___

• Akıntürk, Esen ve Baklacı, Pınar, ‘İki Taraflı Yatırım Antlaşmaları Hakkında Genel Bir İnceleme’, Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, Aralık 2009, Cilt XXV, Sayı 4, s. 477-536.
• Baklacı, Pınar ve Akıntürk, Esen, ‘Enerji Şartı Antlaşması’, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 7, Sayı 2, 2006, s. 97-113.
• Baklacı, Pınar ve Akıntürk, Esen, ‘Enerji Şartı Antlaşması’na Göre Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Yolları’, Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, Aralık 2007, Cilt XXIV, Sayı 2, s. 305-345.
• Baklacı, Pınar, ‘Uluslararası Yatırımlarda ‘Dolaylı Kamulaştırma’ ve Düzenleyici Yetkiler’,Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, Yıl 28, Sayı 1-2, 2008, s.1-25.
• Baklacı, Pınar, Uluslararası Yatırım Hukukunda En Çok Gözetilen Ulus Muamelesi, (İstanbul: Beta Basım AŞ, 2009).
• Bamberger, Craig S., ‘An Overview of the Energy Charter Treaty’, içinde Thomas W.Wälde (ed.), The Energy Charter Treaty: An East-West Gateway for Investment and Trade, (Londra: Kluwer Law International Ltd., 1996), s.1-34.
• Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, Sixth Edition, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).
• Çal, Sedat, Uluslararası Yatırım Tahkimi ve Kamu Hukuku İlişkisi, (Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2009).
• D’Allaire, Dominique, ‘Nationality Rules under the Energy Charter Treaty: Practical Considerations, The Journal of World Investment and Trade, Volume 10, 2009, s. 39-68.
• Demir, Esra, ‘Enerji Şartı Antlaşması’ Uluslararası Ekonomik Sorunlar Dergisi, Sayı VIII,Şubat 2003, s. 29-36, http://www.mfa.gov.tr/enerji-sarti-anlasmasi.tr.mfa, (erişim: 30 Ocak 2011).
• Dolzer Rudolf and Schreuer Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
• Draft text of the Supplementary Treaty, http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_uploa d/document/Draft_ST_text_ENG.pdf, (erişim: 13 Temmuz 2010).
• Dost Süleyman, ‘Adil ve Hakkaniyetli Davranış Yükümlülüğü Bağlamında PSEG/Konya Ilgın Elektrik-Türkiye Tahkim Kararı (ICSID)’, İstanbul Barosu Dergisi, Cilt 81, Sayı 3, Yıl 2007, s. 1071-1088.
• Elshihabi Saamir, ‘The Difficulty Behind Securing Sector-Specific Investment Establishment Rights: The Case of Energy Charter’, The International Lawyer, Vol.35, No.1, 2001, s. 137-158.
• Energy Charter, http://www.encharter.org , (erişim: 30 Mart 2011).
• Energy Charter Secretariat, ‘The Energy Charter Treaty and Related Documents, A Legal Framework for International Energy Cooperation’, September 2004,
• http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/document/EN.pdf, (erişim: 30 Ocak 2011).
• Energy Charter Secretariat, ‘The Blue Book, Making Investments in Energy Charter Member Countries, Exceptions to the Principle of Non-Discriminatory Treatment’, November 2009. http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/document/Blue_ Book_ENG.pdf, (erişim: 13 Ekim 2010).
• ‘Ensuring Investment in Secure and Sustainable Energy: Benefits of Multilateral Action,28 May 2009, Headquarters of European Investment Bank’, Luxembourg, Conference Report, http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Conferences/2009_May/Lux2009-report.pdf, (erişim 23 Ekim 2010).
• Gaillard Emmanuel, ‘Investments and Investors Covered by the Energy Charter Treaty’,içinde Clarisse Ribeiro (ed.), Investment Arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty,(New York, JuristNet, LLC, 2006), s. 54-73.
• Heiskanen Veijo, ‘“Unreasonable or Discriminatory Measures” as a Cause of Action Under the Energy Charter Treaty’, International Arbitration Law Review, 2007, 10 (3), s. 104-110.
• Hober Kaj, ‘Investment Arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol.1, No.1, 2010, s. 153-190.
• Hoffmann Anne K., ‘Indirect Expropriation’, içinde August Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), s. 151-170.
• Kriebaum Ursula, ‘Regulatory Takings: Balancing the Interests of the Investor and the State’, The Journal of World Investment and Trade, Volume 8, October 2007, Number 5, s, 717-744.
• Kolo Abba and Wälde Thomas, ‘Capital Transfer Restrictions under Modern Investment Treaties’, içinde August Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), s. 205-243.
• Konoplyanik Andrei, and Wälde Thomas, ‘Energy Charter Treaty and its Role in International Energy’, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, Vol. 24, No. 4,2006, s. 523-558.
• Marshall Fiona, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Agreements’,Issues in International Investment Law, Background Papers for the Developing Country Investment Negotiators’ Forum, Singapore 1-2, 2007, International Institute for Sustainable Development, http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2007/inv_fair_treatment.pdf(erişim 20 Mart 2011).
• Mistelis Loukas A. and Baltag Mihaela Crina, ‘Denial of Benefits and Article 17 of the Energy Charter Treaty’, Penn State Law Review, Vol. 113: 4, 2008-2009, s. 1301-1322.
• Moss Giuditta Cordero, ‘Full Protection and Security’, içinde August Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), s.131-150.
• Newcombe Andrew and Paradell Lluis., Law and Practice of Investment Treaties, Standards of Treatment, (The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2009).
• Reed Lucy and Martinez Lucy, ‘The Energy Charter Treaty: An Overview’, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol: 14:2, 2008, s.405-439.
• Reinisch August, ‘Legality of Expropriations’, içinde August Reinisch (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), s. 171-204.
• Schmid Michael, Swiss Investment Protection Agreements: Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment and Umbrella Clauses, (Zurich, 2007).
• Schreuer Christoph H., ‘The Concept of Expropriation under the ECT and other Investment Protection Treaties’, içinde Clarisse Ribeiro (ed.), Investment Arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty, (New York, JurisNet, LLC, 2006), s. 108-159.
• Schreuer Christoph H., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET): interactions with other standards’ içinde Graham Coop and Clarisse Ribeiro (eds.), Investment Protection and the Energy Charter Treaty, (JurisNet, LLC, 2008), s. 63-155.
• Schreuer Christoph, Full Protection and Security, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2010, s. 1-17.
• ‘Selected Recent Developments in IIA Arbitration and Human Rights’, IIA Monitor No. 2 (2009), International Investment Agreements, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2009, http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/webdiaeia20097_en.pdf, (erişim: 27 Aralık 2010).
• Sornarajah M., The International Law on Foreign Investment, Second Edition, (New York:Cambridge University Press, 2004).
• Subedi Surya P., International Investment Law, Reconciling Policy and Principle, (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2008).
• Tiryakioğlu Bilgin, Doğrudan Yatırımların Uluslararası Hukukta Korunması, (Ankara:Dayınlarlı Hukuk Yayınları, 2003).
• UNCTAD Series on issues in international investment agreements, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’, 1999, http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/psiteiitd11v3.en.pdf (erişim 19 Şubat 2011).
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Investment Agreements: Key Issues, Volume I, United Nations New York and Geneva, 2004, http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteiit200410_en.pdf, (erişim 08 Mart 2011).
• Wälde Thomas W., ‘International Investments Under the 1994 Energy Charter, Legal, Negotiating and Policy Implications for International Investors within Western and CIS/Eastern European countries’, CPMLP Professional Paper No. PP17, 1995,http://www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/infoserv/Downloads_Free/PP17.pdf, (erişim 26 Kasım 2010).
• Walde Thomas W., ‘Investment Arbitration Under the Energy Charter Treaty From Dispute Settlement to Treaty Implementation’, Conference on Energy-Arbitration, Gulf Arbitration Center, October 1998, http://www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/journal/h tml/Vol1/article1-10.pdf, (erişim 26 Kasım 2010).
• Wälde Thomas W. and Hobér Kaj, ‘The First Energy Charter Treaty Arbitral Award’, Journal of International Arbitration, 22 (2), 2005, s. 83-104.
• Waelde Thomas and Kolo Abba, ‘Confiscatory Taxation under Customary International Law and Modern Investment Treaties’, http://www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/journal/h tml/vol4/article4-17.html (erişim 28 Ocak 2011).
• Tahkim Kararları:
• AES Summit Generation Limited and AES-Tisza Erömü Kft. v. Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/7/22, http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Investo r-State_Disputes/Award_-_AES_vs_Hungary.pdf, (erişim 20 Mart 2011)
• Limited Liability Company Amto v. Ukraine, Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, Arbitration No: 080/2005, http://www.encharter.org/fileadm in/user_upload/Investor-State_Disputes/Amto_Ukraine_Award.pdf, (erişim 20 Mart 2011).
• Nykomb Synergetics Technology Holding AB v. Latvia, Arbitration Institute of the SCC,Case No. 118/2001. Karar için bkz., http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_u pload/Investor-State_Disputes/Nykomb.pdf, (erişim: 06 Mart 2011).
• Petrobart Limited v. The Kyrgyz Republic, Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, Arbitration No. 126/2003, http://www.encharter.org/fileadm in/user_upload/document/Petrobart.pdf, (erişim 10 Mart 2011).
• Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24, http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/document/Plama_Bulgaria_Award. pdf, (erişim 10 Mart 2011).