Retrograde intrarenal surgery technique without using fluoroscopy and access sheet in the treatment of kidney stones
Retrograde intrarenal surgery technique without using fluoroscopy and access sheet in the treatment of kidney stones
Background/aim: In this study, we aimed to present our results on single-guidewire flexible ureteroscopy and retrograde intrarenalsurgery without fluoroscopy and an access sheet, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure retrospectively.Material and methods: Our routine technique can be described as the evaluation of the ureter using a semirigid ureterorenoscope(URS), leading in the guidewire through the semirigid URS, pulling the semirigid URS back, inserting the flexible URS with the aid ofthe guidewire, inserting the laser probe through the flexible URS, and performing laser lithotripsy.Results: Our study included 400 male and 198 female patients with a mean age of 36.8 ± 16 (14–80) years. The mean stone size was 8.7± 4 (8–20) mm, and the mean operation time was 56 (32–106) min. Postoperative fever was observed in 24 (4%) of the patients, and 30(5%) patients had hematuria as a minor complication. A stone-free status was observed in 466 (78%) patients, while 102 (17%) patientshad clinically insignificant minor stone fragments and 30 patients had clinically significant stone residue.Conclusion: The retrograde intrarenal surgery procedure using only a guidewire without fluoroscopy and an access sheet in thetreatment of kidney stones is technically safe and effective.
___
- 1. Alan C, Koçoğlu H, Ersay AR. Retrograd intrarenal cerrahi;
uygulama tekniği, klinik sonuçlar ve ipuçları. Yeni Üroloji
Dergisi 2011; 6: 32-41 (in Turkish).
- 2. Wendt-Nordahl G, Mut T, Krombach P, Michel MS, Knoll T.
Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher
treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res 2011; 39:
185-188.
- 3. Smith RD, Patel A. Impact of flexible ureterorenoscopy in
current management of nephrolithiasis. Curr Opin Urol 2007;
17: 114-119.
- 4. Belko DT, Denstedt JD. Advances in ureterorenoscopy. Urol
Clin North Am 2007; 34: 397-408.
- 5. Shah DJ, Sachs RK, Wilson DJ. Radiation-induced cancer: a
modern view. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 1166-1173.
- 6. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from
diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.
Lancet 2004; 363: 345-351.
- 7. Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Eisenberger F. The management of
complex stones. BJU Int 2000; 86: 919-928.
- 8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical
complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of
6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-
213.
- 9. Tefekli A, Tok A, Altunrende F, Barut M, Berberoglu Y,
Müslümanoğlu AY. Üriner sistem taş hastalarında yaşam tarzı
ve beslenme alışkanlıkları. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2005; 31: 113-
118 (in Turkish).
- 10. Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Lyon ES. Extending cystoscopic
techniques into the ureter and renal pelvis. Experience with
ureteroscopy and pyeloscopy. JAMA 1983; 250: 2002-2005.
- 11. Akpınar H, Tüfek İ, Gürtuğ A, Kural AR. Üst üriner sistem
hastalıklarının tanı ve tedavisinde fleksibl üreteroskopi. Türk
Üroloji Dergisi 2003; 29: 454-459 (in Turkish).
- 12. Reşorlu B, Ünsal A. Böbrek taşlarının tedavisinde retrograd
intrarenal cerrahi (RIRC). Türk Üroloji Seminerleri 2011; 2:
64-67 (in Turkish).
- 13. Mahesh M. Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues.
Radiographics 2001; 21: 1033-1045.
- 14. Geavlete P, Multescu R, Geavlete B. Health policy: reducing
radiation exposure time for ureteroscopic procedures. Nat Rev
Urol 2011; 8: 478-479.
- 15. Hellawell GO, Mutch SJ, Thevendran G, Wells E, Morgan RJ.
Radiation exposure and the urologist: what are the risks? J Urol
2005; 174: 948-952.
- 16. Mandhani A, Chaudhury H, Gupta N, Singh HK, Kapoor R,
Kumar A. Is fluoroscopy essential for retrieval of low ureteric
stones? Urol Int 2007; 78: 70-72.
- 17. Tepeler A, Armagan A, Akman T, Silay MS, Akcay M, Başıbüyük
I, Erdem MR, Önol ŞY. Is fluoroscopic imaging mandatory for
endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones? Urology 2012; 80:
1002-1006.
- 18. Çimen Hİ, Halis F, Sağlam HS, Gökçe A. Flouroscopy-free
technique is safe and feasible in retrograde intrarenal surgery
for renal stones. Turk J Urol 2017; 43: 309-312.
- 19. Kirac M, Tepeler A, Guneri C, Kalkan S, Kardas S, Armagan
A, Biri H. Reduced radiation fluoroscopy protocol during
retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney
stones. Urol J 2014; 11: 1589-1594.
- 20. Al-Qahtani SM, Letendre J, Thomas A, Natalin R, Saussez T,
Traxer O. Which ureteral access sheath is compatible with your
flexible ureteroscope? J Endourol 2014; 28: 286-290.
- 21. Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification
of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral
access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol 2013;
189: 580-584.
- 22. Oguz U, Balci M, Atis G, Bozkurt OF, Tuncel A, Halis F,
Aslan Y, Yildirim IO, Senocak C, Yordam M et al. Retrograde
intrarenal surgery in patients with isolated anomaly of kidney
rotation. Urolithiasis 2014; 42: 141-147.
- 23. Peng Y, Xu B, Zhang W, Li L, Liu M, Gao X, Sun Y. Retrograde
intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones: is
fluoroscopy-free technique achievable? Urolithiasis 2015; 43:
265-270.
- 24. Ray AA, Ghiculete D, Pace KT, Honey RJ. Limitations to
ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract
calculi. Urology 2010; 76: 295-300.
- 25. Heidenreich A, Desgrandschamps F, Terrier F. Modern
approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain:
review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 351-362.
- 26. Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G. Diagnostic performance
of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a metaanalyses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 396-401.