The Effects of Planting Time and Combination on the Nutrient Composition and Digestible Dry Matter Yield of Four Mixtures of Vetch Varieties Intercropped with Barley
The aim of this study was to determine the chemical composition, digestibility, energy content, and digestible dry matter yield of 4 mixtures of different vetch varieties intercropped with the same barley at 3 different planting times under Eastern Anatolian conditions. Four different vetch species, i.e. common (Farukbey-2001), Hungarian (Tarım Beyazı-98), hairy (Selçuklu-2002), and wooly pod (Segmen-2002), intercropped with barley (Tokak-157) were utilized. The mixtures of vetches intercropped with barley were planted on 7 October 2003 (I), 7 November 2003 (II), and 10 April 2004 (III), and each variety/planting time was randomly assigned to 3 replications. The mixtures of vetches intercropped with barley were harvested by hand using clippers when the barley started spiking and vetches were at 1/4 flowering. All samples were analyzed for dry matter (DM), ash, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) content. In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) of the samples was also determined. While DM and organic matter (OM) content did not differ, CP, NDF, and ADF content were significantly different among the different mixtures of vetch intercropped with barley (P < 0.05). IVDMD, metabolizable energy (ME), and net energy lactation (NEL) values were also significantly different among the mixtures of vetch intercropped with barley (P < 0.05). Digestible DM and ME yield of the mixtures were significantly affected by planting time (P < 0.05), but not variety. However, CP yield of the vetch-barley mixtures was significantly affected by both planting time and variety (P < 0.05). It can be concluded that all of the mixtures of vetch intercropped with barley had significantly higher digestible DM and CP yield when planted on 7 October 2003. Thus, October should be preferred for planting of the mixtures of vetch intercropped with barley in Eastern Anatolia. If a greater CP yield in addition to digestible DM yield is desired from vetch-barley hay, then common vetch should not be the choice.
The Effects of Planting Time and Combination on the Nutrient Composition and Digestible Dry Matter Yield of Four Mixtures of Vetch Varieties Intercropped with Barley
The aim of this study was to determine the chemical composition, digestibility, energy content, and digestible dry matter yield of 4 mixtures of different vetch varieties intercropped with the same barley at 3 different planting times under Eastern Anatolian conditions. Four different vetch species, i.e. common (Farukbey-2001), Hungarian (Tarım Beyazı-98), hairy (Selçuklu-2002), and wooly pod (Segmen-2002), intercropped with barley (Tokak-157) were utilized. The mixtures of vetches intercropped with barley were planted on 7 October 2003 (I), 7 November 2003 (II), and 10 April 2004 (III), and each variety/planting time was randomly assigned to 3 replications. The mixtures of vetches intercropped with barley were harvested by hand using clippers when the barley started spiking and vetches were at 1/4 flowering. All samples were analyzed for dry matter (DM), ash, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) content. In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) of the samples was also determined. While DM and organic matter (OM) content did not differ, CP, NDF, and ADF content were significantly different among the different mixtures of vetch intercropped with barley (P < 0.05). IVDMD, metabolizable energy (ME), and net energy lactation (NEL) values were also significantly different among the mixtures of vetch intercropped with barley (P < 0.05). Digestible DM and ME yield of the mixtures were significantly affected by planting time (P < 0.05), but not variety. However, CP yield of the vetch-barley mixtures was significantly affected by both planting time and variety (P < 0.05). It can be concluded that all of the mixtures of vetch intercropped with barley had significantly higher digestible DM and CP yield when planted on 7 October 2003. Thus, October should be preferred for planting of the mixtures of vetch intercropped with barley in Eastern Anatolia. If a greater CP yield in addition to digestible DM yield is desired from vetch-barley hay, then common vetch should not be the choice.
___
- Goering, H.K., Van Soest, P.J.: Forage Fiber Analyses. Apparatus, Reagent, Procedures and Applications. USDA Agric. Handbook No. 379. 1970.
- Tilley, J.M.A., Terry, R.A.: A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci., 1963; 18: 104-111.
- Marten, G.C., Barnes, R.F.: Prediction of energy digestibility of forages with in vitro rumen fermentation and fungal enzyme systems. In: W.J. Pigden, C.C. Balch, and M. Graham, Eds. Proc. Int. Workshop on Standardization of Analytical Methodology for Feed. Int. Dev. Res. Center, Ottawa, Canada. 1980; 61-71.
- NRC: Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (7thEd.), National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 1996.
- Weiss, W.P., Conrad, H.R., St. Pierre, N.R.: A theoretically-based model for predicting total digestible nutrient values of forages and concentrates. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 1992; 39: 95-110.
- SAS: User’s Guide Statistics, Version 5 ed. SAS inst., Inc., Cary, NC. 1985.
- Smith, B.W.: Feed Industry Red Book. Communications Marketing, Inc., MN. 1990.
- Deniz, S., Nursoy, H., Yılmaz, İ., Karslı, M.A.: Vejetasyonun farklı devrelerinde hasat edilmenin bazı mısır varyetelerinde besin madde içeriği ve silaj kalitesi ile sindirilebilir kuru madde miktarına etkisi. S. Ü. Vet. Bil. Derg., 2001; 17: 43-49.
- Keskin, B., Yılmaz, İ.H., Karslı, M.A., Nursoy, H.: Effects of urea or urea plus molasses supplementation to silages with different sorghum varieties harvested at the milk stage on the quality and in vitro dry matter digestibility of silages. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 2005; 29: 1143-1147.
- Karslı, M.A., Akdeniz, H., Levendoğlu, T., Terzioğlu, Ö.: Evaluation of the nutrient content and protein fractions of four different common vetch varieties. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 2005; 29: 1291-1297.
- Altınok, S., Hakyemez H. B.: Ankara koşullarında tüylü fiğ ve koca fiğin arpa ile karışımlarında farklı karışım oranlarının yem verimine etkileri. Ankara Tarım Bil. Der., 2002; 8: 45-50.
- Karadağ, Y., Büyükburç U.: Effects of seed rates on forage production, seed yield and hay quality of annual legume-barley mixtures. Turk. J. Agric. For., 2003; 27: 169-174.
- Yılmaz, S., Günel, E., Sağlamtimur, T.: Determination of the most suitable seeding rates and cutting ties of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) + barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mixture under Hatay ecological condition. 3rd Rangeland and Forage Crops Congress, Erzurum, Turkey. 1996; 355-361.
- Lithourgidis, A.S., Vasilakoglou, I.B., Dhima, K.V., Dordas, C.A., Yiakoulaki, M.D.: Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Res., 2006; 99: 106-113.
- Karadağ, Y.: Forage yields, seed yields and botanical composition of some legume-barley mixtures under rainfed condition in semi- arid regions of Turkey. Asian J. Plant Sci., 2004; 3: 295-299.
- Singh, A., Dhingra, K.K., Singh, J., Singh, M.P.. Effect of sowing time and plant density on growth, yield and quality of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A.Br.). J. Res., Punjab Agricult. Univ., 2002; 39: 471-475.
- Qamar, I.A., Keatinge, J.D.H., Mohammad, N., Ali, A., Khan, M.A.: Introduction and management of vetch/barley forage mixtures in the rainfed areas of Pakistan. 2. Forage quality. Aust. J. Agr. Res., 1999; 50: 11-20.
- Nelson, C.J., Moser, L.E.: Factors affecting forage quality. In: Fahey, G.C. Jr., (Ed.). Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Crop Science Society of America, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, WI. 1994; 115-154.
- Tan, M., Serin Y.: Değişik fiğ+tahıl karışımları için en uygun karışım oranını ve biçim zamanının belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 1996; 27: 475-489.