Effect of land cover on biodiversity and composition of a soil macrofauna community in a reclaimed coastal area at Yancheng, China
Reclamation was considered the primary factor that caused coastal wetland loss in China. Along with land conversion, there were different types of land cover on the reclaimed coast. In early March 2012, we selected 5 habitats with different land cover from a reclaimed coastal area at Yancheng City that was diked about 30 years before, and the biodiversity and composition variations in soil macrofauna communities were studied. We found that higher biodiversity values appeared in the uncultivated land, the poplar forest, and the metasequoia forest, while lower values occurred in the wheat farm and bulrush land. By multivariate statistical analysis, significant differences in comparisons of soil macrofauna communities were detected, except for in the comparison between the poplar forest and the metasequoia forest. Our findings indicated that the biodiversity of macrofauna was significantly affected by habitat characters and the vegetation cover was strongly related to soil macrofauna distribution patterns and community composition in the reclaimed coastal area.
Effect of land cover on biodiversity and composition of a soil macrofauna community in a reclaimed coastal area at Yancheng, China
Reclamation was considered the primary factor that caused coastal wetland loss in China. Along with land conversion, there were different types of land cover on the reclaimed coast. In early March 2012, we selected 5 habitats with different land cover from a reclaimed coastal area at Yancheng City that was diked about 30 years before, and the biodiversity and composition variations in soil macrofauna communities were studied. We found that higher biodiversity values appeared in the uncultivated land, the poplar forest, and the metasequoia forest, while lower values occurred in the wheat farm and bulrush land. By multivariate statistical analysis, significant differences in comparisons of soil macrofauna communities were detected, except for in the comparison between the poplar forest and the metasequoia forest. Our findings indicated that the biodiversity of macrofauna was significantly affected by habitat characters and the vegetation cover was strongly related to soil macrofauna distribution patterns and community composition in the reclaimed coastal area.
___
- An S, Li H, Guan B, Zhou C, Wang Z, Deng Z, Zhi Y, Liu Y, Xu C, Fang S et al. (2007). China’s natural wetlands: past problems, current status, and future challenges. Ambio 36: 335–342.
- Azul AM, Mendes SM, Sousa JP, Freitas H (2011). Fungal fruitbodies and soil macrofauna as indicators of land use practices on soil biodiversity in Montado. Agroforest Syst 82: 121–138.
- Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P (2008). Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. Forest Ecol Manag 254: 1–15.
- Barrios E, Cobo JG, Rao IM, Thomas RJ, Amezquita E, Jimenez JJ, Rondon MA (2005). Fallow management for soil fertility recovery in tropical Andean agroecosystems in Colombia. Agr Ecosyst Environ 110: 29–42.
- Barros E, Pashanasi B, Constantino R, Lavelle P (2002). Effects of land-use system on the soil macrofauna in western Brazilian Amazonia. Biol Fert Soils 35: 338–347.
- Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009a). Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Appl Geogr 29: 390–401.
- Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009b). Using remote sensing and GIS to detect and monitor land use and land cover change in Dhaka Metropolitan of Bangladesh during 1960-2005. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 150: 237–249.
- Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y, Rahman MZ (2012). Dynamics of land use/cover changes and the analysis of landscape fragmentation in Dhaka Metropoltian, Bangladesh. GeoJoornal 77: 315–330.
- Drummond MA, Loveland TR (2010). Land-use pressure and a transition to forest-cover loss in the eastern United States. Bioscience 60: 286–298.
- Duke NC, Meynecke JO, Dittmann S, Ellison AM, Anger K, Berger U, Cannicci S, Diele K, Ewel KC, Field CD et al. (2007). A world without mangroves? Science 317: 41–42.
- Etter A, McAlpine C, Pullar D, Possingham H (2006). Modelling the conversion of Colombian lowland ecosystems since 1940: Drivers, patterns and rates. J Environ Manage 79: 74–87.
- Fernández S, Santín C, Marquínez J, Álvarez MA (2010). Saltmarsh soil evolution after land reclamation in Atlantic estuaries (Bay of Biscay, North coast of Spain). Geomorphology 114: 497–507.
- Ge BM, Li ZX, Zhang DZ, Zhang HB, Liu ZT, Zhou CL, Tang BP (2012). Communities of soil macrofauna in green spaces of an urbanizing city at east China. Rev Chil Hist Nat 85: 219–226.
- Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001). PAST: Paleoontological statistical software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 1–9.
- Huston MA (2005). The three phases of land-use change: implications for biodiversity. Ecol Appl 15: 1864–1878.
- Margalef DR (1957). Information theory in ecology. Gen Syst 3: 36–
- Martínez ML, Pérez-Maqueo O, Vázquez G, Castillo-Campos G, García-Franco J, Mehltreter K, Landgrave R (2009). Effects of land use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in tropical montane cloud forests of Mexico. Forest Ecol Manag 258: 1856–1863.
- Mora C, Sale PF (2011). Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 434: 251–266.
- Paoletti MG, D’incà A, Tonin E, Tonon S, Migliorini C, Petruzzelli G, Pezzarossa B, Gomiero T, Sommaggio D (2009). Soil invertebrates as bio-indicators in a natural area converted from agricultural use: the case study of Vallevecchia-Lugugnana in north-eastern Italy. J Sustain Agr 34: 38–56.
- Paterson DM, Hanley M, Black K, Defew EC, Solan M (2011). Science and policy mismatch in coastal zone ecosystem management. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 434: 201–202.
- Pauli N, Barrios E, Conacher AJ, Oberthür T (2011). Soil macrofauna in agricultural landscapes dominated by the quesungual lashand-mulch agroforestry system, western Honduras. Appl Soil Ecol 47: 119–132.
- Reidsma P, Tekelenburg T, Van den Berg M, Alkemade R (2006). Impacts of land-use change on biodiversity: an assessment of agricultural biodiversity in the European Union. Agr Ecosyst Environ 114: 86–102.
- Schöll K, Devetter M (2013). Soil rotifers new to Hungary from the Gemenc floodplain (Duna-Dráva National Park, Hungary). Turk J Zool 37: 406–412.
- Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
- Smith J, Chapman A, Eggleton P (2006). Baseline biodiversity surveys of the soil macrofauna of London’s green spaces. Urban Ecosystems 9: 337–349.
- Tasser E, Tappeiner U (2002). Impact of land use changes on mountain vegetation. Appl Veg Sci 5: 173–184.
- Wang J, Chen Y, Shao X, Zhang Y, Cao Y (2012). Land-use changes and policy dimension driving forces in China: present, trend and future. Land Use Policy 29: 737–749.
- Wolanski E (2007). Estuarine Ecohydrology. Elsevier: Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Wu J, Fu C, Lu F, Chen J (2005). Changes in free-living nematode community structure in relation to progressive land reclamation at an intertidal marsh. Appl Soil Ecol 29: 47–58.