19056

THE DISCIPLINE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: NEW PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT

The discipline of public administration is defined as an interdisciplinary field. This aspect of public administration, which uses the theories, methods and approaches of the disciplines of political science, administrative law and business management, has recently been cited as the cause of public administration crisis. In this study, the question of whether interdisciplinary position of public administration affects discipline positively or negatively. Since the establishment of public administration, the relations with different disciplines are examined; the separation of political science and administrative law from the discipline in the foundation period and its approach to the management of the enterprise were examined. The relationship between the administration and the management of the company, which was expressed as the most affected by the discipline, was discussed and the positive and negative effects of these relations were discussed.

PDF

___

Bluntschlı, J. C. (1875). The Theory of the State, Oxford, (Printed at the Clarendon Press, London).

Drechsler, W. (2005), “The Rise and Demise of the New Public Management”, Post-Autistic Economics Review, No. 33, 14 September 2005, pp. 17-28; http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue33/Drechsler33.htm; 08.09.2011.

Eryılmaz, B. (2010). Kamu Yönetimi: Düşünceler, Yapılar, Fonksiyonlar, Okutman Yayıncılık, Ankara.

Genç, N. (2010). “Yeni Kamu Hizmeti Yaklaşımı”, Türk İdare Dergisi, S.466, Mart 2010, ss.145-159; http://www.tid.gov.tr/Makaleler/466fnevalgenc.pdf; 07.09.2011.

Goodnow, F. J. (1900). Politics and Administration: A Study in Government, The Macmillan Company, NewYork; http://www.archive.org/download/ politicsadminist00goodrich/politicsadminist00goodrich.pdf 03.09.2011.

Güler, B. A. (2005). Kamu Yönetimi Yaklaşımları Nasıl Sınıflandırılabilir?; Yaklaşımları Sınıflandırmak, Çalışma notu, 1 Kasım 2005; http://80.251.40.59/ politics.ankara.edu.tr/bguler/pdf/kysiniflan.pdf; 07.09.2011.

Karasu, K. (2004). Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininin Kökenine İlişkin Bir Not, II.Kamu Yönetimi Forumu, Ankara; http://kamyon.politics.ankara.edu.tr /bulten/belgeler/04.pdf; 14.07.2011.

Keskin, N. E. (2006). “Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininin Köken Sorunu”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt 39, Sayı 2, Haziran 2006, s. 1-28.

Kettl, D. F. (2011). “The Future of Public Administration”, Humanities & Social Sciences Online; www.hnet.org/~pubadmin/tfreport/kettl.pdf; 03.09.2011.

Leblebici, D. N. (2001). “Disiplin ve Uygulama Açısından Kamu Yönetiminin “Kimlik Krizine” Yeni Bir Bakış, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Mayıs 2001, C.25, No.1, ss. 15-24.

Martin, D. W. (1987). “Deja Vu: French Antecedents of American Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, V. 47, No. 4, July - August 1987‘den aktaran

Martin, D. W. (1988). “The Fading Legacy of Woodrow Wilson”, Public Administration Review, V. 48, No. 2, March – April 1988, pp. 631-636.

Özer, M. A. (2006). “Kamu Yönetiminde Kimlik Bunalımı Üzerine Değerlendirmeler”, Sayıştay Dergisi, Sayı: 61, Nisan-Haziran 2006.

Parlak, B. and Sobacı, Z. (2005). Kuram ve Uygulamalarda Kamu Yönetimi: Ulusal ve Global Perspektif, Alfa Akademi Yayınları, İstanbul.

Pestritto, R. J. (2005). Woodrow Wilson and the roots of modern liberalism, (Rowman & Littlefield Publisher Inc.).

Raadschelders, J. C. N. (1999). “A Coherent Framework for the Study of Public Administration”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 9, pp.281-303.

Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2008). “Understanding Government: Four Intellectual Traditions in The Study of Public Administration”, Public Administration V. 86, No. 4, 2008, pp.925–949.

Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2011). “The Future of the Study of Public Administration: Embedding Research Object and Methodology in Epistemology and Ontology”, Public Administration Review, November - December 2011, pp.916-924.

Rutgers, M. R. (1995). “Seven Sins in Thinking about the Study of Public Administration”, Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 17, No. 1 pp. 67-85.

Rosser, C. (2011). Johann Caspar Bluntschl’s Organic Theory of State and Public Administration; http://www.irspm2010.com/workshops/papers/16_ johanncaspar.pdf; 10.08.2011.

Rutgers, M, R. (2000). “Public Administration and the Separation of Powers in a Cross-Atlantic Perspective”, Administrative Theory & Praxis, V.22, No. 2, (June, 2000)‘den aktaran Karasu, Koray, (2004), Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininin Kökenine İlişkin Bir Not, II.Kamu Yönetimi Forumu, Ankara; http://kamyon.politics.ankara.edu.tr/bulten/belgeler/04.pdf; 14.07.2011.

Rutgers, M. R. (2010). “Theory and Scope of Public Administration: An Introduction to the Study’s Epistemology”, Public Administration Review, Foundations of Public Administration Series; http://www.aspanet.org/ scriptcontent/pdfs/FPA-Theory-Article.pdf; 11.08.2011.

Samier, E. (2005). “Toward Public Administration as a Humanities Discipline: A Humanistic Manifesto”, Halduskultuur, 2005, V. 6, pp.6-59.

Small, A. W. (2001). The Cameralists: The Pioneeers of German Social Polity, (Batoche Books, Kitchener – Ontario)

Şaylan, G. (1996). “Bağımsız Bir Disiplin Olarak Kamu Yönetimi: Yeni Paradigma Arayışları”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, C. 29, S.3, Eylül 1996, ss.3-16.

Şaylan, G. (2000). “Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininde Bunalım ve Yeni Açılımlar Üzerine Düşünceler”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, C. 33, S.2, Haziran 2000, ss.1-22.

Şener, H. E. (2007). “Kamu Yönetiminde Postmodernizm”, Kamu Yönetimi: Yöntem ve Sorunlar, (Ed. Şinasi Aksoy,Yılmaz Üstüner), Nobel, Ankara, ss.31-47.

Thıes, C. F. and Pecquet, G. M. (2010). “The Shaping of a Future President’s Economic Thought: Richard T. Ely and Woodrow Wilson at ‘The Hopkins’”; Independent Review, September 2010, V. 15, No.2, pp.257- 277: http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_15_02_06_thies.pdf; 11.08.2011.

Ulusoy, G. (2007). “Disiplinlerarası Araştırma ve Eğitim”, Değişim Cağında Yüksek Öğretim: Global Trendler – Paradigmal Yönelimler, Coşkun Can Aktan (Ed.), İzmir: Yasar Üniversitesi, Mart 2007, ss. 389-398.

Van Der Eyden, T. (2003). Public Management of Society: Rediscovering French Institutional Engineering in The European Context, (IOS Press).

Vıgoda, E. (2003). ”Rethinking the Identity of Public Administration: Interdisciplinary Reflections and Thoughts on Managerial Reconstruction”, Public Administration & Management: An Interactive Journal, 8, 1, 2003, pp. 1-22; http://www.spaef.com/file.php?id=261; (02.04.2012).

Whıte, L. D. (1945). “The Just Official”, Public Administration Review, Book Review (Bonnin, Principios de Administración Pública ); http://www.cjbonnin.org/REFERENCIAS/whitebonnin.pdf; 11.08.2011.

Wilson, W. (1887). “The Study of Administration”, Political Science Quarterly, V.II, No.2, June 1887.

Wılson, W. (1961). “İdarenin İncelenmesi”, Woodrow Wilson Seçme Parçalar, (Çev. N. Abadan), Türk Siyasi İlimler Derneği Yayını, İstanbul.

Wrıght, Bradley E. (2011). “Public Administration as an Interdisciplinary Field: Assessing its Relationship with the Fields of Law, Management, and Political Science”, Public Administration Review, January - February 2011, pp. 96-101.