In situ degradation of almond (Prunus dulcis L.) hulls, a potential feed material for ruminants

The nutritive values of almond hulls (Ahs), alfalfa (ALF), and sugar beet pulp (SBP) were determined using the in situ nylon bag technique. The ruminal dry matter (DM) degradation kinetics of 4 varieties of Ahs were compared with ALF and SBP. The almond varieties tested were Rabbi (RAB), Mamaii (MAM), Shahrud 15 (SH15), and Shokufe (SH). Samples were incubated in triplicate at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h in 3 rumen-fistulated steers. The average total degradability fraction (TDF) of DM in Ahs was 89.00%. Although the TDF of Ahs (86.50%) was lower than that of SBP (98.00%), it was higher (P < 0.05) than that of ALF (67.00%). The soluble (a) fraction in Ahs (55.00%) was higher than in both ALF (20.00%) and SBP (26.00%). This high (a) fraction of Ahs was attributed to their relatively higher nonfibrous carbohydrate and lower neutral detergent fiber content than ALF and SBP. The degradation rate of ALF (0.14%) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) compared to the other samples, whereas that of SBP (0.05%) was not significantly different (P > 0.05) from those in Ahs. The results showed that Ahs are potential feed materials for ruminants.

In situ degradation of almond (Prunus dulcis L.) hulls, a potential feed material for ruminants

The nutritive values of almond hulls (Ahs), alfalfa (ALF), and sugar beet pulp (SBP) were determined using the in situ nylon bag technique. The ruminal dry matter (DM) degradation kinetics of 4 varieties of Ahs were compared with ALF and SBP. The almond varieties tested were Rabbi (RAB), Mamaii (MAM), Shahrud 15 (SH15), and Shokufe (SH). Samples were incubated in triplicate at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h in 3 rumen-fistulated steers. The average total degradability fraction (TDF) of DM in Ahs was 89.00%. Although the TDF of Ahs (86.50%) was lower than that of SBP (98.00%), it was higher (P < 0.05) than that of ALF (67.00%). The soluble (a) fraction in Ahs (55.00%) was higher than in both ALF (20.00%) and SBP (26.00%). This high (a) fraction of Ahs was attributed to their relatively higher nonfibrous carbohydrate and lower neutral detergent fiber content than ALF and SBP. The degradation rate of ALF (0.14%) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) compared to the other samples, whereas that of SBP (0.05%) was not significantly different (P > 0.05) from those in Ahs. The results showed that Ahs are potential feed materials for ruminants.

___

  • Jafari S, Alizadeh A, Imani A. Nutritive value of different varieties of almond (Prunus dulcis) hulls. J Res Opin Anim Vet Sci 2011; 11: 734–738.
  • Yalchi T. Determination of digestibility of almond hull in sheep. Afri J Biotechnol 2011; 15: 3022–3026.
  • Fadel JG. Quantitative analyses of selected plant by-product feedstuffs, a global perspective. Anim Feed Sci Tech 1999; 79: 225–268.
  • Aguilar AA, Smith NE, Baldwin RL. Nutritional value of almond hulls for dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1984; 67: 97–103. 5. FAO. FAOSTAT Statistics. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2008. 6. Velasco J, Schoner JRC, Lofgreen GP. Composition and feeding value of almond hulls and hull-shell meal. Calif Agri 1965; 19: 12–14.
  • Alibés X, Maestre MR, Muñoz F, Combellas J, Rodriguez J. Nutritive value of almond hulls for sheep. Anim Feed Sci Tech 1983; 8: 63–67.
  • Norollahi H, Kamalzadeh A, Karimi A. Determination of chemical composition and digestibility of almond hull. Acta Horti 2005; 726: 591–594.
  • Reed BA, Brown DL. Almond hulls in diet for lactating goats (effects on yield and composition of milk, feed intake and digestibility). J Dairy Sci 1988; 71: 530–533.
  • Clutter SH, Rodiek AV. Feeding value of diet containing almond hulls. Equine Nutri Physiol Society 1992; 12.
  • Homedes MJ. Almond hulls in swine diet reduce body fat. Calif Agri 1985; 3: 47.
  • Getachew G, Robinson PH, DePeters EJ, Taylor SJ. Relationship between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2004; 111: 57–71.
  • Stern MD, Bach A, Calsamiglia S. Alternative techniques for measuring nutrient digestion in ruminants. J Anim Sci 1977; 75: 2256–2276.
  • Shem MN, Ørskov ER, Kimambo AE. Prediction of voluntary dry-matter intake, digestibility dry-matter intake and growth rate of cattle from the degradation characteristics of tropical foods. Anim Sci 1995; 60: 65–74.
  • AOAC. Official Method of Analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Analytical Chemists; 1990.
  • Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74: 3583–3597.
  • NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Research Council; 2001.
  • Makkar HPS, Becker K. Nutritional value of whole and ethanol antinutritional components of extracted Moringa oleifera leaves. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2003; 63: 211–228.
  • Mehrez AZ, Qrskov ER. A study of artificial fiber bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. J Agri Sci 1977; 80: 691–701.
  • Ørskov ER, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements according to rate of passage. J Anim Sci 1979; 92: 499–503.
  • SAS. SAS User’s Guide Int., Version 9.1. Cary, NC, USA: Statistical Analysis Institute, Inc.; 2003.
  • Yalchi T, Kargar S. Chemical composition and in situ ruminal degradability of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber from almond hulls. J Food Agri Envir 2010; 2: 781–784.
  • Ørskov ER, Reid GW, Kay M. Prediction of intake by cattle from degradation characteristics of roughages. Anim Prod 1988; 46: 29–34.
  • Nocek JE. Evaluation of specific variables affecting in situ estimates of ruminal dry matter and protein digestion. J Anim Sci 1985; 60: 1347–1358.
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibodies against the extracellular domain of the OxaA membrane protein of Mycoplasma suis

LIJUN JIA, MINGMING LIU, SHOUFA ZHANG, LEI ZHANG, HUANPING GUO, JIXU LI

Evaluation of the genetic resistance status to classical and atypicalscrapie in Karacabey merino rams

YALÇIN YAMAN, MEHMET İHSAN SOYSAL, CEMAL ÜN

The first report of Eucoleus dispar (Nematoda: Capillariidae) inthe common buzzard (Buteo buteo) in Turkey

DİNÇER YILDIZ, EMİNE ÜMRAN BOZKURT BÜYÜKÇOPUR, MURAT ERDEM GÜLTİKEN, KADER YILDIZ

Effects of long-term starvation and refeeding on fatty acid metabolism-relatedgene expressions in the liver of zebrafish, Danio rerio

Ayşe ÖLMEZ, Mehtap BAYIR, Chunfang WANG, Abdulkadir BAYIR

Seroepidemiological survey of leptospiral infection in stray dogs in Serbia

DRAGICA VOJINOVIC, NATASA BOGICEVIC, ANA VASIC, MARIJA MANIC, MILICA ELEZOVIC RADOVANOVIC, DRAGAN ROGOZARSKI, JOVAN MARIC, MIROSLAV VALCIC

Macroanatomical characteristics of plexus brachialis and its branches in martens (Martes foina)

YASİN DEMİRASLAN, MEVLÜT AYKUT, ÖZCAN ÖZGEL

Effects of probiotics, oligosaccharides, and berberine combinationson growth performance of pigs

Guoge FAN, Juan CHANG, Qingqiang YIN, Xiao WANG, Xiaowei DANG

Serum pharmacokinetics and tissue concentrations of a newrecrystallized enrofloxacin hydrochloride-dihydrate in hamsters

Alma CARRASCOSA, Alejandro De La PEÃ'A, Lilia GUTIERREZ, Hector SUMANO

Significance of homocysteine and cardiac markers in cattle with hypocalcemia

YILDIRAY BAŞBUĞAN, NAZMİ YÜKSEK, NURİ ALTUĞ

Development and validation of sandwich quantitative ELISA prototypebased on the bovine IFNg for the detection of cellular immunity

OKTAY GENÇ, ÖZLEM BÜYÜKTANIR, GÜLNUR SERDAR, YUNUS KILIÇOĞLU, SALİH OTLU