İzmir Körfezi ihtiyoplanktonu: Balık yumurta ve larvalarının bir yıllık incelenmesi

This study was carried out in order to determine the species diversity, abundance, and distribution and seasonal frequency occurrence times of the eggs and larvae of Teleost fish in Izmir Bay during 1989-1990. A total of 32140 eggs and 6582 larvae were collected from plankton samples and 69 species belonging to 27 families were identified. The most abundant families included Sparidae 23.79%, Clupeidae 24.63%, Mullidae 12.22%, Serranidae 8.72% and Mugilidae 8.04% of total eggs, and Gobiidae 67.38%, Sparidae 9.43% and Blennidae 9.31% of total larvae. In this study, with regard to eggs, because some species preferred to release their eggs in clean water, stations in the outer bay showed similarities, while stations in the middle bay formed various groups amongst themselves. From the point of view of larvae, apart from station 2, which was near the lagoon area in the middle bay, the other stations were similar. The reason for this is the abundance of species of the Gobiidae family specific to that area. In areas with a low diversity index in respect of eggs, the presence of dominant species was detected. The highest diversity index and frequency of occurrence of fish eggs and larvae were determined in spring, the reason for this being that the spawning period of many fish species in Izmir Bay begins at the end of spring. In the middle and outer bay, where the stations in this study were situated, the pollution in Izmir Bay was found generally not to influence the species diversity of fish eggs and larvae.

The ichthyoplankton of İzmir by : A one-year study of fish eggs and larvae

This study was carried out in order to determine the species diversity, abundance, and distribution and seasonal frequency occurrence times of the eggs and larvae of Teleost fish in Izmir Bay during 1989-1990. A total of 32140 eggs and 6582 larvae were collected from plankton samples and 69 species belonging to 27 families were identified. The most abundant families included Sparidae 23.79%, Clupeidae 24.63%, Mullidae 12.22%, Serranidae 8.72% and Mugilidae 8.04% of total eggs, and Gobiidae 67.38%, Sparidae 9.43% and Blennidae 9.31% of total larvae. In this study, with regard to eggs, because some species preferred to release their eggs in clean water, stations in the outer bay showed similarities, while stations in the middle bay formed various groups amongst themselves. From the point of view of larvae, apart from station 2, which was near the lagoon area in the middle bay, the other stations were similar. The reason for this is the abundance of species of the Gobiidae family specific to that area. In areas with a low diversity index in respect of eggs, the presence of dominant species was detected. The highest diversity index and frequency of occurrence of fish eggs and larvae were determined in spring, the reason for this being that the spawning period of many fish species in Izmir Bay begins at the end of spring. In the middle and outer bay, where the stations in this study were situated, the pollution in Izmir Bay was found generally not to influence the species diversity of fish eggs and larvae.

___

  • 1.Balkas, T.I., Juhasz, F.: Costs and benefits of measures for thereduction of degradation of the environment from land-basedsources of pollution in coastal areas. A-case study of the Bay of‹zmir. UNEP, MAP Technical Reports Series, 1993; 72: 1-28.
  • 2.Trumbic, I.: Coastal area management programme for the Bay of‹zmir: A synthesis report. UNEP, MAP Priority Actions Programme,1993; 1-17.
  • 3.Mater, S.: ‹zmir Körfezi’nde sardalya bal›¤› Sardina pilchardus(Wal., 1792) yumurta ve larvalar› üzerine biyolojik ve ekolojikçal›flmalar. Tübitak VI. Bilim Kongresi. 1977; 47.
  • 4.Mater, S.: Effects of pollution on abundance and distribution ofTeleost fish eggs in ‹zmir Bay (Aegean Sea, Turkey). Rapp. Comm.Int. Mer. Médit., 1981; 27 (5):147-150.
  • 5.Mater, S.: ‹zmir Körfezi’ nde baz› Teleost bal›klar›n pelajik yumurtave larvalar› üzerine araflt›rmalar. Doçentlik Tezi. E.Ü. Fen Fak. B.Oseanografi Böl. ve Hidrobiyoloji Enst., 1981; 1-117.
  • 6.Cihangir, B.: Ege Denizi ‹zmir Körfezi’nde 1989-1990 üremedöneminde sardalya bal›¤› Sardina pilchardus(Wal., 1792)’unyumurtalar›n›n bolluk ve da¤›l›m›. J. of Zoology, 1991; 19: 17-26.
  • 7.Hoflsucu, B.: ‹zmir Körfezi' ndeki dil bal›¤› (Solea soleaL., 1758)'n›n biyoekolojisi ve akuakültüre alma olanaklar› üzerindearaflt›rmalar. Doktora Tezi, E.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enst. Su ÜrünleriAnabilim Dal›, 1991; 1-91.
  • 8.Hoflsucu, B.: ‹zmir Körfezi’ nin sardalya bal›¤› (Sardina pilchardus,Walb.) yumurta ve larvalar› üzerinde baz› biyo-ekolojikaraflt›rmalar. ‹stanbul Üniversitesi Su Ürün. Derg., 1992; 2: 5-12.
  • 9.Hoflsucu, B., Mater, S.: ‹zmir Körfezi’ nde (Ege Denizi, Türkiye)t›rsi bal›¤›n›n (Sardinella aurita, Val., 1847) yumurta ve larvalar›üzerine biyo-ekolojik bir çal›flma. E.Ü. Su Ürün. Derg., 1995; 12:109-115.
  • 10. Mater, S., Uçal, O., Kaya, M.: Investigation on the abundance anddistribution of pelagic eggs and larvae of Teleost fishes from ‹zmirBay. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer. Medit., 1990; 32: 303.
  • 11. Pielou, E.C.: Ecological Diversity. John Wiley and Sons, New York,1975; 165.
  • 12. Pielou, E.C.: Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, 1977;385.
  • 13. Bray, J.R., Curtis, J.T.: An ordination of the Upland Forestcommunities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monog., 1957; 27:235-249.
  • 14. D. B. T. E.: ‹zmir Körfezi 1994-1998 Deniz araflt›rmalar›. DokuzEylül University 1994-96 Final raporu, No: DPTE-098, 1997.
  • 15. Sánehez-Velasco, L., Flores-Coto, C., Shirasago, B.: Fish larvaeabundance and distribution in the coastal zone of TerminosLagoon, Campeche (Southern Gulf of Mexico). Estuarine, Coastaland Shelf Sci. 1996; 43: 707-721.
  • 16. Kruskall, J. B.: Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness offit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 1964; 29 (1): 1-27
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK