Is Post-Modernisma a Tramp for the Developmet?

Günümüzde dünyanın ikiye bölündüğü yaygın kabul görmektedir; gelişmiş ve gelişmemiş, ülkeler. Gelişmemiş ülkeler sadece bir seçenekle karşı karşıyadırlar artık; gelişmek ya da modernleşmek. Bu dönemde, Batı uygarlığı bazı temel değerlere/kavramlara işaret etmektedir; kapitalizm, bireyselcilik, laiklik, insan hakları, tüketim ve bunlardan önemlisi, rasyonalite. Fakat, Batıdaki aydınlar, Batının, rasyonalite ve özellikle pozitif metodolojinin ilkelerine dayanarak kazandığı, göreli imtiyazları ve üstünlükleri korumak ve sağlamlaştırmak için bu tartışmaların yönünü değiştirmenin zamanı geldiğine inanmaktadırlar. Bu makale, post-modern söylemi, azgelişmiş ülkeler açısından değerlendirmektedir. Sonuç olarak, post-modernizmin, azgelişmiş ülkelerin maddi kaynaklarını ve emek piyasasını sömürmeye hizmet ettiği kabul edilecektir.

Post-Modernizm Gelişmek İçin Bir Adım mıdır?

It is widely accepted that, in our day, the world is divided into two different parts; developed and undeveloped. Undeveloped countries were left simply with one choice; that is, development or modernisation. In this period, Western civilisation points to a number of basic values/concept, namely, capitalism, individualism, secularism, human rights, consumption, and more importantly than the others, rationality. However, intellectuals in the West is apparently convinced that it is just time to shift the direction of these discussions and to maintain and consolidate relative vested privileges and superiority of the West, which were gained on the basis of principles of rationality and particularly the positivist methodology. This article reviews the post-modern discourse from the perspective of undeveloped countries. It is concluded that post-modernisation services for the exploitation of the labour market and material resources of undeveloped world.

PDF

___

BAGNALL, Richard G. 1998), “Moral Education in a Postmodern World: Continuing professional education”, Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p. 313-32.
BAUDRILLARD, Jean. (1975), The Mirror of Production, St. Louise.
BELL, D. (1973), The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, Basic, London.
BELL, D. (1976), Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, New York.
BOLOGH, Roslyn Wallach; MELL, Leonard. (1994) “Modernism, Postmodernism, and The New World (Dis)order: A Dialectical Analysis and Alternative”, Critical Sociology, 1994, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p81, 40p.
BURGIN, Victor. (1986), The End of Art Theory: Criticism and Post-modernity, London.
CALLINICOS, Alex. (1990), Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique, New York.
CROOK, S., J. PAKULSKI, M. WATERS. (1992), Postmodernisation, Sage, London.
DAHRENDORF, Ralf. (1959), Class and Class Conflict In Industrial Society, Stanfodr University Press.
DERRIDA, Jacque. (1987), The Truth in Painthing, London.
DIRLIK, Arif, (1999). “Formations of Globality and Radical Politics”, The Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies, Vol: 21. No: 4, pp. 301-338
DIRLIK, Arif. (2002), “Modernity as History: post-revolutionary China, Globalisation and the Question of Modernity”, Social History, Vol: 27, No:1.
EHRENREICH, B. and J. EHRENREICH. (1977), The Professional Manegiral Class, Radical America, 11(2), p.7-31.
ETZIONI, Amatai. (1968), Active Society, Free Press, London.
FEATHERSTONE, M., (1988), "In pursuit of the Postmodern": An Introduction", Theory,, Culture and Society, Special Issue On Postmodenism, ed. M.Featherstone, Vol.5, nos, 2-3. p.195-215.
FEKETE, John. (1988), (ed.), Life after Post-modernism, London.
FEYERABEND, Paul. K. (1975), Against Method, London.
FOUCAULT, Michel. (1984). "What is Enlightenment?" in Paul Rabinow, (ed)., The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books.
GIDDENS, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society, Oxford.
HABERMAS, Jurgen. (1985), "A Philosophico-Political Profile", New Left Review, 151, p.75-105.
HABERMAS, Jurgen. (1987), A Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Oxford and Cambridge.
HABERMAS, Jurgen. (1989) "Modernity: An Incomplete Project," in Hal Foster, (ed)., Postmodern Culture, London: Pluto Press.
HARVEY, D. (1989), The Condition of Post-modern, Blackwell, Oxford.
HASSAN, Ihab. (1980), "The Question of Post-modernizm", in, Harry R. Garvin (ed.), Romanticism, Modernism, Post-modernism, Bucknell Review, London, p.117-26.
JAMESON, Frederic. (1984), "Post-modernism and the Cultural Logic of Capitalism", New Left Review, 146: 53-93.
KAPOOR, Iian, (2002), “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? The Relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe for Third World Politics”, Alternatives, 27, 459-487.
KELLNER, D. (1990), "The Post-modern Turn; Positions, Problems, and Prospects, iç, G.Ritzer (ed.), Frontiers of Social Theoy: The New Styntheses, Colombia University Press, New York, 255-286.
LASH, S. and J. URRY. (1987), The End of Organized Capitalism, Polity, Cambridge.
LEMERT, Charles.(2000), “Commentary On Allan And Turner. Sailing In Postmodern Winds: Formal Methods In Uncertain Worlds”, Sociological Perspectives, Fall2000, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p. 387, 12p
LYOTARD, Jean-François. (1984), The Post-Modern Condition, University of Minneapolis Press.
MCKINLAY, Patrick F.(1998), “Postmodernism and democracy: Learning from Lyotard and Lefort”, Journal of Politics, May, Vol. 60 Issue 2, p. 481, 22p
NİC J., Fox. (1998), “Foucault, Foucauldians and Sociology”, British Journal of Sociology, Vol: 49, No: 3, 415-434.
QUICKE, John. (1999), “The Postmodern Turn: problems and possibilities”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol.20, No: 2.
ROBERTS, Michael. (2000) “Rethinking the Post-modern Perspectives: Excavating the Kantian System to Rebuild Social Theory”, The Sociological Quarterly, Vol: 41, 681-698.
ROSE, M. (1991), The Post-Modern and the Post-Industrial, Cambridge University Press.
SYLVESTER, Christine. (1999), “Development studies and postcolonial studies: disparate tales of the ‘Third World’”, Third World Quarterly, Vol: 20, No. 4, pp. 703-721.
TATE, John W. (1999). “Posting Modernity to the Past?”, Telos, Issue 115, p. 79-95.
WATERS, Malcom. (1994), Modern Sociological Theory, Sage, London.
WEBER, Max. (1968), Economy and Society, New York, Bedminster Press.
WEBER, Max. (1989), Selections in Transition, W.G.Runciman (ed)., Cambridge University Press.
WILLIAMS, Alastair (2001), “Adorno and the Semantics of Modernism”, Perspectives of New Music, Summer1999, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p. 29, 22p.
WOODE, M., (1986), The Retreat from Class: The New "True", Socialism, London, Verso.