ÖĞRETMENLERİN PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE DÜZEYLERİ İLE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELİ İLE İNCELENMESİ

Öğretmenlerin örgütsel psikolojik sermaye düzeyleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak incelenmesini amaçlayan bu çalışmada ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya 2016-2017 eğitim öğretim yılı içerisinde İstanbul'da M.E.B.'na bağlı okullarda öğretmenlik yapan %62,2'si (346 kişi) kadın, %37,8'i (210 kişi) erkek toplam 556 öğretmen katılmıştır. Araştırma verilerini toplamak amacıyla "Örgütsel psikolojik sermaye ölçeği" ve "Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ölçeği" kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada öncelikle kullanılan ölçeklerle toplanılan verilerin geçerlilik güvenilirlik çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Verilerin geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği sağlandıktan sonra araştırmanın temel amacına cevap vermek için yapısal eşitlik modeli (YEM) kullanılmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve yapısal eşitlik model sonuçları CFI, RMSEA, ve SRMR değerleri göz önünde bulundurularak değerlendirilmiştir. Kurulan modelde, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının alt boyutları olan yardımlaşma, centilmenlik, vicdan ve sivil erdemin örgütsel psikolojik sermayenin alt boyutları olan iyimserlik, psikolojik dayanıklılık, umut ve özyeterlik arasındaki ilişkiler değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları veri toplamak amacıyla kullanılan ölçeklerin geçerli ve güvenilir olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Çalışmada kurulan yapısal eşitlik modeli için hesaplanan uyum indeksleri modelin veriye uygun olduğunu göstermiştir. Buna göre öğretmenlerin örgütsel psikolojik sermaye düzeylerinin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarını anlamlı düzeyde yordadığı sonucu bulunmuştur. Bu bulguya göre öğretmenlerin sahip oldukları psikolojik sermaye düzeyleri arttıkça, kendilerinden beklenen örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarında da belirgin bir yükseliş olmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar ilgili literatür ışığında tartışılmış ve ileriye dönük önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHERS’ PSCYHOLOGICAL CAPITAL LEVELS AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOURS WITH STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING

The relational screening model was used in the study that aims to examine the relationship between teachers' Organizational psychological capital levels and Organizational citizenship behaviors using structural equation modeling. A total of 556 teachers, 62.2% (346) of them were female and 37.8% (210) of them were male, teaching in the schools of MoNE in İstanbul during the 2016-2017 academic year participated in the research. "Organizational psychological capital scale" and "Organizational citizenship behaviors scale" were used to collect research data. In the study, the validity and reliability studies of the data collected with the scales used were primarily carried out. After the validity and reliability of the data were ensured, the structural equation model (SEM) was used to answer the main purpose of the research. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation model results were evaluated by considering CFI, RMSEA, and SRMR values. The relationships between helping each other, gentlemanship, conscience and civic virtue, which are the sub-dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior, and optimism, psychological endurance, hope and self-efficacy, which are the sub-dimensions of organizational psychological capital, were evaluated in the model established. The research findings have revealed that the scales used to collect data are valid and reliable. The fit indices calculated for the structural equation model established in the study have shown that the model is in compliance with the data. Accordingly, it was concluded that teachers' organizational psychological capital levels significantly predict their organizational citizenship behaviors. According to this finding, teachers' psychological capital levels increase, there is also a marked rise in organizational citizenship behavior expected from them. The results obtained were discussed in the light of the related literature and prospective proposals were made.The changes experienced in the field of science and technology at an unprecedented pace especially in the recent period have also forced all social structures to change and have led to the occurrence of significant change especially in the roles and duties of the employees of the organization. Educational organizations, which are at the center of social change as required by the mission they have, have received their share from this change. One of the most important components in education and training activities, which are the main activities of educational organizations, is certainly the teachers. Nowadays, individual successes of the teachers are needed more due to the examination system required by the Turkish education system. Indeed, it is known that the institutions that come to the forefront with the successes they achieved in the various examinations held at the nationwide have teachers who support the institution in certain fields. This situation shows that the competitive structure required by today's conditions is now inevitable in educational organizations. It is seen that the fact that the employees working in the competitive-based working environment only fulfill the tasks contained in their job descriptions is not sufficient for the survival of the organization they belong to. Therefore, today's organizations want employees who will also do the jobs that are not included in the job descriptions and will increase the success of the organization, they need such employees (Bozgeyikli and Şat, 2014). Nowadays, Organizational citizenship behaviors defined as the behaviors that are not compulsory in the duties and job descriptions of employees, that are evaluated outside of the task performance, that do not require the implementation of sanction in case of failure to do the jobs and that are mainly exhibited as a result of individual choice (Podsakoff et al., 2000) have come to the forefront as an important issue addressed in the studies carried out to increase the efficiency of organizations today. Organizational citizenship behaviors are mainly based on the characteristics of individuals and the attributes of the organization. Indeed, when the studies on organizational citizenship behaviors carried out in Turkey (Aktaş, 2008, Atalay, 2005; Ay, 2007; Bozgeyikli and Şat, 2014; Demirdağ, 2015; Karakuş, 2008; Keskin, 2005; Mercan, 2006; Özen, 2014; Samancı Kalaycı, 2007) are examined, it is seen that the effects of individual characteristics such as employees' authentic leadership, working value, self-efficacy level, focus of control, emotional intelligence, motivational language, psychological endurance, and the concepts such as organizational trust, organizational justice and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behaviors have been mainly discussed. However, very few studies have been conducted on the organizational psychological capital relationship, which increases both the performance of individuals within the organization and the productivity of the organization (Avey, Luthans, Youssef, 2010; Norman, Avey, Nimnicht and Pigeon, 2010). Psychological capital, defined as the positive development of the individual's psychology (Luthans, 2002a), is divided into factors such as optimism, hope, self-efficacy and psychological endurance that reflect the positive attitudes of the person. Among these factors, while hope refers to be determined in line with the specified purpose, optimism refers to be in expectation to be successful in the current situation and in the future. While self-confidence regarding the fact that difficult jobs will be overcome with sufficient effort is expressed as self-efficacy, the power to survive and eventually achieve success despite the difficulties and troubles is expressed as psychological endurance. When these four components come together, they create a superstructure by creating a synergetic effect (Luthans, Youssef and Avolio, 2007). When studies on psychological capital are examined, it is seen that psychological capital is mainly discussed in connection with the issues such as organizational commitment, job satisfaction, job continuity, job performance, and job-related stress level (Abbas and Raja, 2015). Indeed, studies on the issues such as the intention of leaving the job, job seeking behavior, signs of stress, rude, disrespectful behaviors in the workplace (Roberts, Scherer and Bowyer, 2011), business-life quality (Nguyen and Nguyen, 2011), organizational commitment and job satisfaction (Çetin and Basım, 2011), psychological ownership (Avey, Luthans and Jensen, 2009) have been carried out regarding the psychological capital in the literature. As it is mentioned above, there are very few studies addressing the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors and psychological capital. Therefore, in this study, an attempt to examine the relationship between teachers' organizational psychological capital levels and organizational citizenship behaviors was made using structural equation modeling. It is thought that the research findings will be an important source for the approaches to increase the productivity of the teachers. Method Since the relationship between teachers' organizational psychological capital levels and organizational citizenship behaviors was examined in this study, the relational screening model, which is a descriptive research method and tries to define the relationships between variables as they are, was determined as the research model. A total of 556 teachers teaching in the schools of MoNE in İstanbul in the 2016-2017 academic year participated in the research. 62.2% (346 people) of the teachers who participated in the research were female and 37.8% (210 people) of them were male. In addition, 33.8% (188 people) of the participants were working in primary school, 43.0% (239 people) were working in the secondary school and 23.2% of them were working in the high school. "Organizational psychological capital scale" and "Organizational psychological capital scale" were used to collect research data. In the study, the validity and reliability studies of the data collected with the scales used were primarily carried out. After the validity and reliability of the data were ensured, the structural equation model (SEM) was used to answer the main research question. The relationships between helping each other, gentlemanship, conscience and civic virtue, which are the sub-dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior, and optimism, psychological endurance, hope and self-efficacy, which are the sub-dimensions of organizational psychological capital, were evaluated in the model established. The WLSMV prediction method was used in the SEM as well as in the confirmatory factor analysis. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis and the structural equation model were evaluated by taking into account the CFI, RMSEA, and SRMR values. Results Within the scope of the reliability study carried out, Cronbach alpha values calculated for the data in the sub-dimensions of optimism, hope, psychological endurance and self-efficacy of the organizational psychological capital scale were found as 0.674, 0.678, 0.724 and 0.676, respectively. Besides, an alpha value of 0.910 was calculated for the whole scale. Cronbach alpha values calculated for the data in the subdimensions of helpfulness, gentlemanship, conscience and civic virtue of the organizational citizenship behavior scale were found as 0.876, 0.831, 0.773 and 0.815, respectively. The alpha value calculated for the whole organizational citizenship behavior scale is 0.905. Accordingly, these findings show that the data obtained from both scales are reliable at acceptable levels. According to the results of the confirmatory factor analysis performed within the scope of validity of the scales, the standard factor loads of the items in the organizational psychological capital scale vary between 0.653 and 0.927. According to the results of confirmatory factor analysis performed for the organizational citizenship behavior scale, the standard factor loads vary between 0.707 and 0.888. The fit indices found for both scales show the suitability of the model to the data in line with the critical values recommended by Hair et al. (2009). The facts that the factors found are high and that the fit indices show that the model is suitable for the data show that the data collected with the tools used in the study are valid. The fit indices (CFI, RMSEA and SRMR) calculated for the structural equation model established in the study show the suitability of the model to the data in line with the critical values recommended by Hair et al. (2009). R2 values found for the dependent (endogenous) variables of helping each other, gentlemanship, conscience and civic virtue are 34.3%, 30%, 35.7% and 40.3%, respectively. In the structural equation model, it was found that the dependent variable of helping each other was significantly predicted by the independent variables of optimism and self-efficacy. In the path analysis for the variable of helping each other, standard regression coefficients were found as 0.223 for optimism and 0.309 for self-efficacy. This means that the variable of helping each other increases by 0.223 standard deviation as optimism increases by 1 standard deviation. Similarly, the variable of helping each other increases by 0.309 standard deviation as self-efficacy increases by 1 standard deviation. The dependent variable of gentlemanship was only predicted significantly by the independent variables of optimism. The standard regression coefficient of 0.400 found for the variable of optimism indicates that the variable of gentlemanship increases by 0.400 standard deviation as the optimism increases by 1 standard deviation. The dependent variable of conscience was significantly predicted by all of the independent variables in the model. In the path analysis for the variable of conscience, the standard regression coefficient was found as 0.176 for optimism, 0.130 for hope, 0.191 for psychological endurance and 0.243 for self-efficacy. The dependent variable of civic virtue was significantly predicted by optimism, psychological endurance and self-efficacy. Standard regression coefficients were found as 0.248, 0.113 and 0.353 for optimism, psychological endurance and self-efficacy, respectively. According to the results of this research, the organizational citizenship behaviors expected from teachers significantly increase as their psychological capital levels increase. When the fact that the dimensions of psychological endurance, optimism and hope, especially self-efficacy, which are the components of the psychological capital, are measurable and developable is also taken into account, it is considered significant to carry out studies for the strengthening and development of teachers' psychological capitals. It is possible to increase the productivity of teachers and increase the quality of education by this way. Besides, it is possible to carry out researches in which the other variables that may be related to organizational psychological capital and organizational citizenship behaviors discussed in this study are also examined.

___

  • Abbas, M., & Raja, U. (2015). Impact of psychological capital on innovative performance and job stress. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 32(2), 128–138. http://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1314.
  • Aktaş, H. G. (2008). Öğretmenlerde denetim odağı ve örgütsel vatandaşlık. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyon.
  • Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Tisak, J., Deiana, G., Caria, S., & Caprara, G. V. (2012). The utility of positive orientation in predicting job performance and organisational citizenship behaviors. Applied Psychology, 61(4), 669–698.
  • Atalay Giderler, C. (2010). Personel Güçlendirme ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Bağlamında İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Atalay, İ. (2005). Örgütsel vatandaşlık ve örgütsel adalet, Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyon.
  • Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2010). The Additive Value of Positive Psychological Capital in Predicting Work Attitudes and Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(2), 430– 452. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308329961
  • Avey, J.B. ve Luthans, F. & Jensen, S.M. (2009). Psychological Capital: A Positive Resource for Combating Employee Stres and Turnover. Human Resource Management. 48:5. 677-693
  • Ay, B. (2007). Öğretmenlerin öz-yeterlikleri ve ÖVD, Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyon.
  • Bandura A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In VS Ramachaudran (Ed.). Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Bandura A. (2012). The role of self-efficacy in goal-based motivation. In E Locke, G Latham (Eds.). New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 147– 157). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus mean and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186-203.
  • Bozgeyikli, H. & Şat, A. (2014). Öğretmenlerde Psikolojik Dayanıklılık ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışlarının Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi: Özel Okul Örneği. HAK-İŞ uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 3(5), 172-191.
  • Çetin, F. & Basım, H. N. (2012). Örgütsel psikolojik sermaye: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 45(1), 121-137.
  • Çetin, F. ve Basım, H.N. (2011). Psikolojik Dayanıklılığın İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Tutumlarındaki Rolü. ‘’İşGüç’’ Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi. 13(3), 79- 94.
  • Demirdağ, S. (2015). Otantik Liderlik Ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışlarının Karşılaştırılması: Öğretmen Adayları, TURKISH STUDIES -International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic-, 10(15), 273-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8747
  • DiPaola, M. F. & Hoy, W. K. (2005). School Characteristics that foster organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of School Leadership, 15(4), 387-406.
  • DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(3), 327-346.
  • Durmuşçelebi, M. (2016). Öğretmenlik Eğitimi Programının Etkililiği. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 5 (5), 747-766.
  • Erdem, M. (1998). Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş, Ankara: Alkım Yayınları.
  • George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good–doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work–organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310
  • Güçlü, M. (2014). İlköğretim dergisinde yayımlanan öğretmenlik mesleği ile ilgili makalelerin değerlendirilmesi (1939-1966), Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 3(2014) 111-127
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7. bs.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apps.2012.61.issue-4.
  • Hui, Q., Cao, X., Lou, L.& He, H. (2014) Empirical research on the influence of organizational support on psychological capital. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 4(4), 1015-1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2014.44025
  • Karakaş, M. (2005). İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamalarının Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Üzerine Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Karakuş, M. (2008). İlköğretim okul yöneticilerinin ve öğretmenlerin duygusal zekâ yeterliklerinin, öğretmenlerin duygusal adanmışlık, örgütsel vatandaşlık ve iş doyumu düzeylerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
  • Keskin, S. (2005). Öğretmenlerde çalışma değerleri ve örgütsel vatandaşlık. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyon.
  • Liao, H., Liu, D. & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090–1109. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533207.
  • Liu, D., Chen, X.-P. & Holley, E. (2017), Help Yourself by Helping Others: The Joint Impact of Group Member Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Group Cohesiveness on Group Member Objective Task Performance Change. Personnel Psychology. 1-34. doi:10.1111/peps.12209
  • Luthans, F. & Avolio, B.J. (2009). The Point of Positive Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizatonal Behavior. 30(2), 291-307.
  • Luthans, F. & Youssef, C.M. (2004). Human, Social and Now Positive Psychological Capital Management. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143-160.
  • Luthans, F. (2002a). Positive Organizational Behavior: Developing and Managing Psychological Strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 6(1), 57-71.
  • Luthans, F. (2002b). The need for and meaming of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695–706. http://doi.org/10.1002/job.165
  • Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Peterson, S. J. (2010). The development and resulting performance impact of positive psychological capital. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1), 41–67. http://doi.org/10.1002/Hrdq.20034.
  • Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541–572. http://doi.org/DOI 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x
  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M. ve Avolio, B. J., (2007). Psychological Capital: Developingthe Human Competitive, Edge, Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
  • Mercan, M. (2006). Öğretmenlerde örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel yabancılaşma ve örgütsel vatandaşlık. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyon.
  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855.
  • Nguyen, T. D., & Nguyen, T. T. M. (2011). Psychological Capital, Quality of Work Life, and Quality of Life of Marketers: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Macromarketing, 32(1), 87–95. http://doi.org/10.1177/0276146711422065
  • Niranjana, P., & Pattanayak, B. (2005). Influence of learned optimism and organisational ethos on organisational citizenship behaviour: A study on Indian corporations. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 5(1), 85–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2005.005987
  • Norman, S. M., Avey, J. B., Nimnicht, J. L., & Graber Pigeon, N. (2010). The Interactive Effects of Psychological Capital and Organizational Identity on Employee Organizational Citizenship and Deviance Behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(4), 380–391. http://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809353764
  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior, The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA, Lexington Books.
  • Özen, H. (2014). Motivasyonel Dil Teorisi Işığında Okul Müdürlerinin Kullandığı Motivasyonel Dilin Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışlarına Olan Etkisi, TURKISH STUDIES -International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic-, 9(5), 1731-1746. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8747
  • Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1989). A second generation measure of organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B. & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestion for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
  • Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Paine, Julie B. ve Bachrach, Daniel G. (2000a). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Management. 26(3): 513-563.
  • Polat, S. (2007). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet algıları, örgütsel güven düzeyleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
  • Pradhan R. K., Jena L. K. & Bhattacharya P. (2016). Impact of psychological capital on organizational citizenship behavior: Moderating role of emotional intelligence. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1-16. doi:10.1080/23311975.2016.1194174.
  • Roberts, S., Scherer, L., & Bowyer, C. (2011). Job Stress and Incivility: What Role Does Psychological Capital Play? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(4), 449– 458. http://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811409044
  • Salvucci, S., Walter, E., Conley, V., Fink, S., & Saba, M. (1997). Measurement error studies at the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Washington D. C.: U. S. Department of Education.
  • Samancı Kalaycı, G. (2007). Örgütsel güven ve Örgütsel vatandaşlık Davranışları. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyon.
  • Shaheen, S., Bukhari, I., & Adil, A. (2016). Moderating role of psychological capital between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior and its dimensions. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 5(2), 41-50.
  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Thompson, B., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2000). Psychometrics is datametrics: The test is not reliable. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 174–195.
  • Van Dyne, L., Vandewalle, D., Kostova, T., Latham, M. E., & Cummings, L. L. (2000). Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 3–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379.
  • Yamg, M. H., Yang, H. W., Yeh, C. T., & Mui, W. C. (2013). The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological capital on sport burnout of junior high school physical education students. Life Science Journal, 10(3), 1946-1956.
  • Zhong, L. (2007). Effects of psychological capital on employees’ job performance, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviour. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 328– 334.