Comparison of sevoflurane and isoflurane effects on cardiovascular andrespiratory system during spontaneous ventilation in Angora goats

Seven healthy Angora goats were used to compare the effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems during anesthesia periods. Once anesthesia was induced with propofol at 5.1 ± 0.9 mg/kg, it was maintained with isoflurane at 1%-3% in the first treatment period and sevoflurane at 2%-4% in the second treatment period after a 15-day interval. Heart rates measured immediately after anesthesia induction and 5 min later were found to be statistically significant between anesthetic groups (P < 0.05). Mean blood pressure in the isoflurane group decreased (75.7 ± 7.2 to 59.8 ± 9.8 mmHg) (P < 0.05) throughout the anesthesia period. It was determined that respiratory rate in sevoflurane treatment was lower than that in isoflurane treatment. In terms of time to stand up, sevoflurane-administered animals recovered significantly faster than animals intubated with isoflurane anesthesia (13.1 ± 4.4 and 25.0 ± 8.6 min) (P < 0.05). According to cardiopulmonary values, the respiratory rate was lower in the sevoflurane-applied animals compared to that of those receiving isoflurane anesthesia, although the difference was not statistically significant, and hypercapnia were not observed in either group. Consequently, it was determined that in the Angora goat, propofol-sevoflurane anesthesia exerts lower pressure on the cardiovascular system than isoflurane anesthesia. At the same time, recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia was shorter, and therefore it can be preferred to other anesthesia agents for routine anesthesia.

Comparison of sevoflurane and isoflurane effects on cardiovascular andrespiratory system during spontaneous ventilation in Angora goats

Seven healthy Angora goats were used to compare the effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems during anesthesia periods. Once anesthesia was induced with propofol at 5.1 ± 0.9 mg/kg, it was maintained with isoflurane at 1%-3% in the first treatment period and sevoflurane at 2%-4% in the second treatment period after a 15-day interval. Heart rates measured immediately after anesthesia induction and 5 min later were found to be statistically significant between anesthetic groups (P < 0.05). Mean blood pressure in the isoflurane group decreased (75.7 ± 7.2 to 59.8 ± 9.8 mmHg) (P < 0.05) throughout the anesthesia period. It was determined that respiratory rate in sevoflurane treatment was lower than that in isoflurane treatment. In terms of time to stand up, sevoflurane-administered animals recovered significantly faster than animals intubated with isoflurane anesthesia (13.1 ± 4.4 and 25.0 ± 8.6 min) (P < 0.05). According to cardiopulmonary values, the respiratory rate was lower in the sevoflurane-applied animals compared to that of those receiving isoflurane anesthesia, although the difference was not statistically significant, and hypercapnia were not observed in either group. Consequently, it was determined that in the Angora goat, propofol-sevoflurane anesthesia exerts lower pressure on the cardiovascular system than isoflurane anesthesia. At the same time, recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia was shorter, and therefore it can be preferred to other anesthesia agents for routine anesthesia.

___

  • Alibhai HIK. Caprine anaesthesia: aspects of inhalation anaesthesia in the goat. MSc, University of London, London, UK, 2001.
  • Antognini JF, Eisele PH. Anesthetic potency and cardiopulmonary effects of enflurane, halothane, and isoflurane in goats. Lab Anim Sci 1993; 43: 607–610. 3. Branson KR. Injectable and alternative anesthetic techniques. In: Tranquilli WJ, Thurman JC, Grimm KA, editors. Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. 4th ed. Ames, IA, USA: Blackwell; 2007. pp. 273–299.
  • Glowaski MM, Wetmore LA. Propofol: application in veterinary sedation and anesthesia. Clin Tech Small An P 1999; 14: 1–9. 5. Sawyer DC. Injectable anesthetics. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1998; 59: 171–181.
  • Muir WW. Considerations for general anesthesia. In: Tranquilli WJ, Thurman JC, Grimm KA, editors. Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. 4th ed. Ames, IA, USA: Blackwell; 2007. pp. 7–30.
  • White FP. Propofol: its role in changing the practice of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 1132–1136. 8. Hall LW, Clarke KW. Veterinary Anaesthesia, 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: WB Saunders; 1991.
  • Hartsfield SM. Airway management and ventilation. In: Tranquilli WJ, Thurman JC, Grimm KA, editors. Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia. 4th ed. Ames, IA, USA: Blackwell; 2007. pp. 495–531.
  • Hikasa Y, Hokushin S, Takase K, Ogasawara S. Cardiopulmonary, hematological, serum biochemical and behavioral effects of sevoflurane compared with isoflurane or halothane in spontaneously ventilating goats. Small Ruminant Res 2002; 43: 167–178.
  • Riebold TW. Anesthesia and immobilization of specific species: ruminants. In: Thurmon JC, Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ, editors. Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. 3rd. ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996. pp. 610–626.
  • Topal A. Veteriner Anestezi. Nobel & Güneş: Bursa, Turkey; 2005 (in Turkish).
  • Carroll GL, Hooper RN, Slater MR, Hartsfield SM, Matthews NS. Detomidine-butorphanol-propofol for carotid artery translocation and castration or ovariectomy in goats. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 75–82.
  • Kästner SBR, Von Rechenberg B, Keller K, Bettschart- Wolfensberger R. Comparison of medetomidine and dexmedetomidine as premedication in isoflurane anaesthesia for orthopaedic surgery in domestic sheep. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2001; 48: 231–241.
  • Kutter APN, Kästner SBR, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R, Huhtinen M. Cardiopulmonary effects of dexmedetomidine in goats and sheep anaesthetised with sevoflurane. Vet Rec 2006; 159: 624–629.
  • Lin HC, Purohit RC, Powe TA. Anesthesia in sheep with propofol or with xylazine-ketamine followed by halothane. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 247–252.
  • Prassinos NN, Galatos AD, Raptopoulos D. A comparison of propofol, thiopental or ketamine as induction agents in goats. Vet Anaesth Analg 2005; 32: 289–296.
  • Hikasa Y, Okuyama K, Kakuta T, Takase K, Ogasawara S. Anesthetic potency and cardiopulmonary effects of sevoflurane in goats: comparison with isoflurane and halothane. Can J Vet Res 1998; 62: 299–306.
  • Kästner SBR, Kull S, Kutter APN, Boller JB, Bettschart- Wolfensberger R, Huhtinen MK. Cardiopulmonary effects of dexmedetomidine in sevoflurane-anesthetized sheep with and without nitric oxide inhalation. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 1496– 1502.
  • Brown RH, Wagner EM. Mechanisms of bronchoprotection by anesthetic induction agents: propofol versus ketamine. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 822–828.
  • Pablo LS, Bailey JE, Ko JCH. Median effective dose of propofol required for induction of anesthesia in goats. JAVMA-J Am Vet Med A 1997; 211: 86–88.
  • Reid J, Nolan AM, Welsh E. Propofol as an induction agent in the goat: a pharmacokinetic study. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1993; 16: 488–493.
  • Mohamadnia AR, Hughes G, Clarke KW. Maintenance of anaesthesia in sheep with isoflurane, desflurane or sevoflurane. Vet Rec 2008; 163: 210–215.
  • Koç B, Sarıtaş KZ. Veteriner Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon. Malatya, Turkey: Medipress; 2004 (in Turkish).
  • Stern RC, Towler SC, White PF, Evers AS. Elimination kinetics of sevoflurane and halothane from blood, brain and adipose tissue in the rat. Anesth Analg 1990; 71: 658–664.
  • Clarke KW. Desflurane and sevoflurane. New volatile anesthetic agents. Vet Clin N Am-Small 1999; 29: 793–810.
  • Mutoh T, Nishimura R, Kim HY, Matsunaga S, Sasaki N. Cardiopulmonary effects of sevoflurane, compared with halothane, enflurane and isoflurane in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 885–890.
  • Cheng EY, Mazzeo AJ, Bosnjank ZJ, Coon RL, Kampine JP. Direct relaxant effects of intravenous anesthetics on airway smooth muscle. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 162–168.
  • Cravero JP, Beach M, Dodge CP, Whalen K. Emergence characteristics of sevoflurane compared to halothane in pediatric patients undergoing bilateral pressure equalization tube insertion. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 397–401.
  • Moos DD. Sevoflurane and emergence behavioral changes in pediatrics. J Perianesth Nurs 2005; 20: 13–18.
  • Matthews NS, Hartsfield SM, Mercer D, Beleac MH, Mackenthun A. Recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in horses: comparison to isoflurane and effect of post medication with xylazine. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 480–485.
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The effects of high setter and hatcher temperatures during incubation on slaughter weight and carcass yield in broilers

AYDIN İPEK, ARDA SÖZCÜ

Influence of individual or mixed cellulase and xylanase mixture on in vitro rumen gas production kinetics of total mixed rations with different maize silage and concentrate ratios

MONA MOHAMED MOHAMED YASSEEN ELGHANDOUR, Ahmed Eid KHOLIF, OFELIA MÁRQUEZ-MOLINA, Josド Fernando VÁZQUEZ-ARMIJO, Anil Kumar PUNIYA, Abdelfattah Zeidan Mohamed SALEM

Diurnal variations of renal activity in goats

ZBIGNIEW MUSZCZYNSKI, EWA SKOTNICKA, DOROTA JANKOWIAK

Association of Mx1 gene polymorphism with some economic traits in Meishan pigs

Xue Mei YIN, Ying LIU, Wen Hua DONG, Qiao Hui ZHAO, Guo Qiang ZHU, Sheng Long WU, Wen Bin BAO

Deactivation of tannins in raisin stalk by polyethylene glycol-6000 effect onfeed intake, digestibility, and nitrogen retention in sheep

MANOCHER SOURI, LALEH ANGAJI, MOHAMMAD MEHDI MOEINI

Determination of the survival levels of acid-adapted Escherichia coli O157:H7in sucuk (Turkish-type fermented sausage)

FATMA ÖZTÜRK, ABDULKADİR HALKMAN

Evaluation of serum enzyme activities and protein fractions in Brucella-infected cows

MOHAMED FAHMY ABOU ELAZAB

Low-field magnetic resonance anatomic features of the neonatalfoal thorax: an ex vivo study

Alberto ARENCIBIA, Josド チngel SANDOVAL, Francisco GIL, Josド Raduチn JABER, Diego BLANCO, Andrドs DIZ, Josド Marネa VÁZQUEZ

Storage stability of aerobically packaged extended dehydrated chickenmeat rings at ambient temperature

BIDYUT PRAVA MISHRA, GEETA CHAUHAN, SANJOD KUMAR MENDIRATTA, PRASANA KUMAR RATH, RENUKA NAYAR

Martina LICHOVNIKOVA, Libor KALHOTKA, Vojtech ADAM, Borivoj KLEJDUS, Vojtech ANDERLE