Morphological similarities between Spanish pigeon breeds

Relationships among 30 pigeon breeds were studied using data from 31 morphological characteristics. The relationships between breeds obtained from the study were rather congruent with the classification used by fanciers groups. The average Euclidean distance between pigeon breeds was 0.93 ± 0.16 STD. The results obtained were very compatible with those described in the literature for each classificatory group. Three large, perfectly definite clusters could be observed in this tree. A cluster was formed by Balearic nonpouter breeds and the Catalan Bare Pigeon. Another cluster occupied an intermediate position and was formed by thief pouters. They shared some remarkable peculiar features that are morphologically very different from the other breeds. A third more diversified cluster was close to the Turkish Takla Tumbler, which was used as outgroup.

PDF

___

1. Bodio, S.: Aloft: A Meditation on Pigeons and Pigeon-Flying. Lyons & Burford Publishers, New York. 1990.
2. Sambraus, H.H.: A Colour Atlas of Livestock Breeds. Wolfe Publishing Ltd, Germany. 1992.
3. Patent, D.H.: Pigeons. Clarion Books, New York. 1997.
4. Levy, W.M.: Encyclopedia of Pigeon Breeds. Levi Publishing Co. Sumter, South Carolina. 1965.
5. Jordana, J., Manteca, X., Ribo, O.: Comparative analysis of morphological and behavioral characters in the domestic dog and their importance in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships in canids. Genet. Mol. Biol., 1999; 22: 4957.
6. Roelfsema, J.: Conservation of the Gelderse Slenk. Major Thesis. WUR, 2007.
7. Mackrott, H.: Palomas de Raza. Omega, Barcelona. 1997.
8. Schille, H.-J.: Guía de las Palomas de Raza. Arte Avícola. Valls, 2005.
9. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., Ryan, P. D.: PAST. Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 2001; 4 (1). Online: http://palaeoelectronica. org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.html.
10. Kitching, I.J., Forey, P.L., Humphries, C.J., Williams, D.M.: Cladistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1998.
11. Naylor, G., Kraus, F.: The relationship between s and m and the retention index. Syst. Biol., 1995; 44: 559562.
12. Farris, J.S.: The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics, 1989; 5: 417419.
13. Sneath, P.H.A., Sokal, R.R.: Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973.
14. Jerolmack, C.: Animal archaeology: Domestic pigeons and the nature-culture dialectic. Qualitative Sociology Review III, 2007; (1): 7495.