THE EFFECT OF PERCEIVED SERVICE EFFICIENCY, PRODUCTIVITY, PARTICIPATION AND ECONOMIC-PHYSICAL SUFFICIENCY ON THE ATTITUDES AGAINST MUNICIPAL AMALGAMATION

2012 yılında yayımlanan 6360 sayılı Kanun kapsamında Türkiye'deki belde belediyelerinin birçoğunu ilgilendiren önemli bir yerel yönetim reformu gerçekleştirilmiştir. Belde belediyelerinin tüzel kişilikleri kaldırılarak ölçek ekonomisi gerekçesiyle ilçe belediyelerine mahalle olarak bağlanmıştır. Etkinlik ve verimlilik, katılım ile mali ve fiziki yeterlilik konuları, Kanun'da belde belediyelerinin kapatılmasını destekleyici bir unsur olarak ele alınan ölçek ekonomisinin alt başlıklarını oluşturmaktadır. Bu çerçevede araştırmanın amacı; Gümüşlük halkının belde belediyesini, 6360 sayılı Kanun'un gerekçesinde kapatılma için birer neden olarak yer verilen, etkin-verimli hizmet, katılım ile mali-fiziki yeterlilik unsurları açısından nasıl algıladığını ve bu unsurların belediyenin kapatılmaması konusundaki tutumlarını ne yönde etkilediğini ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmada kullanılan veri toplama yöntemi ise, ankettir ve evrenden rastgele örneklem yöntemine göre seçilen 409 kişiye uygulanmıştır. Ankete katılanların belediyenin kapatılmamasına yönelik bir tutum sergilediği tespitinde bulunulmuştur. Etkin-verimli hizmet, katılım ve mali-fiziki yeterlilik algısı artarsa belediyenin kapatılmaması yönündeki tutumların da arttığı saptanmıştır. Araştırmanın hipotezini test etmek için çoklu regresyon analizi yapılmış, etkin-verimli hizmet, katılım ve mali-fiziki yeterlilik algısının belediyenin kapatılmamasına yönelik tutum üzerindeki etkisini açıklamaya çalışan model bir bütün olarak anlamlı çıkmış ve hipotez kabul edilmiştir. Çalışma, idari dönüşüm öncesi durumu bir belde özelinde incelediği için, yapılacak alan araştırmaları ile dönüşüm sonrası hedeflere değerlendirilmesine kaynaklık edebilecektir. Bu kapsamda elde edilen bulguların hem kamu yöneticileri hem de akademisyenler için yol gösterici olacağı söylenebilir

ETKİN VE VERİMLİ HİZMET, KATILIM İLE MALI VE FİZİKİYETERLİLİK ALGISININ BELEDİYE TÜZEL KİŞİLİĞİNİNKALDIRILMASINA İLİŞKİN TUTUM ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİBELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

The local government reforms of the last decade in Turkey resulted in continuous growth, expansion, and rescaling of larger municipalities in favor of larger administrative units. With the latest Act No 63601, announced in 2012, there happened to be an important reform regarding local administration which applies to most of the town municipalities in Turkey. 30 special provincial administrations, 1.591 smaller municipalities, and 16.082 villages were dissolved as a result of the expansion of the 30 metropolitan municipalities to provincial borders in 2014. The town municipalities’ current statue as legal entities abated and instead they centralized to district municipalities as neighborhoods showing the reason of economics of scale. The factors of efficiency, productivity, participation and, physical and financial sufficiency, are asserted in relation to the economics of scale while the reforms on the basis of local administration are at stake in Turkey. Furthermore, these factors are presented as the main reasons of administrative transitions in the law’s preambles. It is accepted that these factors are not sufficiently met by the small-sized municipalities so the legal entities of the town municipalities should be transferred as its neighborhoods to bigger municipalities. In other words, it is assumed that the community of the town municipality will be ruled by more participated *Bu makale Crosscheck sistemi tarafından taranmış ve bu sistem sonuçlarına göre orijinal bir makale olduğu tespit edilmiştir. ** Yrd.Doç.Dr., Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi/Yerel Yönetimler Bölümü, ruveyda.kizilboga@gmail.com *** Yrd.Doç.Dr., Nevşehir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi/Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü, husniyeakilli@nevsehir.edu.tr **** Doktora Öğrencisi, Marmara Üniversitesi Mahalli İdareler ve Yerinden Yönetim Bilim Dalı, kamil.ozaslan@hotmail.com 1 The Law Regarding the Foundation of Twenty Seven Districts and Fourteen New Metropolitan and The Law regarding Changes in Delegated Legislation (Official Gazatte, date: 06.12.2012, number: 28489). 612 Rüveyda KIZILBOĞA ÖZASLAN – Hüsniye AKILLI – Kamil ÖZASLAN Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 10/2 Winter 2015 management, so they will have a financially and physically more equipped municipality. The pathway of local government reforms in Turkey follows the international examples towards municipal amalgamation to benefit scale economies. Municipal amalgamation has been a common policy in local government reforms around the world (Reingewertz, 2012: 240; Calciolari, et al., 2013: 565). Academic debate has taken place for years regarding the best methods to organize municipalities (Spicer, 2012). The studies about the economic achievements of these reforms have produced mixed results. The discussion on optimal size of local government usually focuses on economic efficiency, democracy, distribution and development dimensions (Swianiewicz, 2002). However the complexity of municipal restructuring allows no easy answer as to whether amalgamation will lead to effectiveness and efficiency improvements in service delivery and financial situation or municipal governance (Vojnovic, 1998). According to Kjaer, et al. (2010) changes in municipal size are often considered as a balancing of two opposites, namely economy and democracy the larger the municipality, the greater the economies of scale, but the harder conditions for a well-functioning local democracy. It could be claimed that those who emphasize the existence of various administrative units in local governments hold a perspective which advocate local democracy, while those who support amalgamation of fragmented structures base their arguments in terms of efficiency and functional capacity. The consequences of municipality amalgamation/abolition is an unresolved issue. So it is important to track the route of recent administrative reform in Turkey with empirical research findings. Because this topic, which is frequently studied in terms of economics and democracy, is a multi-dimensional process which involve legal, political, administrative, socio-cultural, demographic, ecological and even daily life issues aside from purely technical problems. Thus, it is important to understand the public perception about this reform. Administrative transition towards the abolishment of the town municipalities is a difficult one because it will not be very well responded by the community and administrators. As the previous factors show, it is more difficult for the community to accept the transition if they have a perception that the current administration satisfies their needs. Hence, the research of Aktel et al. (2009) “the perception of communities who live in the small-sized municipalities in Isparta towards the decree about the municipalities’ abolishment” regarding the law no: 5747 asserts that “the reason put forward by the central administration is not interiorized by the local community and so they are against the abolishment.” Similarly, the aim of this study is looking at the community of Gümüşlük whose town municipality will be closed regarding the law no: 6360, in order to understand the reactions of the community towards the conditions of the subclauses (efficiency and productivity in addition to the participation and, physical and financial sufficiency) set forth by the authorities as a reason to close the municipalities. Hence, “efficient and productive ministration” and “physical and financial sufficiency” are determined as independent variables and these independent The Effect of Perceived Service Efficiency, Productivity, Participation, and… 613 Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 10/2 Winter 2015 variables are considered to be dependent variable of the research, “the negative attitude towards the abolishment of the town municipality.” In this context the following hypothesis is developed to inspect in this study: “The perception that Gümüşlük Municipality’s efficiency and productivity in addition to the participation and, physical and financial sufficiency affects positively the negative attitude towards the abolishment of the town municipality.” The research population is the residents of Gümüşlük. Our data gathering technique is a survey. The questionnaire is applied in November and December 2013 to 409 people who are picked randomly from the population according to the technique. In the research, we take advantage of Aktel et al.’s sample (2009) developed in “Showing residents’ perception about abolishment of local municipalities in Isparta” under the law no: 5747. Questions are mostly overhauled in accordance with the aim of the research. 12 statements and total 43 statements are prepared for the “participation”; variable 8, for the “effective and productive service”; 14, for the “economic and physical sufficiency”; 9, for the dependent variable “the attitude for the abolishment of Gümüşlük Municipality”. The scale that enables us to understand participants’ attitudes and perceptions is a five point Likert scale. The data acquired are analyzed through the medium of SPSS2. Correlation and regression analysis are done to test the hypothesis and to show the relation between research variables. It is established that there is a certain attitude towards keeping the current municipal system against centralization. It is confirmed that if the perception of efficient-productive service, physical and financial sufficiency increases, then the tendency towards not to lose the current system increases either. To test the hypothesis of the research, multiple regressions are analyzed and our model is determined to be meaningful and our hypothesis is verified. It was concluded that among the three perceptions, the perception of effective-productive service seems to be the dimension that explains the effect most. The data gathered showed similarities with the result of the study held by Aktel et al. (2009). Since this study examines the conditions of towns before their transition, it is possible that it will be sourceful to compare the transition’s success with fieldworks. For this study is examined the condition before the transition focusing on a town, it is possible that it is going to be sourceful to inspect comparatively the transition’s success with fieldworks. The data to be collected this way would be instructive for both academicians and the government executives.

___

  • AKTEL, M., Y. ALTAN and U. KERMAN. (2009). 5747 Sayılı Yasa ile Köye Dönüştürülen Küçük Belediyeler: Isparta Örneği [Small Municipalities that are Transformed into Villages by Law No. 5747: Isparta Case], Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, Ankara: TODAİE Yayını, 18.1, 45-70.
  • AKYEL, R. and H. O. KÖSE. (2010). Kamu Yönetiminde Etkinlik Arayışı: Etkin Kamu Yönetimi İçin Etkin Denetimin Gerekliliği [Quest for Effectiveness in Public Sector: Effective Audit for an Effective Public Management], Türk İdare Dergisi, Sayı. 466, 9-45.
  • ARIKBOĞA, E. (1998). Yerel Yönetimler, Katılım ve Mahalle Muhtarlığı, [Local Government Participation and Neigbourhood Al Muhtar (Headman).Masters Thesis], Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Mahalli İdareler ve Yerinden Yönetim Bilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  • ARSLAN, A. (2002). Kamu Harcamalarında Verimlilik, Etkinlik, Denetim-1 [Productivity, Efficiency, Audit in Public Expenditures], Maliye Dergisi, Sayı. 140, 1-14, http://www.sgb.gov.tr/Sayfalar/MaliyeDergisi.aspx
  • AYMAN GÜLER, B. (2012). Bütünşehir Belediyesi TBMM Konuşmaları [Municipality Parliament Commission Speeches], http://www.birgulaymanguler.net/files/BUTUNSEHiR.pdf (erişim tarihi: 03 Nisan 2014).
  • BHATTI, Y. and A. L. OLSEN. (2011). Keeping the Lights on: Citizen Service Centers in Municipal Amalgamations.Administration in Social Work, 35.1, 3-19. ISSN: 0364-3107.
  • BYRNES, J. and B. DOLLERY. (2002). Do Economies of Scale Exist in Australia Local Government.A Review of the Research Evidence 1.Urban Policy and Research. 20.4, 391- 414.
  • CALCIOLARI, S., D. CRISTOFOLI and L. MACCIO. (2013). Explaining the Reactions of Swiss Municipalities to The ‘Amalgamaiton Wave’: At the Crossroad of Institutional.Economic and Political Pressures. Public Management Review. 15.4, 563-583.
  • ÇINAR, T., C. U. ÇINER and O. ZENGIN. (2009). Büyükşehir Yönetimi Bütünleştirme Süreci [Process of Integrating Metropolitan Governance] Ankara: TODAİE Yayınları.
  • ÇOKER, Z. (1981). Kırsal Alanda Yerel Yönetim Sorunları ve Çözüm Yolları [Local Government Issues and Solutions in Rural Areas]. Türk İdare Dergisi, Sayı: 381, 69-99.
  • ÇOKER, Z. (1989). Yerel Yönetimler ve İller Bankası [Local Governments and Iller Bank], Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 22.1, 23-32.
  • DİCLE, A. (1975). Örgütsel Verimlilik ve Etkenlik [Organizational Productivity and Effectiveness], Ankara: ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Sayı: 9, 25-44.
  • DPT (State Planning Organization). (2001). Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı [Eighth Five Year Development Plan Local Governments Special Commission Report], Ankara: Yerel Yönetimler Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu.
  • DPT (State Planning Organization). (2007). Dokuzuncu Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı (2007-2013) [Ninth Five Year Development Plan Settlement and Urbanization Special Commission Report], Ankara: Yerleşme-Şehirleşme Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu.
  • DRECHSLER, W. (2013). Coercive Municipal Amalgamation Today-With Illustrations from Estonia.”Administrative Culture, 14.1, 158-165.
  • EKİNCİ, H. and A. YILMAZ. 2002. Kamu Örgütlerinde Yönetsel Etkinliğin Artırılması Üzerine Bir Araştırma [A Study on Managerial Effectiveness in Public Organization], Erciyes Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Sayı: 19, 35-50.
  • GÖZLER, K. (2013). 6360 Sayılı Kanun Hakkında Eleştiriler: Yirmi Dokuz İlde İl Özel İdareleri ve Köylerin Kaldırılması ve İlçe Belediyelerinin Büyükşehir İlce Belediyesi Haline Dönüştürülmesi Anayasamıza Uygun mudur?”[A Critique about the Law No. 6360 is It Constitutional to Abolish Special Provincial Administration and Villages in Twenty Nine Provinces and Converting District Municipalities into Metropolitan Sub-Provincial Municipalities?”], Legal Hukuk Dergisi, 11.122, 37-82.
  • GÜLÇUBUK, B. (2013). Büyükşehir Yasası Ne Getiriyor? Kırsala Ne Oluyor? [What Does Metropolitan Act Bring and What is Happening to the Rural Area?], Köy Koop Haber, Yıl: 2, Sayı: 16.
  • GÜRSOY, E. Z. (2008). Cumhuriyet Döneminde Yeni İl ve İlçe Kurulmasındaki Yaklaşımlar [Approaches about New Provinces and Districts Establishment in Republic Period], Türk İdare Dergisi, Sayı: 458, 81-94.
  • HANES, N. (2014). Amalgamation Impacts on Local Public Expenditures in Sweeden.Local Government Studies, Published Online 07 Feb. 2014, 1-15.
  • HANSEN, S. W. (2013). Polity Size and Local Political Trust: A Quasi-experiment Using Municipal Mergers in.Scandinavian Political Studies. 36.1, 43-66.
  • İZCİ, F. and M. TURAN. (2013). Türkiye’de Büyükşehir Belediye Sistemi ve 6360 Sayılı Yasa ile Büyükşehir Sisteminde Meydana Gelen Değişimler: Van Örneği [Metropolitan Municipality System in Turkey and Changes Taken Place in Metropolitan Municipality System with the Law No. 6360: Van Case], Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18.1, 117-152.
  • KARAÇOR, S. (2009). Yeni İletişim Teknolojileri, Siyasal Katılım, Demokrasi [New Communication Technologies, Political Participation, Democracy], Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İİBF Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 16.2, 121-131.
  • KAVRUK, H. (2008). 2004 ve Sonrası Yerel Yönetim Reform Girişimleri Açısından Köy ve Mahalle Yönetimleri [Management of Village and Neighborhood in Terms of Local Government Reform Initiatives 2004 and Beyond], Yurttaş R, Köseoğlu Ö. ve Gülener S. (der.) 1. Ulusal Yerel Yönetimler Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı içinde, Erkam Matbaa, Istanbul, 55-69.
  • KELEŞ, R. (2012), Yerinden Yönetim ve Siyaset [Local Governments and Politics], İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi.
  • KESER, A. and Y. GÖKMEN. (2012). Büyükşehir Belediyeleri Kuruluş Sürecinin Analizi [The Analysis of the Establishment Process of Metropolitan Municipalities], Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 21.1, 17-42.
  • KILINÇ, G. (2010). Çeyrek Asırlık Bir Tecrübe: Türkiye’de Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Yapılanması ve Kayseri Büyükşehir Belediyesi Örneği [A Quarter Century Experience: The Structuring of Metropolitan Municipalities in Turkey and the Case of Kayseri Metropolitan Municipality], Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 19.1, 67-89.
  • KIZILBOĞA, R. and O. V. ALICI. (2013). Türkiye’de Kırsal Alan Belediyeciliği ve Büyükşehir Belediyelerinde İl Mülki Sınırı Uygulaması [Rural Area Municipalism and Provincial Administrative Boundary Application in Metropolitan Municipalities in Turkey], Türk İdare Dergisi, Yıl: 85. Sayı: 476, 353-381.
  • KJAER, U., U. HJELMAR and A. L. OLSEN. (2010). Municipal Amalgamations and The Democratic Functioning of Local Councils: The Case of The Danish 2007 Structural Reform. Local Hovernment Studies. 36. 4, 569-585.
  • MCKAY, R. B. (2004). Reforming Municipal Services after Amalgamation-The Challenge of Efficiency. The International Journal of Public Sector Management. 17. 1, 24-47.
  • MİLLİYET (2012), “CHP’li Günaydın’ın 29 Ekim Çıkışı”, 23 Ekim 2012, http://milliyet.com.tr, (erişim tarihi: 03 Nisan 2014).
  • NAKAZAWA, K. (2013). Cost Inefficiency of Municipalities after Amalgamation. Procedia Economics and Finance. 5, 581-588.
  • ÖNER, S. and L. M. ŞEN. (2008). 5747 Sayılı Yasanın Kentsel Alan Yönetimine Etkileri: Uşak Kentsel Alan Örneği [Law no. 5747 on the Effects of Urban Space Management: Uşak Urban Areas Case], Yurttaş R, Köseoğlu Ö. ve Gülener S. (der.) 1. Ulusal Yerel Yönetimler Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı içinde, İstanbul: Erkam Matbaa, 419-444.
  • REİNGEWERTZ, Y. (2012). Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? Evidence from Municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics. 72, 240-251.
  • SLACK, E. and R. BIRD. (2013a). Merging Municipalities: Is Bigger Better? IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance. 14, 1-34. ISSN: 1927-1921.
  • SLACK, E. and R. BIRD. (2013b). Does Municipal Amalgamation Strengthen the Financial Viability of Local Government? A Canadian Example. Public Finance and Management. 13. 2, 99-123. ISSN: 1523-9721.
  • SPICER, Z. (2012). Post-Amalgamaiton Politics: How Does Consolidation Impact Community Decision-Making? Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 21. 2, 90-111.
  • SWIANIEWICZ, P. (2002). Size of Local Governments: International Context and Theoretical Framework. Published by: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative. In Consolidation or Fragmentation? The Size of Local Gorvernments in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Pawel Swianiewicz, 5-29. Budapest-Hungary.
  • TBMM [The Grand National Assembly of Turkey]. (2008). 117 Sayılı Komisyon Raporu [117 Order Numbered Commission Report]. http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/sirasayi/donem23/yil01/ss117.pdf (erişim tarihi: 09 Aralık 2013).
  • TBMM [The Grand National Assembly of Turkey]. (2012). 338 Sayılı Komisyon Raporu [338 Order Numbered Commission Report]. http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/sirasayi/donem24/yil01/ss338.pdf (erişim tarihi: 09 Aralık 2013).
  • TÜİK [Turkish Statistical Institute]. (2013). Nüfus İstatistikleri [Address Based Population Registration System Results], http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/adnksdagitapp/adnks.zul (erişim tarihi: 13 Ocak 2014).
  • ULUSOY, N. (2002). Performans Denetimi [Performance Audit], Mali Kılavuz, Yıl 5. Sayı: 17, Temmuz-Eylül.
  • VOJNOVIC, I. (1998). Municipal Consolidation in the 1990s: An Analysis of British Columbia, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. Canadian Public Administration, 41. 2, 239-283.
  • VOJNOVIC, I. (2000). The Transitional Impacts of Municipal Consolidations. Journal of Urban Affairs. 22. 4, 385-417. ISSN: 0735-2166.
  • YAYED [Research, Help and Education Organisation for Local Government]. (2012). Bütünşehir Kanunu Ne Getirmektedir? [What Does Metropolitan Act Bring?] http://www.yayed.org/id287-incelemeler/buyuksehir-kanunu-ne-getirmektedir.php (erişim tarihi: 03 Ocak 2013).