Uygulamaları Gerçekleştiren Öğretmen ve Öğrencilerin Fen Eğitiminde Etkileşimli EKitap Kullanımına İlişkin Görüşleri

Bilişim ve iletişim teknolojilerinde gelişime paralel olarak fen bilimleri öğretim programlarına ve ders ortamlarına teknoloji entegrasyonu yapılmaya başlanmış ve kitapların teknoloji destekli öğretime uyumlu hale getirilerek Milli Eğitim ve ilgili kuruluşlar tarafından eğitsel e-içerikler oluşturulmaya başlanmıştır. Bu duruma paralel olarak yapılan çalışmada, uygulamaları gerçekleştiren öğretmen ve öğrencilerin etkileşimli e-kitaba ilişkin görüşlerinin alınması amaçlanmıştır. Durum çalışmasına uygun olarak gerçekleştirilen bu araştırma, Bursa ilindeki üç farklı ortaokulda görev yapan üç öğretmen ve onların sınıflarında öğrenim gören 71 öğrenci ile sürdürülmüştür. Çalışmada HTML formatında hazırlanan etkileşimli e-kitap araştırmacı tarfından geliştirilmiştir. Veri toplama aracı olarak öğrenci görüş formu, öğrenci görüşme formu ve öğretmen görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler içerik ve betimsel analize uygun olarak analiz edilmiştir. Öğretmenlerden elde edilen bulgularda; etkileşimli e-kitabın öğretmenler tarafından beğenildiği, faydalı bulunduğu anlaşılmıştır. Bu durumun temel nedeninin; etkileşimli e-kitabın düzenli, sistemli ve kazanımlara paralel olarak aşamalı bir sistem şeklinde hazırlanmasından kaynaklandığı düşünülmektedir. Bununla birlikte yapılan çalışmada öğrencilerin etkileşimli e-kitabı beğendikleri ve güzel bulduklar ifade etmişlerdir. Bu bağlamda farklı fen konularında benzer etkileşimli e-kitap örneklerinin oluşturulabileği söylenebilir.

Views on Interactive E-Book Use in Science Education of Teachers and Students Who Perform E-book Applications

In parallel with the development in information and communication technologies, technologyintegration has been initiated in science education programs and lesson environments, and educationale-contents have been created by National Education and related institutions by making the bookscompatible with technology supported education. In parallel with this situation, the aim of the studywas to obtain the interactive e-book views of the teachers and students performing the applications.This research, conducted in accordance with the case study, was carried out with three teachers workingin three different secondary schools in Bursa and 71 students studying in their classrooms. Interactivee-book prepared in HTML format was developed by the researcher. The student opinion form, studentinterview form and teacher interview form were used as data collection tools. The data obtained wereanalyzed in accordance with the content and descriptive analysis. In the findings obtained from theteachers, it was understood that the teachers liked the interactive e-book and found it useful. The mainreason for this is thought to be that the interactive e-book was prepared as a progressive system in linewith the regular, systematic and curriculum objectives. In addition, students stated that they liked theinteractive e-book and found it beautiful. In this context, it can be said that similar interactive e-bookexamples can be created in different science subjects.

PDF

___

Altınbaş Akbaş, O., & Pektaş, H. (2011). The effects of using an interactive whiteboard on the academic achievement of university students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 1-19.
Alfrijat, A. M., Al-Msie’deen, R., & Alhalhouli, Z. T. (2010). Interactive book as e-training material for the eduwave system in Jordan. Advances in Computer Science and Engineering, 5(1), 97-104.
Al-Qassabi, H., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2013). Applying Gagne’s nine events in the design of an interactive ebook to learn 3D animation. Advances in Computing, 3(3), 60-72.
Arslan, A. S. (2014). Folk culture and enriched books: Evaluation of digital tools and enrichment tools with examples “E-Anagnosis”. Cankiri Karatekin University Journal of Faculty of Letters, 4(4), 87.
Aydın, G. (2015). The effects of computer-aided concept cartoons and outdoor science activities on light pollution. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2), 143-156.
Barate, A., Ludovico, L. A., & Mangione, G. R. (2014, July). A new paradigm for music education: Creating active e-books through the IEEE 1599 Standard. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference, Athens, Greece.
Başarmak, U., & Mahiroğlu, A. (2015). Student opinions on the animated cartoons used in online learning environment. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 6(19), 234-253.
Baughman, M., Ehmann, M., & Vilcheck, A. (2013). The effects of iBooks biology on student science achievement and motivation. Always Learning, Pearson.
Bayram, Z. (2015). Investigating difficulties that preservice science teachers encounter while designing guided inquiry activities. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(2), 15-29.
Belveal, L. K. (2016). No Nā Hale: Developing an interactive iBook to promote learning for the Hawaiian ımmersion lower elementary classroom. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/40216/2/TCCPaper2.pdf adresinden 21.09.2016 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Bozkurt, A. (2013). Defining evaluation criteria for interactive e-books for open and distance learning (Unpublished Master Thesis). Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Bozkurt, A., & Bozkaya, M. (2013a). Interactive e-book preparation steps as a learning material. Journl of Educational Policy Analysis, 2(2), 8-20.
Bozkurt, A., & Bozkaya, M. (2013b, Ocak). Interactive e-book: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Academic Informatics Conference, Antalya, 375-381.
Brajković, M. (2014). Tools and methodologies for developing interactive electronic books (Doctoral dissertation). Grafički fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu.
Campbell, C., & Martin, D. (2010). Interactive whiteboards and the first year experience: Integrating IWBs into pre-service teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 68-75.
Chen, C. C., & Chen, C. M. (2011, July). The application of interactive media display technology in environmental science learning. HCI International 2011, Japan.
Choi, J., Lee, Y., & Kim, K. (2014). An HTML5-based interactive e-book reader. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 8(2), 67- 74.
Choiriyah, N. (2015). Developing of interactive e-book media on subject matter of chemicals in daily life for high school deaf student. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 4(1), 119-125.
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science scope, 23(6), 42-44.
Colburn, A. (2004). Inquiring scientists want to know. Educational Leadership, 62, 63-67.
Çepni, S. (2018). Introduction to research and project studies. Trabzon: Celepler Printing.
Çepni, S., & Çil, E. (2009). Science and technology program (diagnostics, planning, implementation and association with SBS) primary and primary education manual. Ankara: PegemA Publishing.
Dalacosta, K., Kamariotaki-Paparrigopoulou, M., Palyvos, J. A., & Spyrellis, N. (2009). Multimedia application with animated cartoons for teaching science in elementary education. Computers & Education, 52(4), 741-748.
Daşdemir, İ., Uzoğlu, M., & Cengiz, E. (2012). The effect of use of animations in unit of body systems on the academic achievements of the 7th students, retention of the knowledge learned, and the scientific process skills. Trakya University Journal of Education, 2(2), 54-62.
Doğan, D., Murat, Ç., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). “One laptop per child” projects and FATIH project: A comparative examination. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 3(1) 1-26.
Emron, S., & Dhindsa, H. S. (2010). Integration of interactive whiteboard technology to improve secondary science teaching and learning. International Journal of Research and Engineering (IJRE), 28, 1-24.
Erdoğdu, E. (2016). Interactive ebooks in the context of open and distance learning: Interaction, technology, production size and examples. Journal of Open Education Practices and Research, 2(3), 88-114.
Erduran, A., & Tataroğlu, B. (2009, May). Comparison of science and mathematics teacher views regarding the use of smart board in education. 9th International Educational Technology Conference, Ankara, Turkey.
Erişti, S. D., Uluuysal, B., & Dindar, M. (2013). Designing an interactive learning environment based on theories of visual perception and students’ views about the software. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 3(1), 47-66.
Gadbois, S. A., & Haverstock, N. (2012). Middle years science teachers voice their first experiences with interactive whiteboard technology. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 12(1), 121-135.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
Gasouka, M., Kapaniaris, A., Arvanitidou, Z., Foulidi, X., & Raptou, E. (2013, March). Folk culture and digital enriched books: The case study of the digital enriched tool “eanagnosis”. 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain.
Gebya Oktammeria, H., & Novita, D. (2012). The assessment of student’s mind mapping result on limited trial towards bilingual interactive e-book media through mind mapping strategy on chemical bonding matter for SMA RSBI. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1), 115-123.
Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693-705.
Gümüş, S., Güler, E., Güler, C., & Erorta, Ö. (2012, November). Interactive ebook design tools for mobile devices. XVII. Internet Conference in Turkey, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Hakkari, F., Yeloğlu, T., Tüysüz, C., & İlhan, N. (2017). Development of an instructional material for an enriched book relating to "interactions between chemical types" unit in the ninth grade chemistry curriculum and investigation its effects. Education and Science, 42(192), 327-348.
Hakverdi-Can, M., & Sönmez, D. (2012). Learning how to design a technology supported inquiry-based learning environment. Science Education International, 23(4), 338-352.
Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102-117.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 283-301.
Kara, M., & Keş, Y. (2016). Interactive e-book as a learning tool. Art-e Art Journal, 9(17), 189- 209.
Karakuş, U. (2006). The effect of experimental method atstudents? Success level while teaching climate subject in geography (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
Karakuyu, Y., Bilgin, İ., & Sürücü, A. (2013). Effect of inquiry based learning approaches on university students’ academic achievement and science process skills in general physics laboratory course. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 10(21), 237-250.
Khan, B. H. (Ed.). (1997). Web-based instruction. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
Kırbağ Zengin, F., Kırılmazkaya, G., & Keçeci, G. (2012). Elemantary students use of smart board the effect of achievement and attitude in science and technology course. EJournal of New World Sciences Academy, 7(2), 526-537.
Kızılaslan, A., Sözbilir, M., & Yaşar, M. D. (2012). Inquiry based teaching in Turkey: A content analysis of research reports. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(4), 599-617.
Kwasu, I. A., Yalams, S. M., & Ema, E. (2016). Using design & animation concepts to produce animated instructional resources that can facilitate open distance learning in science and technology education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(17), 166-170.
Laili, M. I., & Novita, D. (2014). The assessment result of mind mapping in implementation of bilingual interactive e-book media through mind mapping strategy on chemical bonding. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 3(1), 83-87.
Llewellyn, D. (2014). Inquiry within: Implementing inquiry- based science standarts. USA: Corwinn Pres, Inc. A Sage Publications Company.
Luaran, J. E., Rom, K. B. M., Nadzri, F. A., & Jain, J. (2016). E-book usage in teaching science: The perspectives of science teachers in secondary schools in Selangor. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 13-27.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87-99.
Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2010). A project to increase technology opportunities in education, to improve technology (FATIH). Ankara: General Directorate of Innovation and Educational Technologies.
Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2013). Open guided inquiry laboratory in physics teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 449-474.
O'Mahony, N. (2014). Cognitive learning and motivation of first year secondary school students using an interactive and multimedia-enhanced e-book made with ibooks author. Irish Journal of Academic Practice, 3(1), 1-34.
Ourania, P., Symeon, R., Ioannis, P. George, S., & Spyridoula, L. (2014, June). Inquiry based learning in primary education: a case study using mobile digital science lab. Thinking Assessment in Science and Mathematics - Science and Mathematics Education Conference, Dublin.
Önder, F., & Sılay, İ. (2016). The effect of enriched e-book supported laboratuary activities on pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer-supported education. Journal of Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education, 16(3), 945-960.
Özer, S., & Türel, Y. K. (2015). ICT teacher candidates’ metaphoric perceptions of e-book and interactive e-book. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 1-23.
Özoğlu, Y., Kaysi, F., & Özoğlu, F. (2014). Production epub standard curriculum course content for mobile devices. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 3(1), 196-206.
Özöğüt Erorta, Ö., & Kayabaş, İ. (2015, February). Anadolu university interactive e-Book project. Academic Informatics, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Phadung, M. (2015, December). Interactive e-book design and development to support literacy learning for language minority students. 2015 World Congress on Sustainable Technologies (WCST), London.
Sarı, U., & Güven, G. B. (2013). The effect of interactive whiteboard supported inquirybased learning on achievement and motivation in physics and views of prospective teachers toward the instruction. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 110-143.
Shih, B. Y., Chen, T. H., Cheng, M. H., Chen, C. Y., & Chen, B. W. (2013). How to manipulate interactive E-book on learning natural catastrophe—an example of structural mechanics using power machine. Natural Hazards, 65(3), 1637-1652.
Sing, K. M., & Chew, C. (2009, November). An inquiry approach in learning science with engaging web-based multimedia interactive resources. International Science Education Conference, Singapore.
Soga, T., Nakahara, T., Kawana, N., Fuse, I., & Nakamura, Y. (2015, October). Interactive learning using e-books connected with moodle and development of sharing environments for teaching materials. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education.
Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128-150.
Steininger, R., & Lembens, A. (2012, September). Involving students in research on the use and construction of concept cartoons for chemistry classes. ESERA 2011 Conference, Science Learning and Citizenship, Lyon, France.
Stephenson, P., & Warwick, P. (2002). Using concept cartoons to support progression in students' understanding of light. Physics Education, 37(2), 135-141. Sweeney, T. (2013). Understanding the use of interactive whiteboards in primary science. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 217-232.
Tania, L., & Fadiawati, N. (2015). Development of interactive e-book based on chemical representation refer to curriculum 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(2), 164- 169.
Tatar, N., & Kuru, M. (2009). Inquiry- based learning approach versus descriptive methods: effects on elementary students’ attitudes towards science. Pamukkale University journal of Education, 25, 153-165.
TUSIAD (2017). 2023 towards STEM requirement in Turkey. It was obtained from http://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/9735-2023-e-dog-ru-tu-rkiye-de-stemgeneration on 26.03.2018.
Türkmen, H. (2009). An effect of technology based inquiry approach on the learning of" Earth, Sun, & Moon" subject. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 10(1), 1-20.
Varol, F., Özer, S., & Türel, Y. K. (2014). ARCS motivasyon modeline yönelik tasarlanan zkitaplara ilişkin görüşler. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 3(3), 1-8.
Wirawan, I., & Unesa, J. K. F. (2012). The development of international standard curriculum interactive chemistry e-book on acids, bases and salts topic at grade VII OF SMP. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1), 230-234.
Wu, P. L., Wu, L. C., Shih, W. L., & Wu, M. L. (2014). A comparison study on the influence of implementing inquiry-based instruction on science learning motivation and interest. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 3(3), 74-82.
Yakışan, M., Yel, M., & Mutlu, M. (2013). Student’s view for using computer animations on teaching biology. Turkish Journal of Education, 2(3), 30-39.
Yang, K. T., Wang, T. H., & Kao, Y. C. (2012). How an interactive whiteboard impacts a traditional classroom. Education as Change, 16(2), 313-332.