THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ PERCEIVED IMPORTANCE OF ONLINE TEACHING COMPETENCIES AND THEIR SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ PERCEIVED IMPORTANCE OF ONLINE TEACHING COMPETENCIES AND THEIR SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS

Online teaching caught in-service teachers off-guard with emergency distance education and sparked interest to teacher education programs. Purpose of this study is to explore self-efficacy beliefs of prospective teachers in teaching online (SETO) and to determine the relationship between pre-service teachers’ importance of online teaching competencies (IOTC) perceptions and their SETO beliefs. 101 pre-service teachers were asked to fill faculty readiness to teach online scale and the responses were analyzed through ANOVA and Pearson Correlation. The results showed a significant difference between pre-service teachers’ majors, exposure to ICT-related experiences, and their SETO beliefs. In addition, there is a significant relationship between pre-service teachers’ IOCT perceptions and SETO beliefs. Understanding the existing SETO beliefs of pre-service teachers is critical because it provides evidence to reassess how pre-service teachers are supported to build their online teaching competencies. The results are expected to make a significant contribution to research on establishing online teaching competencies in Turkiye and assisting teachers in understanding the value of those competencies; as a result, potential implementers may have stronger online teaching self-efficacy in their distance classrooms. The study suggests incorporating technology-based resources into teacher education courses within a digital pedagogy competencies framework to increase preservice teachers’ self-efficacy.

___

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States: Newburyport.
  • Aytaç, T. (2021). The Problems Faced by Teachers in Turkey during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Their Opinions. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(1), 404-420.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
  • Başer, D. (2021). An Investıgatıon Of Self-Effıcacy And Perceıved Benefıt Belıefs Regardıng Dıstance Educatıon Of Preservıce Teachers As Future Implementers. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(4), 1145-1158.
  • Berkant, H. (2016). Faculty Of Education Students Computer Self Efficacy Beliefs And Their Attitudes Towards Computers And Implementing Computer Supported Education. European Journal Of Contemporary Education, 15(1).
  • Birisci, S., & Emin, K. U. L. (2019). Predictors of technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 75-93.
  • Brown, G. T. (2020). Schooling beyond COVID-19: an unevenly distributed future. Frontiers in Education, 5:82.
  • Bruder, I. (1989). Distance Learning: What's Holding Back This Boundless Delivery System. Electronic learning, 8(6), 30-35.
  • Caka, C. (2021). Investigation of the relationship between pre-service teachers’ technologies self-efficacy perceptions, attitudes towards the use of distance education environments, and academic procrastination tendencies. International Technology and Education Journal, 5(2), 21-31.
  • Caner, M., & Aydin, S. (2021). Self efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers on technology integration. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 79-94.
  • Carretero Gomez, S., Napierala, J., Bessios, A., Mägi, E., Pugacewicz, A., Ranieri, M., Triquet, K., Lombaerts, K., Robledo Bottcher, N., Montanari, M., & Gonzalez Vazquez, I. (2021). What did we learn from schooling practices during the COVID-19 lockdown. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Chukwuemeka, E. J., Nsofor, C. C., Falode, O. C., & Aniah, A. (2019). Assessing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy towards technology integration in Colleges of Education in South-west Nigeria.
  • Coldeway, D. O. (1988). Methodological issues in distance educational research. American Journal of Distance Education, 2(3), 45-54.
  • Cooper, R., Warren, L., Hogan-Chapman, A., & Mills, L. (2020). Pre-service teachers and their self-efficacy toward online teaching. SRATE Journal, 29(2).
  • Corcuera, L., & Alvarez Jr, A. (2021). From face-to-face to teaching at a distance: Lessons learned from emergency remote teaching. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2).
  • David A. Martin, Natalie McMaster & Michael D. Carey (2020). Course design features influencing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in their ability to support students’ use of ICT, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36:4, 221-236.
  • ERG. (2020). Eğitim İzleme Raporu 2020: Öğretmenler. Sabancı Üniversitesi: Eğitim Gözlemevi European Communities. (2007). Key competences for lifelong learning: European Reference Framework, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
  • Facer, K., & Selwyn, N. (2021). Digital Technology and the Futures of Education: Towards ‘Non-Stupid’Optimism. UNESCO: Futures of Education Report.
  • Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449-2472.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ghomi, M., & Redecker, C. (2019). Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu): Development and Evaluation of a Self-assessment Instrument for Teachers' Digital Competence. International Conference on Computer Supported Education (1)541-548.
  • Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competences for online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 65–72.
  • Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2016). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Boston, USA: Cengage Learning.
  • Greta Björk Gudmundsdottir & Ove Edvard Hatlevik (2018) Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education, European Journal of Teacher Education, 41:2, 214-231.
  • Hassan, M. M., Mirza, T., & Hussain, M. W. (2020). A critical review by teachers on the online teaching-learning during the COVID-19. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 10(8), 17-27.
  • Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and information technologies, 21(3), 655-679.
  • Izhar, N. A., Al-dheleai, Y. M., & Na, K. S. (2021). Teaching in the Time of Covid-19: The Challenges Faced By Teachers in Initiating Online Class Sessions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(2), 1294-1306.
  • Karatas, I., Tunc, M. P., Yilmaz, N., & Karaci, G. (2017). An investigation of technological pedagogical content knowledge, self-confidence, and perception of pre-service middle school mathematics teachers towards instructional technologies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 122-132.
  • Keser, H., YILMAZ, F. G. K., & Yilmaz, R. (2015). TPACK Competencies And Technology İntegration Self-Efficacy Perceptions Of Pre-Service Teachers. İlköğretim Online, 14(4), 1193-1207.
  • Kim, S. W., & Lee, Y. (2018). The Effect of Programming-based TPACK Education Program on Self-efficacy Beliefs about Technology Integration of Pre-service Teachers. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 422-426). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  • Marek, M. W., Chew, C. S., & Wu, W. C. V. (2021). Teacher experiences in converting classes to distance learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 19(1), 89-109.
  • Martin, F., Budhrani, K., & Wang, C. (2019). Examining faculty perception of their readiness to teach online. Online Learning, 23(3), 97-119.
  • Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (2020). Öğretmenlerde Dijital Okuryazarlık Kılavuzu.
  • Ministry of National Education Republic of Turkey (2017). General Competencies for Teaching Profession. Directorate General for Teacher Training and Development.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD skills outlook 2019: Thriving in a digital world. Paris, France: OECD.
  • Pregowska, A., Masztalerz, K., Garlińska, M., & Osial, M. (2021). A worldwide journey through distance education—from the post office to virtual, augmented and mixed realities, and education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(3), 118.
  • Schleicher, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on education: Insights from education at a glance 2020. OECD 2020. Shelton, K., & Saltsman, G. (2005). An administrator's guide to online education. Greenwich, CT: IAP-Information Age Pub.
  • Simonson, M., Zvacek, S. M., & Smaldino, S. (2019). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. North Carolina: Information Age Pub.
  • Song, L. (2018). Improving Pre-Service Teachers’self-Efficacy On Technology Integration Through Service Learning. The Canadian Journal Of Action Research, 19(1), 22-32.
  • TEDMEM. (2020). COVID-19 sürecinde eğitim: Uzaktan öğrenme, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri: TEDMEM Analiz Dizisi. Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği Yayınları.
  • Tekinarslan, E. (2011). Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Çevrimiçi Teknolojilere Yönelik Öz-Yeterlik Algilari. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(37), 120-134.
  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144.
  • Topkaya, E. Z. (2010). Pre-Service English Language Teachers' Perceptions of Computer Self-Efficacy and General Self-Efficacy. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(1), 143-156.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001) Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
  • Tuncer, M., & Tanaş, R. (2011). Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayar Öz-Yeterlik Algılarının Değerlendirilmesi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (6), 222-232.
  • Unal, E. (2013). An examination of the relationship between preservice teachers’ perceptions of technology integration self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge competencies (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara.
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2019). Building Digital Competencies to Benefit from Frontier Technologies, United Nations, New York.
  • Van Ooyik, J., Lerner, J., & Pitts, R. T. (2021). The Development of Preservice Teaching Competencies. Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 32(1), 8-12.
  • Varvel, V. E. (2007). Master online teacher competencies. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(1), 1–41. Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231-250.
  • Yastibas, A. E. (2021). Preparing Pre-Service English Language Teachers to Teach at Unprecedented Times: The Case of Turkey. Journal of English Teaching, 7(1), 1-14.
  • Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-6488
  • Başlangıç: 2000
  • Yayıncı: Anadolu Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ PERCEIVED IMPORTANCE OF ONLINE TEACHING COMPETENCIES AND THEIR SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS

Elif OZTURK, Zeynep TURGUT

THE INSTRUCTOR PARAMETERS OF TRANSITION TO FULLY ONLINE LEARNING

Hale ILGAZ, Denizer YILDIRIM, Nevzat OZEL, Salih DEMIR, Mesut SEVINDIK

DIGITAL DIVIDE AND EMERGENCY REMOTE EDUCATION: RECONSIDERING THE USE OF EDUCATIONAL RADIO DURING THE PANDEMIC

Burcin YERSEL, Basak KALKAN, Fikret ER, Arzu Celen OZER, Aysel Ulukan KORUL

FACTORS AFFECTING TEACHERS’ ONLINE LEARNING EXPERIENCES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING

Lastika Ary PRIHANDOKO

CRITERIA FOR DESIGNING AND EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF VIRTUAL CLASSROOMS DURING EMERGENCY LEARNING

Mohammed Kamal AFIFY, Abdulrazak Mohamed ALQOOT, Saffanah Abdel Kader ZEDAN

EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS

Manuel MEDINA-LABRADOR, Gustavo Rene GARCIA-VARGAS, Fernando MARROQUIN-CIENDUA

PROGRAM EVALUATION IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: THE CASE OF OPEN EDUCATION SYSTEM CALL CENTER SERVICES ASSOCIATE DEGREE PROGRAM

Yagmur TUC, Nejdet KARADAG

EXAMINATION OF THE PREDICTION OF FLEXIBILITY FOR LEARNER SATISFACTION IN ONLINE COURSES

Arif AKCAY

DIALOGIC-INTERACTIVE MEDIA IN ONLINE LEARNING: EFFECTIVENESS IN SPEAKING SKILLS

Atmazaki ATMAZAKI, Syahrul RAMADHAN, Vivi INDRIYANI

THE IMPACT OF INQUIRY-BASED ONLINE LEARNING WITH VIRTUAL LABORATORIES ON STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILLS

Ahmad Fauzi HENDRATMOKO, Madlazim MADLAZIM, Wahono WIDODO, I Gusti Made SANJAYA