EXAMINING ONLINE DESIGN STUDIO COURSE EXPERIENCES OF STUDENTS, ACADEMIC SUPERVISORS AND COMPANY MENTORS IN INDUSTRIAL DESIGN PROGRAM

EXAMINING ONLINE DESIGN STUDIO COURSE EXPERIENCES OF STUDENTS, ACADEMIC SUPERVISORS AND COMPANY MENTORS IN INDUSTRIAL DESIGN PROGRAM

The aim of this study is to share the experiences and the collaborations carried out within the sector during the pandemic period, in a graduation project which is focused on university-industry cooperation - in order to make the role of the designer in the sector more effective, to transform education into a comprehensive sectoral experience for students and to offer the sector the experience of working with the designer at Department of Industrial Design, Eskisehir Technical University. The method of the research is a case study examining by designing it with a holistic single-case design since it is a single, representative, and typical case. In the case study, the research group consists of the students who were enrolled in the 2019-2020 spring term graduation project course, academic supervisors and company mentors at Eskisehir Technical University, Turkiye. The result of the study is that pandemic opened the door to new educational experiences for design academics, students and companies. This sharp bend mainly affected the implementation processes of oneon- one lessons, just like the design studio, which we define as the heart of design education. It has also paved the way for different online interactive educational tools and platforms to be used for the educational components of the design of the process.

___

  • Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Sa´nchez Garcı´a, J. L. and Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E. (2015) ‘UniversityIndustry Partnerships for the Provision of R&D Services’, Journal of Business Research, 68/7: 1407–13. Elsevier Inc.
  • Boud, D. and G. Feletti, The challenge of problem-based learning. 2013: Routledge. Brown, J. B. (2020) ‘From denial to acceptance: a turning point for design studio in architecture education’, Distance Design Education [Online]. Available at https://distancedesigneducation.com/2020/05/11/from-denial-to-acceptance-a-turning-point-for-design-studio-in-architecture-education/ (Accessed 10 December 2020).
  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of applied psychology, 78(1), 98
  • Etzkowitz, H. (1983) ‘Entrepreneurial Scientists and Entrepreneurial Universities in American Academic Science’, Minerva, 21/2–3: 198–233.
  • Green, J. K., Burrow, M. S. and Carvalho, L. (2020) ‘Designing for Transition: Supporting Teachers and Students Cope with Emergency Remote Education’, Postdigital Science and Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 906–922 [Online]. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-020-00185-6.
  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. and Bond, A. (2020) The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning [Online]. Available at https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (Accessed 15 December 2020).
  • Jones, D. (2020) ‘Creating Distance Design Courses’, [Online]. Available at https://distancedesigneducation.com/creating-distance-design-courses/.
  • Lackney, J. (1999). A history of the studio-based learning model. Retrieved on 8 March 2012 fromhttps://www.google.com.tr/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=i2InVpGwFq6z8wfH6J IDQ&gws_rd=ssl#q= a+history+of+the+studio-based+learning+model
  • Meyer, M.J., Norman, D. (2020) Changing Design Education for the 21st Century, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13-49
  • Marshalsey, L. and Sclater, M. (2020) ‘Together but Apart: Creating and Supporting Online Learning Communities in an Era of Distributed Studio Education’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, vol. n/a, no. n/a [Online]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12331 (Accessed 15 December 2020).
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  • Yocom, K., Proksch, G., Born, B., & Tyman, S. K. (2012). The built environments laboratory: An Interdisciplinary framework for studio education in the planning and design disciplines. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 7(2), 8-25.
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-6488
  • Başlangıç: 2000
  • Yayıncı: Anadolu Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ INDULGENCE IN SIX SHARP PRACTICES: GENERAL LINEAR MODELLING OF PREDICTIVE PARAMETERS

Valentine Joseph OWAN, Onyinye CHUKTU, Ann E. DIJEH, Abderrazak ZAAFOUR, Julius U. UKAH, Margaret U. CHUKWURAH, Denis A. UBE, Michael E. ASUQUO, Esuong U. UWASE, Udida J. UDIDA, Cyprian O. OJONG

THE EFFECTS OF STRATEGY TRAINING ON THE USE OF GLOBAL READING STRATEGIES: IMPLICATIONS FROM THINK-ALOUD AND EYE-TRACKING DATA

Ozlem UTKU BILICI, Gonca SUBASI, Emrah DOLGUNSOZ

DISRUPTIVE CHANGE AND LEARNING INNOVATIONS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR UNIVERSITAS TERBUKA

Ojat DAROJAT, Olivia IDRUS, Lidwina Sri ARDIASIH

PROFESSIONAL LEARNING NETWORK ACTIVITIES OF INDONESIAN TEACHERS: DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING ANALYSIS OF TEACHERS’ BACKGROUNDS

Wawan KRISMANTO, Punaji SETYOSARI, Dedi KUSWANDI, Henry PRAHERDHIONO

BLENDED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Mustafa Tevfik HEBEBCI, Nilay OZER

SYNCHRONOUS VIRTUAL LEARNING STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCE AND THE PROSPECT IN VIETNAM

Mai Thi Truc LE, Khue Van TRAN

THE BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE AUGMENTED REALITY RESEARCH CARRIED OUT WITH THE EXPERIMENTAL METHOD PUBLISHED IN SCOPUS BETWEEN 2012-2022

Hakan ALTINPULLUK, Yusuf YILDIRIM

EXAMINING ONLINE DESIGN STUDIO COURSE EXPERIENCES OF STUDENTS, ACADEMIC SUPERVISORS AND COMPANY MENTORS IN INDUSTRIAL DESIGN PROGRAM

Nilgun OZDAMAR, Fusun CURAOGLU, Emre TUFEKCIOGLU, Duysal TUTUNCU DEMIRBAS

IMPACT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT ON STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT AND LEARNING OUTCOMES

Cao Tuong DINH