Allometry of head size and shape dimorphism in the grass snake (Natrix natrix L.)

This study was conducted to investigate allometry of head growth patterns in the grass snake (Natrix natrix (Linnaeus, 1758)). Although male and female grass snakes differ in relative head size, their head growth patterns follow similar trajectories. The sexual differences are roughly constant during ontogeny. Most head dimensions grow with negative allometry or isometry with respect to the snout?vent length except head width, which grows with positive allometry in both sexes.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Allometry, morphology, Natricinae, Natrix, sexual shape dimorphism

Allometry of head size and shape dimorphism in the grass snake (Natrix natrix L.)

Keywords:

Allometry, morphology, Natricinae, Natrix, sexual shape dimorphism,

PDF

___

Arnold SJ (1993). Foraging theory and prey-size-predator-size relations in snakes. In: Seigel RA, Collins JT, editors. Snakes: Ecology and Behavior. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, pp. 87–115.
Baier F, Wiedl HJ (2010). The re-evaluated conservation status of the mountain populations of the highly endangered Cyprus grass snake, Natrix natrix cypriaca (Hecht, 1930), with miscellaneous natural history notes. Salamandra 46: 16–23.
Bohonak A (2004). RMA. Software for Reduced Major Axis Regression. San Diego, CA, USA: San Diego State University.
Bonnet X, Shine R, Naulleau G, Vacher-Vallas M (1998). Sexual dimorphism in snakes: different reproductive roles favour different body plans. Proc R Soc Lond B 265: 179–183.
Borczyk B (2007). The causes of intraspecific variation in sexual dimorphism in the common grass snake populations, Natrix natrix Linnaeus, 1758 (Serpentes, Colubridae): data from southwestern Poland. Acta Zool Crac 50A: 9–13.
Camilleri C, Shine R (1990). Sexual dimorphism and dietary divergence: differences in trophic morphology between male and female snakes. Copeia 1990: 649–658.
Cundall D, Greene HW (2000). Feeding in snakes. In: Schwenk K, editor. Feeding: Form, and Evolution in Tetrapod Vertebrates. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, pp. 293–333.
Elgee K, Blouin-Demers G (2011). Eastern garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) with proportionally larger heads are in better condition. Amphibia-Reptilia 32: 424–427.
Feriche M, Pleguezuelos JM, Cerro A (1993). Sexual dimorphism and sexing of Mediterranean colubrids based on external characteristics. J Herpetol 27: 357–362.
Filippi E, Capula M, Luiselli L, Agrimi U (1996). The prey spectrum of Natrix natrix (Linnaeus, 1758) and Natrix tesselata (Laurenti, 1768) in sympatric populations (Squamata: Serpentes: Colubridae). Herpetozoa 8: 155–164.
Forsman A (1991). Adaptive variation in head size in Vipera berus L. populations. Biol J Linn Soc 43: 281–296.
Gregory PT (2004). Sexual dimorphism and allometric size variation in a population of grass snakes (Natrix natrix) in southern England. J Herpetol 38: 231–240.
Gregory PT, Isaac LA (2004). Food habits of the grass snake in southeastern England: is Natrix natrix a generalist predator? J Herpetol 38: 88–95.
Herrel A, De Grauw E, Lemos-Espinal JA (2001). Head shape and bite performance in xenosaurid lizards. J Exp Zool 290: 101– 107.
Jayne BC, Voris HK, Ng PKL (2002). Snake circumvents constraints on prey size. Nature 418: 143.
Kabisch K (1999). Natrix natrix (Linnaeus, 1758) –Ringelnatter. In: Böhme W, editor. Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, Vol. 3/Schlangen II. Wiesbaden, Germany: AULA- Verlag, pp. 513–580 (in German).
King R (2002). Predicted and observed maximum prey size - snake size allometry. Funct Ecol 16: 766–772.
King RB, Bittner TD, Queral-Regil A, Cline JH (1999). Sexual dimorphism in neonate and adult snakes. J Zool (Lond) 247: 19–28.
Kminiak M, Kaluz S (1983). Evaluation of sexual dimorphism in snakes (Ophidia, Squamata) based on external morphological characters. Folia Zool 32: 259–270.
Lappin AK, Hamilton PS, Sullivan B (2006). Bite-force performance and head shape in a sexually dimorphic crevice-dwelling lizard, the common chuckwalla [Sauromalus ater (= obesus)]. Biol J Linn Soc 88: 215–222.
Luiselli L, Akani GC, Corti C, Angelini FM (2002). Is sexual size dimorphism in relative head size correlated with intersexual dietary divergence in West African forest cobras, Naja melanoleuca? Contr Zool 71: 141–145.
Luiselli L, Capula M, Shine R (1997). Food habits, growth rates, and reproductive biology of grass snakes, Natrix natrix (Colubridae) in the Italian Alps. J Zool (Lond) 241: 371–380.
Madsen T (1983). Growth rates, maturation and sexual size dimorphism in a population of grass snakes, Natrix natrix, in southern Sweden. Oikos 40: 277–282.
Madsen T, Shine R (1993). Phenotypic plasticity in body size and sexual size dimorphism in European grass snake. Evolution 47: 321–325.
McBrayer LD (2004). The relationship between skull morphology, biting performance and foraging mode in Kalahari lacertid lizards. Zool J Linn Soc 140: 403–416.
Mebert K (1996). Comparaison morphologique entre des populations introduites et indigènes de Natrix tessellata de l’Arc Alpin. Bull Soc Herp France 80: 15–25 (in French).
Mebert K (2011). Sexual dimorphism in the dice snake (Natrix tessellata) from the Central Alps. Mertensiella 18: 94–99.
Mertens D (1995). Population structure and abundance of grass snakes, Natrix natrix, in Central Germany. J Herpetol 29: 454–456.
Mertens R (1947). Studien zur Eidonomie und Taxonomie der Ringelnatter (Natrix natrix). Abh Seckenberg Naturi Ges 476: 1–30 (in German).
Najbar B, Borczyk B (2012). Zaskroniec Zwyczajny. Biologia i Ochrona. Zielona Góra, Poland: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego (in Polish).
Pough HF, Groves JD (1983). Specialization of the body form and food habits of snakes. Am Zool 23: 443–454.
Shine R (1986). Sexual differences in morphology and niche utilization in an aquatic snake, Acrochordus arafurae. Oecologia 69: 260–267.
Shine R (1991). Intersexual dietary divergence and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in snakes. Am Nat 138: 103–122.
Shine R (1993). Sexual dimorphism in snakes. In: Seigel, RA and Collins JT, editors. Snakes: Ecology and Behavior. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, pp. 49–86.
Shine R (1994). Sexual size dimorphism in snakes revisited. Copeia 1994: 326–346.
Shylakhtin GV, Tabachishin VG, Zavialov EV (2005). Nutrition ecology of grass snake (Natrix natrix) in the north of the Lower Volga region. Mod Herpetol 2005: 111–116.
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995). Biometry: Principles and Practices of Statistics in Biological Research. New York, NY, USA: W. H. Freeman.
Thorpe RS (1979). Multivariate analysis of the population systematics of the ringed snake, Natrix natrix (L). Proc Roy Soc Edin 78B: 1–62.
Thorpe RS (1989). Pattern and function of sexual dimorphism: a biometric study of character variation in the grass snake (Natrix natrix, Colubridae) due to sex and its interaction with geography. Copeia 1989: 53–63.
Vincent SE, Herrel A (2007). Functional and ecological correlates of ecologically-based dimorphism in squamate reptiles. Int Comp Biol 47: 172–188.
Vincent SE, Herrel A, Irschick DJ (2004a). Ontogeny of intersexual head shape and prey selection in the pitviper Agkistrodon piscivorous. Biol J Linn Soc 81: 151–159.
Vincent SE, Herrel A, Irschick DJ (2004b). Sexual dimorphism in head shape and diet in the cottonmouth snake (Agkistrodon piscivorous). J Zool (Lond) 264: 53–59.