Hedonizm, Hedonik Tüketim Ve Tüketimde Materyalist Eğilimler Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Modern pazarlama yaklaşımı, tüketicilerin farklı özelliklerini de göz önüne alarak, talepler ve ihtiyaçlar üzerine odaklanmaktadır. Tüketicileri alışverişe yönlendiren nedenlerin tespiti ve bunun yanı sıra hangi pazarlama çabalarının tüketiciler üzerinde daha etkili olduğunun ortaya çıkartılması tüketici literatürü kapsamında üzerinde durulan konulardandır. Hedonizm, genel olarak hayatın her alanında kişinin haz odaklı hareket etmesi anlamını taşımaktadır. Hedonik tüketimin günümüze kadar nasıl şekillenerek geldiğini algılayabilmek için haz kavramın da anlaşılması gerekir. Tüketim olgusunun tek bir değerlendirme boyutuyla ele alınarak tüketici davranışlarının analiz edilmesi ilgili araştırma konusunun, bilimsel bakış açısını sınırlandırıcı bir rol üstlenebilir. Çok yönlü olan insan öğesinin hem materyalist hem de hazcı bir şekilde ele alınarak irdelenmesi tüketici davranışlarına yönelik tespitlerin daha sağlıklı bir şekilde yapılmasını sağlayacaktır. Bu durum aynı zamanda işletmelerin ve pazarlama yöneticilerin pazarlama çabalarını geliştirirken de daha verimli ve etkili stratejiler ortaya koymalarına vesile olacaktır. Çalışmada toplam 318 katılımcıdan elde edilen verilen çeşitli istatistikî analiz yöntemleriyle incelenmiş ve hedonik tüketim ile materyalist eğilimler arasındaki ilişki ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırmada kullanılan ölçeklerin yeterli güvenilirlik seviyesine sahip olduğu yapılan analizler sonucunda tespit edilmiştir.

A Research On Hedonism, Hedonic Consumption And Materialist Trends in Consumption

The modern marketing approach focuses on demands and needs of consumers while taking into account the different characteristics of them. Determining the reasons that lead consumers to shopping, as well as determining which marketing efforts are more effective on consumers, are among the topics covered by the consumer literature. Hedonism generally means that in every aspect of life a person acts in a sense of pleasure. In order to understand how hedonic consumption has been shaped up to today, it is necessary to understand the concept of pleasure. The analysis of consumer behavior can play a limiting role in the scientific point of view of the relevant research topic by considering the consumption phenomenon in a single evaluation dimension. The analysis of the multi-faceted human element in both materialist and nutritious ways will help to make the determinations for consumer behavior healthier. This will also lead businesses and marketing managers to develop more efficient and effective strategies while improving their marketing efforts. The data obtained from 318 participants were examined by various statistical analysis methods and the relationship between hedonic consumption and materialism trends was determined. It was found that the scales used in the study had a sufficient level of reliability.

___

  • Aaker, D.A., Kumar,V. & Day, G.S., (2007), Marketing Research, 9. Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Danvers.
  • Adaval, R. (2001), “Sometimes It Just Feels Right: The Differential Weighting of Affect‐ Consistent and Affect‐Inconsistent Product Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol:28, No:1, 1-17.
  • Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003), “Hedonic Shopping Motivations”, Journal of Retailing, No:79, 77-95.
  • Arslan, B., Gültekin, N. & Karapınar, I. (2017), “Examination of Materialist Tendencies of Syrian Origin University Students in Terms of Demographic Features”, Art, Economics and Politics In Modern Turkey, AGP Academic Research, 208-216.
  • Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994), “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value”, Journal of Consumer Research, No:20, 644-657.
  • Baş, M. & Samsunlu, G. (2015), “Starbucks Coffee Tüketicilerinin Demografik Özelliklerinden Biri Olan Cinsiyete Göre Hedonik Tüketim Nedenlerinden Etkilenme Tutumlarının Belirlenmesi”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:17, No:1, 14-34.
  • Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1990),” Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitude”, Marketing Letters, Vol:2, No:2, 159-170.
  • Belk, R.W. (1985), “Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in a Material World”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol:6, No:12, 265-280.
  • Botti, S., & McGill, A. L. (2011), “The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol:37, No:6, 1065- 1078.
  • Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (2000), Scaling Back Goals and Recalibration of the Affect System are Processes in Normal Adaptive Self-Regulation: Understanding ‘Response Shift’ phenomena. Social Science & Medicine, Vol :50, No:12 ,1715-1722.
  • Chen, C. C., & Schwartz, Z. (2010),” The Impact of Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations on the Hotel Customers’ Risk Perception. Emerging Issues and Trends in Hospitality and Tourism Research”, Ceasers Harrah Hospitality Research Summit. Las Vegas, NV: June, Paper 5, 9-11.
  • Chen, Y. C., Shang, R. A., Shu, C. Y., & Lin, C. K. (2015), “The Effects of Risk and Hedonic Value on the Intention to Purchase on Group Buying Website: The Role of Trust, Price and Conformity Intention”, Universal Journal of Management, Cilt:3, No: 6, 246-256.
  • Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2007), “Form Versus Function: How the Intensities of Specific Emotions Evoked in Functional Versus Hedonic Trade-Offs Mediate Product Preferences”, Journal of Marketing Research, Cilt:44, Sayı:4, 702-714.
  • Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2008), “Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits”, Journal of Marketing, Cilt:72, No:3, 48-63.
  • Cleveland, M., Laroche, M. & Papadopoulos, N. (2009), “Cosmopolitanism, Consumer Ethnocentrism and Materialism: An Eight Country Study of Antecedents and Outcomes”, Journal of International Marketing, Cilt:17, Sayı:1, 116-146.
  • Crowley, A. E., Spangenberg, R. E., & Hughes, R. K. (1992), “Measuring the Hedonic and Dimensions of Attitudes Toward Product Categories”, Marketing Letters, Cilt:3, Sayı:3,239-249.
  • Çal, B., & Adams, R. (2014), “The Effect of Hedonistic and Utilitarian Consumer Behavior on Brand Equity: Turkey-UK Comparison on Coca Cola”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Cilt:150, 475-484.
  • Davis, D.W., Dowley, K.M. & Silver, B.D. (1999), “Postmaterialism in World Societies: Is It Really a Value Dimension?”, American Journal of Political Science, Cilt :43 No:3, 935- 962.
  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985), “Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior”, Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000), “Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods”, Journal of Marketing Research, Cilt:37, No:1, 60-71.
  • Ger, G. & Belk, R.W. (1996), “Cross-cultural Differences in Materialism”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Cilt:17, No:2, 55-77.
  • Hanzaee, K. H., & Khonsari, Y. (2011), “A Review of the Role of Hedonic and Utilitarian Values on Customer’s Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions (A Case Study; Customers of Fasham Restaurants)”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, No: 5, 34-45.
  • Hartman, Jonathan B., Shim Soyeon, Barber, Bonnie & O’Brien, Matthew (2006), “Adolescents’ Utilitarian and Hedonic Web-Consumption Behavior: Hierarchical Influence of Personal Values and Innovativeness”, Journal of Psychology & Marketing, Cilt: 23, Sayı:10, 813- 839.
  • Hirschman, C. E., & Holbrook, B. M. (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions”, Journal of Marketing, Cilt: 46, Sayı:3, 92-101.
  • Inglehart, R. (1990), “Cultural Shift in Advanced Industrial Society”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Karasar, N. (2008), Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. 18. Baskı, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kivetz, R. (2000), “Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations in Consumer Choice”, Advances in Consumer Research, No:27, 286-286.
  • Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002), “Self-Control for the Righteous: Toward a Theory of Precommitment to Indulgence”, Journal of Consumer Research, Cilt:29, Sayı:2 199-217.
  • Lim, E., & Ang, S. (2008), “Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Consumption: A Cross-Cultural Perspective Based on Cultural Conditioning”, Journal of Business Research, Cilt:61, Sayı:3, 225-232.
  • Mano, H., & Oliver, R. (1993), “Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction”, Journal of Consumer Research, Cilt:20, Sayı:3, 451-466.
  • McGuire, W. (1974),” Psychological Motives and Communication Gratification. In J. F. Blumer & Katz (Eds.), The Uses of Mass Communication: Current Perspectives on Gratification Research”, Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Newbold, P. (2005), İşletme ve İktisat İçin İstatistik, 4. Baskı, Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Odabaşı, Y. & Barış, G. (2015), “Tüketici Davranışları” 15. Baskı, İstanbul: Mediacat- Kapital Medya Hizmetleri A.Ş.
  • Okada, E. M. (2005), “Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods”, Journal of Marketing Research, Sayı:42, 43-53.
  • Özdemir, Ş. & Yaman, F. (2007). “Hedonik Alışverişin Cinsiyete Göre Farklılaşması Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:2, Sayı:2, 81-91.
  • Özgül, E. (2011). “Tükeicilerin Sosyo-Demografik Özelliklerinin Hedonik Tüketim ve Gönüllü Sade Yaşam Tarzları Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”, Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt:11, Sayı:1, 25-28.
  • Park, H. & Rabolt, N.J. (2009), “Cultural Value, Consumption Value, and Global Brand Image: A Cross-National Study”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol:26, No:8, 714-735.
  • Richins, M.L. & Dawson, S. (1992), “A Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation”, Journal of Consumer Research, Cilt:19, No:3, 303-316.
  • Richins, M.L. (2004), “The Material Values Scale: Measurement Properties and Development of a Short Form”, Journal of Consumer Research, Cilt:31, No:1, 209-219.
  • Roberts, J.A. (2000), “Consuming in Consumer Culture: College Students, Materialism, Status Consumption and Compulsive Buying”, The Marketing Management Journal, Cilt:10, Sayı:2, 76-91.
  • Roy, R., & Ng, S. (2012), “Regulatory Focus and Preference Reversal Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Consumption”, Journal of Consumer Behavior, Cilt:11, Sayı:1, 81-88.
  • Ruth, J. & Commuri, S.R. (1998), “Shifting Roles in Family Decision Making”, Advances in Consumer Research, Cilt:25, Sayı:4, 400-406.
  • Ryu, K., Han, H., & Jang, S. (2010), “Relationships Among Hedonic and Utilitarian Values, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions in The Fast-Casual Restaurant Industry”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Cilt:22, Sayı:3, 416- 432.
  • Sela, Aner, Berger, Jonah, & Liu, Wendy (2009), “Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size Influences Option Choice”, The Journal of Consumer Research, Cilt:35, No:6, 941– 951.
  • Shafir, Eldar, Simonson, Itamar, & Tversky, Amos (1993), “Reason-Based Choice”, Cognition, Cilt:49, Sayı:1–2, 11–36.
  • Solomon, M. (2010), “Consumer Behavior”, Harlow, England: Prentice Hall/Financial Times.
  • Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell”, Journal of Consumer Research, Cilt: 24, No: 4, 434.
  • Sweeney, J., & Soutar, G. (2001), “Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale”, Journal of Retailing, Cilt:77, No:2, 203-220.
  • Tilley, John J., (2012), “Hedonism, Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics”, 2nd edition., Editor: Ruth Chadwick, San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Tversky, A., & Griffin, D. (1991), “Endowment and Contrast in Judgments of Well-Being”, Elmsford, NY, US: Pergamon Press.
  • Ünal, Sevtap & Ceylan, Cem, (2008), “Tüketicileri Hedonik Alışverişe Yönelten Nedenler: İstanbul ve Erzurum İllerinde Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 22, Sayı: 2, 265-284.
  • Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're Psychological Review, 94(1), 3-15.
  • Veblen, Torstein (2005), “Aylak Sınıfın Teorisi”, Çev.: Zeynep Gültekin ve Cumhur Atay, Babil Yayınları, No:48, İstanbul.
  • Voigt, C., Brown, G., & Howat, G. (2011), “Wellness Tourists: in Search of Transformation”, Tourism Review, Cilt:66, No:1/2, 16-30.
  • Voss, K., Spangenberg, E., & Grohmann, B. (2003), “Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude”. Journal of Marketing Research, Cilt :40, No: 3, 310- 320.
  • Wang, J. & Wallendorf, M. (2006), “Materialism, Status Signaling, and Product Satisfaction”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Cilt:34, No: 4, 494-505.
  • Watson, John J. (2003), “The Relationship of Materialism to Spending Tendencies, Saving, and Debt”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Cilt:24, No: 6, 723-739.
  • Workman, J.E. & Seung, H.L. (2011), “Materialism, Fashion Consumers and Gender: A CrossCultural Study”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Cilt:35, Sayı:1, 50-57.
  • Xiao, G. & Kim, J. (2009), “The Investigation of Chinese Consumer Values, Consumption Values, Life Satisfaction, and Consumption Behaviors”, Psychology & Marketing, Cilt:26, Sayı: 7, 610-624.
  • Yanıklar, C. (2006), “Tüketimin Sosyolojisi”, İstanbul: Birey Yayıncılık.
  • Yener D., Oskaybaş K. & Dursun T. (2014), “Hedonism, Materialism and Consumer Boycotts Participation”, İİB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 15, 99-111.
Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-1237
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1941
  • Yayıncı: Türk Kooperatifçilik Kurumu