Saniye Tuğba TOKEL, Ali BATTAL

3B Sanal Dünyalarda Tasarlanan Bir Programlama Dersinde Öğrencilerin Memnuniyetine Etki Eden Faktörlerin İncelenmesi

Bu çalışmanın amacı 3B sanal dünyalarda programlamanın temellerini öğretmeyi amaçlayan bir derste öğrencilerin memnuniyet seviyelerini ortaya çıkarmak ve öğrencilerin memnuniyetine etki eden faktörleri belirlemektir. Bu amaçla araştırma yöntemi olarak üç farklı eğitim programında uygulanmış çoklu durum çalışması seçilmiştir. Bu durum çalışmaları sırasıyla müfredata entegre (Durum 1), müfredat dışı (Durum 2) ve okul sonrası (Durum 3) şeklinde eğitim programlarında uygulanmıştır. Alanyazındaki çalışmalardan faydalanılarak uyarlanan memnuniyet ölçeği ile öğrencilerin memnuniyet düzeyi ölçülerken, öğrenci ve öğretmenler ile yapılan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ile memnuniyete etki eden faktörler ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Nicel verilerin analizinde betimsel analiz yöntemleri kullanılmış olup Durum 1 (M = 4.35), Durum-3 (M = 4.28) ve Durum-2’nin (M = 3.99) öğrencileri sırasıyla, bu ortamlarda verilen programlama dersinden en çok memnun olan öğrenciler olarak belirlenmiştir. Nitel verilerin tekli durum analizi sonuçları memnuniyeti artıran ve azaltan faktörleri ortaya çıkarmıştır. Görevlerin hikayesi dışında, grup çalışması, obje oluşturma, görevlerin olması, görev dışı aktiviteler, 3B ortam ve ortamda gezinme her üç durum çalışmasında da değişken oranlarda memnuniyeti artıran faktörler olarak bulunmuştur. Teknik problemler, yalnız çalışma, görevlerin zorluğu ve avatar ile ilgili problemler her üç durum çalışmasının öğrencileri tarafından memnuniyeti azaltan faktörler olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Durumlar arası analiz sonuçları ise her üç durum çalışması sonuçlarının benzerlik ve farklılıklarını belirten bir tablo ile sunulmuştur.

Investigating the Factors Affecting Students’ Satisfaction in a Programming Course Designed in 3D Virtual Worlds

The main purpose of this study is to understand the satisfaction level of students to teach the basics ofprogramming in 3D virtual worlds and investigate the factors affecting their satisfaction. Multiple casestudy with three cases were conducted in three different educational programs: as curricular (Case-1),extra-curricular (Case-2) and after-school (Case-3). Satisfaction scale adopted from previous study wasused to understand current level of satisfaction and semi-structured interviews were conducted withparticipants to reveal factors affecting satisfaction. Descriptive analysis of quantitative data showed thatthat the most satisfied students were those from Case-1 (M = 4.35), Case-3 (M = 4.28) and Case-2(M = 3.99), respectively. Single case analysis of qualitative data revealed the factors increasing anddecreasing satisfaction of the students. Apart from the story about the tasks, group study, objectconstruction, having tasks, off-task activities, 3D environment and tour in the environment emerged asan increasing factor across all three cases at different ratios. Technical problems, studying alone,difficulty of the tasks, and avatar-related problems were the factors stated by some of the students acrossall cases as decreasing factors. Cross-case analysis provided a table which shows the similarities anddifferences among the cases.

PDF

___

Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained : embrace change. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=318762
Berland, M. (2017). Constructionist Learning. In K. Peppler (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Out-of-School Learning (Vol. 1, pp. 139–141). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385198.n59
Bishop-Clark, C., Courte, J., & Howard, E. V. (2006). Programming in Pairs with Alice to Improve Confidence, Enjoyment, and Achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.2190/CFKF-UGGC-JG1Q-7T40
Brennan, K. (2013). Best of Both Worlds: Issues of Structure and Agency in Computational Creation, in and Out of School. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Cambridge, MA.
Buffum, P. S., Frankosky, M., Boyer, K. E., Wiebe, E., Mott, B., & Lester, J. (2015). Leveraging collaboration to improve gender equity in a game-based learning environment for middle school computer science. 2015 Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2015.7296496
Choudhury, J., & Banerjee, I. (2012). Programming in Virtual Worlds for Educational Requirements: LSL Scripting and Environment Development Challenges. International Journal of Computer Science Research and Application, 2(3), 30–41.
Crellin, J., Duke-Williams, E., Chandler, J., & Collinson, T. (2009). Virtual worlds in computing education. Computer Science Education, 19(4), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400903384950
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. In Educational Research (4th ed., Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
Dawley, L., & Dede, C. (2014). Situated Learning in Virtual Worlds and Immersive Simulations. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 723–734). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_58
Delwiche, A. (2006). Massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) in the new media classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 160–172.
Dickey, M. D. (2005a). Brave new (interactive) worlds: A review of the design affordances and constraints of two 3D virtual worlds as interactive learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1–2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820500173714
Dickey, M. D. (2005b). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 439–451.
Dieterle, E., & Clarke, J. (2006). Multi-User Virtual Environments for Teaching and Learning. In M. Pagani (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Multimedia Technology and Networking (2nd Edition, Vol. 2, pp. 1033–1041). Retrieved from http://muve.gse.harvard.edu/rivercityproject
Dreher, C., Reiners, T., Dreher, N., & Dreher, H. (2009). Virtual Worlds as a Context Suited for Information Systems Education : Discussion of Pedagogical Experience and Curriculum Design with Reference to Second Life. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 211–225.
Duncan, I., Miller, A., & Jiang, S. (2012). A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01263.x
Esteves, M., Fonseca, B., Morgado, L., & Martins, P. (2009). Using Second Life for Problem Based Learning in Computer Science Programming. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v2i1.419
Girvan, C., Tangney, B., & Savage, T. (2013). SLurtles: Supporting constructionist learning in Second Life. Computers & Education, 61, 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.005
Gomes, A., & Mendes, A. J. N. (2007). Learning to program-difficulties and solutions. International Conference on Engineering Education, 1–5. Retrieved from http://ineer.org/Events/ICEE2007/papers/411.pdf
Guzdial, M. (2004). Programming Environments for Novices. In S. Fincher & M. Petre (Eds.), Computer Science Education Research (pp. 127–154). Lisse, The Netherlands: Taylor &Francis.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8535.2008.00900.x
Hulsey, C., Pence, T. B., & Hodges, L. F. (2014). Camp CyberGirls: Using a Virtual World to Introduce Computing Concepts to Middle School Girls. Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE ’14, 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538881
Kafai, Y., & Burke, Q. (2014). Connected code : why children need to learn programming. MIT Press.
Kelleher, C., & Pausch, R. (2005). Lowering the Barriers to Programming : a survey of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Computing Surveys, 37(2), 83–137. https://doi.org/10.1145/1089733.1089734
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Messinger, P. R., Stroulia, E., Lyons, K., Bone, M., Niu, R. H., Smirnov, K., & Perelgut, S. (2009). Virtual worlds — past, present, and future: New directions in social computing. Decision Support Systems, 47(3), 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.014
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Neale, P., Thapa, S., & Boyce, C. (2006). Preparing a case study : A guide for designing and conducting a case study for evaluation input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, (May), 1–12.
Papert, S. (n.d.). Hard fun. Retrieved December 1, 2017, from http://www.papert.org/articles/HardFun.html
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. In Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. [BOOK]. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pellas, N. (2014). The development of a virtual learning platform for teaching concurrent program- ming languages in Secondary education: The use of Open Sim and Scratch4OS. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 10(1), 129–143.
Pellas, N., & Kazanidis, I. (2014). Online and hybrid university-level courses with the utilization of Second Life: Investigating the factors that predict student choice in Second Life supported online and hybrid university-level courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.047
Pellas, N., & Peroutseas, E. (2016). Gaming in Second Life via Scratch4SL:Engaging High School Students in Programming Courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(1), 108–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115612785
Pellas, N., & Vosinakis, S. (2017). How can a simulation game support the development of computational problem- solving strategies ? IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON 2017), (May). Athens: Greece.
Rico, M., Martínez-Muñoz, G., Alaman, X., Camacho, D., & Pulido, E. (2011). A programming experience of high school students in a virtual world platform. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(1), 1–9.
Rosenbaum, E. (2008). Scratch for Second Life. In S. V. Harrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Sciences – ICLS 2008 (pp. 383–391). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1600042
Sajjanhar, A., & Faulkner, J. (2014). Exploring second life as a learning environment for computer programming. Creative Education, 5(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.51010
Sauppé, A., Szafir, D., Huang, C.-M., & Mutlu, B. (2015). From 9 to 90: Engaging Learners of All Ages. Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE ’15, 575–580. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677248
Seng, K. L. J., & Edirisinghe, E. M. N. S. (2007). Teaching computer science using Second Life as a learning environment. Ascilite, (14), 583–586.
Chou, S & Liu, C. (2005). Learning Effectiveness in Web-Based Technology-Mediated Virtual Learning Environment. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.385
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., Vol. 3rd, pp. 443–466). Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip053/2004026085.html
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
Woodside, A. G. (2010). Case study research: Theory, methods, practice. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392599
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Fourth Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.