Kadriye ÖNEŞ, Gökşen GÖKŞENOĞLU, Mustafa Aziz YILDIRIM

Early term effects of robotic assisted gait training on ambulation and functional capacity in patients with spinal cord injury

Background/aim: The aim of the study was to determine the effects of robotic-assisted gait training on ambulation and functionalcapacity in patients with spinal cord injury.Materials and methods: In total, 88 patients were included and were randomly divided into two groups. The first group underwent 16sessions of robotic therapy training for 8 weeks and conventional therapy for 5 days a week. The second group underwent conventionaltreatment. The Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II was used to evaluate functional ambulation, and the functional independencemeasure score was used to assess patients’ functional independence levels in a blind manner.Results: A significant improvement was observed in both groups according to Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II and functionalindependence measure scores (P < 0.001). However, a significantly higher improvement according to the Walking Index for Spinal CordInjury II (P = 0.011) and functional independence measure scores (P = 0.022) was seen in the robotic group than in the control group.Conclusions: Robotic-assisted gait training combined with conventional therapy was found to be superior to the conventional therapyin terms of gait function and level of disability.

PDF

___

1. McDonald JW, Becker D, Huettner J. Spinal cord injury. In: Lanza R, Atala A,editors. Handbook of Stem Cells. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press; 2013. pp. 723-738.
2. Fehlings MG, Cadotte DW, Fehlings LN. A series of systematic reviews on the treatment of acute spinal cord injury: a foundation for best medical practice. Journal of Neurotrauma 2011; 28 (8): 1329-1333. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1955
3. Nas K, Yazmalar L, Şah V, Aydın A, Öneş K. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World Journal of Orthopedics 2015; 6 (1): 8-16. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.8
4. Ditunno PL, Patrick M, Stineman M, Ditunno JF. Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and crosssectional study. Spinal Cord 2008; 46 (7): 500-506. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102172
5. Ditunno JF Jr, Burns AS, Marino RJ. Neurological and functional capacity outcome measures: essential to spinal cord injury clinical trials. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2005; 42 (3): 35-41. doi: 10.1682/ JRRD.2004.08.0098
6. Edgerton VR, Tillakaratne NJ, Bigbee AJ, de Leon RD, Roy RR. Plasticity of the spinal neural circuitry after injury. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004; 27: 145-167. doi: 10.1146/ annurev.neuro.27.070203.144308
7. Dobkin BH. Spinal and supraspinal plasticity after incomplete spinal cord injury: correlations between functional magnetic resonance imaging and engaged locomotor networks. Progress in Brain Research 2000; 128: 99-111. doi: 10.1016/S0079- 6123(00)28010-2
8. AuYong N, Lu DC. Neuromodulation of the lumbar spinal locomotor circuit. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 2014; 25 (1): 15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2013.08.007
9. Tefertiller C, Pharo B, Evans N, Winchester P. Efficacy of rehabilitation robotics for walking training in neurological disorders: a review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2011; 48: 387-394. doi: 10.1682/ JRRD.2010.04.0055
10. Dietz V, Müller R, Colombo G. Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain 2002; 125 (12): 2626-2634. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf273
11. Winchester P, McColl R, Querry R, Foreman N, Mosby J et al. Changes in supraspinal activation patterns following robotic locomotor therapy in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2005; 19 (24): 313-324. doi: 10.1177/1545968305281515
12. Hwang S, Kim HR, Han ZA, Lee BS, Kim S et al. Improved gait speed after robot-assisted gait training in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury: a preliminary study. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2017; 41 (1): 34-41. doi: 10.5535/ arm.2017.41.1.34
13. Wirz M, Zemon DH, Rupp R, Scheel A, Colombo G et al. Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005; 86 (4): 672-680. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.004
14. Alcobendas-Maestro M, Esclarín-Ruz A, Casado-López RM, Muñoz-González, A, Pérez-Mateos G et al. Lokomat roboticassisted versus overground training within 3 to 6 months of incomplete spinal cord lesion: randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2012; 26 (9): 1058-1063. doi: 10.1177/1545968312448232
15. Schwartz I, Sajina A, Neeb M, Fisher I, Katz-Luerer M et al. Locomotor training using a robotic device in patients with subacute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011; 49 (10): 1062- 1067. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.59
16. Field-Fote EC, Roach KE. Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. Physical Therapy 2011; 91 (1): 48-60. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090359
17. Nam KY, Kim HJ, Kwon BS, Park JW, Lee HJ et al. Robotassisted gait training (Lokomat) improves walking function and activity in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2017; 14 (1): 24. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0232-3
18. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2011;34(6):535-546. doi: 10.1179/204 577211X13207446293695
19. Ditunno JF Jr, Ditunno PL, Scivoletto G, Patrick M, Dijkers M et al. The Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI/ WISCI II): nature, metric properties, use and misuse. Spinal Cord 2013; 51 (5): 346-355. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.9
20. Lundgren-Nilsson A, Tennant A, Grimby G, Sunnerhagen KS. Cross-diagnostic validity in a generic instrument: an example from the Functional Independence Measure in Scandinavia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2006; 4 (1): 55. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-55
21. Piepmeier JM, Jenkins NR. Late neurological changes following traumatic spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurosurgery 1988; 69 (3): 399-402. doi: 10.3171/jns.1988.69.3.0399
22. Morawietz C, Moffat F. Effects of locomotor training after incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013; 94 (11): 2297- 2308. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.023
23. Shin JC, Kim JY, Park HK, Kim NY. Effect of robotic-assisted gait training in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2014;38(6);719-725. doi: 10.5535/arm.2014.38.6.719