AİLE VE SOSYAL POLİTİKALAR BAKANLIĞI SOSYAL VE EKONOMİK DESTEK HİZMETLERİNİN ANALİZİ

AN ANALYSIS OF THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE MINISTRY OF FAMILY AND SOCIAL POLICIES IN TURKEY

One of the social policy implementations in Turkey affected by the globalization process and neo-liberal politics is Social and Economic Support (SED) services. It is provided by the GeneralDirectorate of Child Services of the Ministry of Family and Social Policy. SED services are providedfor children who do not need institutional care as long as they are supported. SED services aredirectly linked to the poverty-based child protection services. The main objective of this study isto address the SED services, one of the social policy implementations for the prevention of childpoverty, to present the current situation and deficiencies. In this study, data related to SEDservices will be discussed in terms of neo-liberal policies. In addition; the number of aid recipientswithin years and their share in GDP will be discussed. In conclusion, in addition to significantpositive contributions, SED services appear to have significant shortcomings. In particular, thenon-systematic and non-comprehensive implementations of follow-up and monitoring processes,lack of social and psychological support services are outstanding problems. These aspects are ofgreat importance in terms of providing relief from the welfare dependency of the service.Moreover, with the influence of neo-liberalism, social welfare responsibilities of the state aretransferred to other institutions (traditional charitable organizations, NGOs, voluntaryorganizations, etc.) to a certain extent. In addition, it is believed that the current practicecentralizes the family while not considering the women’s burden of care.

___

  • Abacı, B. (2012). The effects of neoliberal politics on development in the process of globalization: Case of Turkey. (Master Thesis) Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
  • ASPB. (2017). 2016 annual report. Ankara.
  • Bauman, Z. (2016). Globalization: The Human Consequences (A. Yılmaz, Trans. Vol. 6). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Publishing.
  • Buğra, A. (2001). Ekonomik kriz karşısında Türkiye’nin geleneksel refah rejimi. Society and Science, 89, 22-30.
  • Chomsky, N. (2014). Profit over People: Neoliberalism and Global Order (S. Evren, Trans.). İstanbul: Everest Publishing.
  • Çelik, A. (2010). New Conservative Social Policy Tendency on Turkey: Aid and Philanthropy Rather Than Social Right and Public Responsibility. İ. Journal of Political Sciences of Istanbul University, 42, 63-81.
  • ÇHGM. (2017). 2017 bulletin. Ankara.
  • Erdoğan, M. (2014). Assessment of Social and Economic Support Services Project: Research Result Report. Ankara: Ministry of Family and Social Policy General Directorate Child Services.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. New York: Polity Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (2015). Toplumsal riskler ve refah devletleri (B. Yakut-Çakar & U. B. Balaban, Trans.). In A. Buğra & Ç. Keyder (Eds.), Sosyal Politika Yazıları (7. Baskı :33-52). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • EUROSTAT. (2016). EU Children at Risk of Poverty and Social Exclusion Statistic. European Statistic Institute.
  • EUROSTAT. (2018). Population Structure Statistic. European Statistic Institute.
  • Günal :(2010). Avrupa Birliğinin Güney Avrupa sosyal devletine etkisi: İspanya Örneği. Journal of Assistance and Solidarity, 1(1), 81-96.
  • Kleinman, M. (2015). Kriz mi? Ne krizi? Avrupa refah devletlerinde süreklilik ve değişim (B. Yakut-Çakar & U. B. Balaban, Trans.). In A. Buğra & Ç. Keyder (Eds.), Sosyal politika yazıları (7. Baskı :159-194). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Koçal, A. V. (2014). Bir Sosyal Politika ve Siyasal Meşrutiyet Aracı Olarak 'Hayırseverlik' Türkiye’de Sivil Yardım Organizasyonlarının Politik Ekonomisi ve Siyasal İşlevi Sosyal insan Hakları Ulusal Sempozyomu VI Bildirileri Kitabı (Vol. 119 :211-225). İstanbul: Petrol İş Yayını.
  • Kuştepeli, Y., & Halaç, U. (2004). Analysis and improvement of the overall income distribution in Turkey. Dokuz Eylul University The Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 6(4), 143-160.
  • OECD. (2016). OECD Income Distribution Database (IDD): Gini, poverty, income, Methods and Concepts.
  • Okur, A., Soylu, N., & Aslan, E. (2016). Sosyal ve Ekonomik Destek Hizmetleri (SED): İdarecilere ve Meslek Elemanlarına Yönelik El Kitabı. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı Çocuk Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
  • Önür, H. T. (2009). Türkiye’de muhafazakar liberal söylemin yoksullukla mücadele açmazı: ne muhafazakar ne liberal’. In the International Symposium of Social Right Proceeding Book, 352-360.
  • Özdemir: (2005). Sosyal gelişim düzeyleri farklı devletlerin sınıflandırması üzerine bir inceleme. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları, Publication of İstanbul University Faculty of Economics. İstanbul.
  • Özdemir: (2007). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Refah Devleti (2. Baskı ed.). İstanbul: İstanbul Ticaret Odası Publishing.
  • Şahin, F. (2000). Sosyal hizmet uzmanlarının sosyal refah politikası süreçlerine katılımı. Ankara: Aydınlar Matbaası.
  • Şaşman Kaylı, D. (2016). Feminist politika çerçevesinde sosyal politika ve sosyal hizmete bir bakış. In D. Şaşman Kaylı & F. Şahin (Eds.), Sosyal politikanın cinsiyet halleri: Toplumsal cinsiyet ve sosyal hizmet. (p. 27- 57). Ankara: Nika Publishing.
  • Şeker, D. and Uçan, G. (2016). Göç sürecinde kadın. CBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1), 199-214
  • Şimşek, Z., Erol, N., Öztop, D. & Özer Özcan, Ö. (2008). Epidemiology of Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Children and Adolescents Reared in Orphanages: A National Comparative Study. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry 19(3), 235-246.
  • Titmuss, R. M. (1965). Role of Redistribution in Social Policy. Social Security, 28(14), 94-106.
  • Tiyek, R. & Yertüm, U. (2016). Güney Avrupa refah rejimi bağlamında Türkiye: bir değerlendirme. Kırklareli University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, 5(1), 26-51.
  • TURKSTAT. (2014). Child Statistic. Turkish Statistical Institute.
  • TURKSTAT. (2016). Child Statistic. Turkish Statistical Institute.
  • TURKSTAT. (2017). Income and Living Conditions Survey. Turkish Statistical Institute.
  • TURKSTAT. (2018). Child Statistic. Turkish Statistical Institute.
  • TURKSTAT. (2018). Income and Living Conditions Survey. Turkish Statistical Institute.
  • TURKSTAT. (2018). Population Statistic. Turkish Statistical Institute.
  • UNICEF. (2012). Measuring Child Poverty New League Tables of Child Poverty in the World’s Rich Countries. UNICEF. (2014). Child Poverty in the Post-2015 Agenda UNICEF Issue Brief.
  • Vorria, P., Papaligoura, Z., Sarafidou, J., Kopakaki, M., Dunn, J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H. & Kontopoulou, A. (2006). The development of adopted children after institutional care: a follow-up study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(12), 1246-1253.
  • Yazıcı, E. (2012). Chıldren in Need of Protection and Children's Homes. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of the Graduate School of social Sciences, 9(18), 499-525.