Kamu Borcu Büyüme İlişkisi: Kırılgan Sekizli Ülkeler için Heterojen Panel Veri Analizi

Kamu kesiminde artan borç stokunun büyümeyi nasıl etkilediği sorusuna literatürde gösterilen ilgi giderek artmaktadır. Geçmişte yapılan araştırmalar gelişmiş ülkeler üzerine yoğunlaşsa da borç-büyüme ilişkisi gelişmekte olan ülkeler için de önem arz etmektedir. Bu bağlamda, yüksek enflasyon, cari açık ve dış kaynak bağımlılığından dolayı “Kırılgan Sekizli” olarak isimlendirilen Arjantin, Brezilya, Endonezya, Güney Afrika, Hindistan, Rusya, Şili ve Türkiye için kamu borç stoku ve büyüme arasındaki ilişki ele alınmıştır. İncelemeye konu olan bu ülkeler için 1992-2017 dönemine ait yıllık veriler kullanılarak panel veri analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ele alınan veri setinin uzun dönem katsayılarının tahmini için Genişletilmiş Ortalama Grup (AMG) ve Ortak İlişkili Etkiler Modeli (CCE) tahmincilerine dayalı hata düzeltme modeli kullanılmıştır. Bu yöntemler hem kesit bağımlılığını, hem de kesitler arasındaki parametrelerin değişkenliklerini göz önüne aldığından bunların varlığı etkin bir yöntemlerdir. Bulunan sonuçlara göre hem grup düzeyinde hem de ülke düzeyinde kamu borç stokunda yaşanan bir artışın büyüme üzerinde negatif bir etkisi bulunmaktadır.Bu durumun altında yatan neden söz konusu ülkelerde özellikle bütçe açığı ve cari açık sorunlarının süreklilik arz etmesi ve alınan borcun bu açıkların finansmanında kullanılmasıdır. Bu sebeple ülke hükümetleri doğrudan yabancı yatırımların kendilerini tercih etmesi için gerekli olanhukuki, iktisadi, fiziki ve beşerî altyapıyı sağlamalarının ne kadar önemli olduğu gözden geçirilmelidir.

Public Debt-Growth Nexus: Heterogeneous Panel Data Analysis for Fragile Eight Countries

There is a growing interest in the literature on the question of how the increased debt stock affects growth in the public sector. Although researches focus on developed countries, the debt-growth relationship is important for developing countries also. In this connection, due to high inflation, current account deficit and foreign resource dependency, the relationship between public debt stock and growth are discussed for "Fragile Octet" named as Argentina, Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa, India, Russia, Chile, and Turkey. Panel data analysis was carried out for these countries subject to research, using annual data from 1992-2017. Error correction model based on Extended Average Group (AMG) and Common Associated Effects Model (CCE) estimators were used for the estimation of the long-term coefficients of the data set discussed. These methods are effective methods considering both the cross-section dependency and the parameter differences between the cross-sections. According to the results, an increase in public debt stock at both group and country-level has a negative effect on growth. The underlying reason for this situation is especially the continuity of budget deficit and current account deficit problems in these countries and the use of debt to finance these deficits. For this reason, governments of the country should be reviewed how important to provide the legal, economic, physical, and human infrastructure required for foreign direct investments to prefer themselves.

___

  • Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2007). Disease and development: the effect of life expectancy on economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 115(6), 925-985.https://doi.org/10.1086/529000
  • Aizenman, J., & Lee, J. (2007). International reserves: precautionary versus mercantilist views, theory and evidence. Open Economies Review, 18(2), 191-214.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-007-9030-z
  • Anaya, P., & Pienkowski, A. (2015). What really drives public debt: A holistic approach, (No. 15-137). International Monetary Fund.
  • Aschauer, D.A., (2000). Do states optimize? Public capital and economic growth. The Annals of Regional Science 34, 343–363.
  • Ayadi, F. S., & Ayadi, F. O. (2008). The impact of external debt on economic growth: A comparative study of Nigeria and South Africa. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 10(3), 234-264.
  • Babu, J. O., Kiprop, S., Kalio, A. M., & Gisore, M. (2014). External debt and economic growth in the East Africa community. African Journal of Business Management, 8(21), 1011-1018.https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2014.7418
  • Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q. & Kao, C. (2012). A lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics, 170, 164-177.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.04.004
  • Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth?. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095-1117.
  • Baum, A., Checherita-Westphal, C., & Rother, P. (2013). Debt and growth: New evidence for the euro area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 32, 809-821.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.07.004
  • Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003). The demographic dividend: A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change. Rand Corporation.
  • Bloom, D. E., Sachs, J. D., Collier, P., & Udry, C. (1998). Geography, demography, and economic growth in Africa. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1998(2), 207-295.https://doi.org/10.2307/2534695
  • Breusch, T. S. & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
  • Cecchetti, S. G., & Kharroubi, E. (2012). Reassessing the impact of finance on growth. (BIS Working Paper No. 381).Bank for International Settlements. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2117753
  • Čeh Časni, A., Andabaka Badurina, A., & Basarac, M. (2014, June). Public debt and growth: evidence from Central, Eastern and Southeastern European countries. In Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics.Journal of Economics and Business 32(1), 35-51.
  • Checherita-Westphal, C., & Rother, P. (2012). The impact of high government debt on economic growth and its channels: An empirical investigation for the euro area. European Economic Review, 56(7), 1392-1405.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.06.007
  • Chowdhury, A. (2001). External debt and growth in developing countries: a sensitivity and causal analysis.(WIDER-Discussion Papers.No.95). World Institute for Development Economics Research. https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1490&context=econ_fac
  • Çiçek, H., Gözegir, S., & Çevik, E. (2010). Bir maliye politikası aracı olarak borçlanma ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği (1990–2009).C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 141-156.
  • Dincă, G., & Dincă, M. S. (2015). Public debt and economic growth in the EU post-communist countries. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 18(2), 119-132.
  • DiPeitro, W. R., & Anoruo, E. (2012). Government size, public debt and real economic growth: a panel analysis. Journal of Economic Studies,39(4), 410-419.https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581211255620
  • Eberhardt, M. & Teal, F. (2010). Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production.(Economics Series Working Papers. No.515).University of OxfordDepartment of Economics Discussion Paper Series. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ea831625-9014-40ec-abc5-516ecfbd2118/download_file?file_format=pdf&safe_filename=paper515.pdf&type_of_work=Working+paper
  • Eberhart M., & Bond, S.R. (2009). Cross-sectional dependence in non-stationary panel models: A novel estimator. (MPRA Paper. No. 17692).University Library of Munich.t https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17692/
  • Égert, B. (2015). Public debt, economic growth and nonlinear effects: Myth or reality?. Journal of Macroeconomics, 43, 226-238.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.11.006
  • Elmendorf, D. W., & Mankiw, N. G. (1998). Government debt.(Working No. 1820).Harvard Institute of Economic Research.
  • Gallup, J. L., Sachs, J. D., & Mellinger, A. D. (1999). Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review, 22(2), 179-232.https://doi.org/10.1177/016001799761012334
  • Grennes, T., Caner, M., & Koehler-Geib, F. (2010). Finding the tipping point--when sovereign debt turns bad.The World Bank.
  • Kim, E., Ha, Y., & Kim, S. (2017). Public debt, corruption and sustainable economic growth. Sustainability, 9(3), 433.https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030433
  • Lopes da Veiga, J. A., Ferreira‐Lopes, A., & Sequeira, T. N. (2016). Public debt, economic growth and inflationin African economies. South African Journal of Economics, 84(2), 294-322.https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12104
  • Lorentzen, P., McMillan, J., & Wacziarg, R. (2008). Death and development. Journal of Economic Growth, 13(2), 81-124.
  • Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407-437.
  • Minea, A., & Parent, A. (2012). Is high public debt always harmful to economic growth?Reinhart and Rogoff and some complex nonlinearities. (Working Paper, No.12-08).Association Franaise de Cliomtrie (AFC). http://publi.cerdi.org/ed/2012/2012.18.pdf
  • Panizza, U., & Presbitero, A. F. (2013). Public debt and economic growth in advanced economies: A survey. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 149(2), 175-204.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (1996). Testing for the’Existence of a Long-run Relationship’.(Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, No.9622). University of Cambridge.https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/camcamdae/9622.htm
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels(Working PaperNo.435). University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.5113
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  • Pesaran, H. M. Ullah, A. & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM Test of error cross‐section independence, The Econometrics Journal, 11,105-127. http://doi.org.10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
  • Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time ofdebt. American Economic Review, 100(2), 573-78.https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.573
  • Saint-Paul, G. (1992). Fiscal policy in an endogenous growth model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4), 1243-1259.
  • Smyth, D. J., & Hsing, Y. (1995). In search of an optimal debt ratio for economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 13(4), 51-59.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1995.tb00731.x
  • Spilioti, S. (2015). The relationship between the governmentdebt and GDP growth: evidence of the Euro area countries. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 12(1), 174-178.
  • Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-223.https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
  • Zouhaier, H., & Fatma, M. (2014). Debt and economic growth. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(2), 440-448.