLAMİ HİSSE SENEDİ PİYASALARI İÇİN AMPİRİK BİR UYGULAMA

MUSTAFA UYSAL, MUSTAFA EMİR

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK EKSENİNDE MANİSA CELAL BAYAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NİN KARBON AYAK İZİNİN HESAPLANMASINA YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Gül BİNBOĞA, Aylin ÜNAL

TÜRKİYE’DE KADIN İSTİHDAMI VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: SİMETRİK VE ASİMETRİK NEDENSELLİK TESTLERİ İLE SEKTÖREL BİR ANALİZ

UĞUR KORKUT PATA

DESTİNASYON REKABETÇİLİĞİ ENDEKSİ ÖNERİSİ

ERSİN BURNAZ, Hasan AYYILDIZ

LOJİSTİK MALİYETLER ÇERÇEVESİNDE KARADENİZ LİMANLARININ MULTİMODAL TAŞIMACILIĞA UYGUNLUKLARININ ANALİZİ

ÖMER FARUK GÖRÇÜN, ÖZHAN GÖRÇÜN

BİLEŞİK ÖNCÜ GÖSTERGELERİN BORSA İÇİN ÖNCÜ OLMA ÖZELLİĞİ: G7 VE E7 ÜLKELERİNDE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ANALİZ

MÜSLÜM POLAT, ERAY GEMİCİ