Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders among Computer Users

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine whether upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders are more prevalent in intense computer users and the relation between cumulative hours of computer use and symptoms. Materials and Methods: The study group included 100 bank workers, who worked more than 6 h per day for at least 2 years on a video display unit and were recruited through convenience sampling. Sixty-five age and sex matched healthy subjects who worked not more than 2 h on computer keyboards for office work constituted the control group. Results: There were no significant differences between groups when the age and sex of the participants were considered. The results suggest a high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities among intensive computer users. The differences were statistically significant except in neck range of motion and left cubital tunnel syndrome. As the time spent on video display unit increased, there is a tendency in occurrence of symptoms, but only in carpal tunnel syndrome the relation is significant. Conclusions: The findings showed that cumulative computer use time increased the risk of musculoskeletal disorders in the upper extremities. As the duration of job increased, the risk for carpal tunnel syndrome significantly increased. Further studies with the inclusion of a larger number of cases and potential risk factors would help clarify the role of variables in the aetiology of work-related neck and upper limb disorders.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Computers, upper extremity, musculoskeletal system

Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders among Computer Users

Keywords:

Computers, upper extremity, musculoskeletal system,

PDF

___

1. Gerr F, Marcus M, Monteilh C, Hannan L, Ortiz D, Kleinbaum D. A randomised controlled trial of postural interventions for prevention of musculoskeletal symptoms among computer users. Occup Environ Med 2005; 62: 478-487.
2. Pearce B. Ergonomic considerations in work-related upper extremity disorders. Clin Occup Environ Med 2006; 5 :249-266.
3. Marcus M, Gerr F, Monteilh C, Ortiz DJ, Gentry E, Cohen S, Edwards A, Ensor C, Kleinbaum D. A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med 2002; 41: 236-249.
4. Gerr F, Marcus M, Monteilh C. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders among computer users: lesson learned from the role of posture and keyboard use. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004; 14: 25-31.
5. Szeto GP, Straker LM, O'Sullivan PB. A comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers performing monotonous keyboard work--1: neck and shoulder muscle recruitment patterns. Man Ther 2005; 10: 270-280.
6. Hannan LM, Monteilh CP, Gerr F, Kleinbaum DG, Marcus M. Job strain and risk of musculoskeletal symptoms among a prospective cohort of occupational computer users. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005; 31: 375-386.
7. Salerno DF, Franzblau A, Werner RA, Chung KC, Schultz JS, Becker MP et al. Reliability of physical examination of the upper extremity among keyboard operators. Am J Ind Med 2000; 37: 423-430.
8. Malanga GA, Landes P, Nadler SF. Provocative tests in cervical spine examination: historical basis and scientific analyses. Pain Physician 2003; 6: 199-205.
9. Tomberlin JP, Saunder DS. Evaluation, treatment and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. 3rd ed.Chaska (MN):Saunders group;1995.
10. Califl M, Akgün K, Birtane M, Karacan I, Califl H, Tüzün F. Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2000; 59: 44-47.
11. Robertson C, Saratsiotis J. A review of compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005; 28: 345.
12. Salerno DF, Franzblau A, Werner RA, Chung KC, Schultz JS, Becker MP, Armstrong TJ.Reliability of physical examination of the upper extremity among keyboard operators. Am J Ind Med 2000; 37: 423-430.
13. Tinel J. Le signe du fourmillement dans les lesions des nerfs peripheriques. La Presse Medicale 1915; 47: 388-389.
14. Phalen GS. The Carpal-Tunnel Syndrome: Seventeen years’ experience in diagnosis and treatment of six hundred fifty-four hands. J Bone and Joint Surg 1966; 48: 211-228.
15. Lassen CF, Mikkelsen S, Kryger AI, Brandt LP, Overgaard E, Thomsen JF, Vilstrup I, Andersen JH. Elbow and wrist/hand symptoms among 6,943 computer operators: a 1-year follow-up study (the NUDATA study). Am J Ind Med 2004; 46: 521-533.
16. Gerr F, Monteilh CP, Marcus M. Keyboard use and musculoskeletal outcomes among computer users. J Occup Rehabil 2006; 16: 265-277.
17. Palmer KT, Cooper C, Walker-Bone K, Syddall H, Coggon D. Use of keyboards and symptoms in the neck and arm: evidence from a national survey. Occup Med (Lond) 2001; 51: 392-395.
18. Gerr F, Marcus M, Ensor C, Kleinbaum D, Cohen S, Edwards A, Gentry E, Ortiz DJ, Monteilh C. A prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med 2002; 41: 221-235.
19. Kryger AI, Andersen JH, Lassen CF, Brandt LP, Vilstrup I, Overgaard E, Thomsen JF, Mikkelsen S. Does computer use pose an occupational hazard for forearm pain; from the NUDATA study. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60: e14.
20. Jensen C. Development of neck and hand-wrist symptoms in relation to duration of computer use at work. Scan J Work Environ Health 2003; 29: 197-205.
21. Thomsen JF, Hansson GA, Mikkelsen S, Lauritzen M. Carpal tunnel syndrome in repetitive work: a follow-up study. Am J Ind Med 2002; 42: 344-353.
22. Andersen JH, Thomsen JF, Overgaard E, Lassen CF, Brandt LP, Vilstrup I, Kryger AI, Mikkelsen S. Computer use and carpal tunnel syndrome: a 1-year follow-up study. JAMA 2003; 289: 2963-2969.
23. Andersen JH, Harhoff M, Grimstrup S, Vilstrup I, Lassen CF, Brandt LP, Kryger AI, Overgaard E, Hansen KD, Mikkelsen S. Computer mouse use predicts acute pain but not prolonged or chronic pain in the neck and shoulder. Occup Environ Med 2008; 65: 126-131.
24. Schlossberg EB, Morrow S, Llosa AE, Mamary E, Dietrich P, Rempel DM. Upper extremity pain and computer use among engineering graduate students. Am J Ind Med 2004; 46: 297- 303.