Ocular surface culture changes in patients after septoplasty

To investigate the interrelationships between pre- and postoperative microbiological changes by taking samples from both eyes of 40 patients who underwent septoplasty due to septal deviation. Materials and methods: Forty patients diagnosed with septal deviation who underwent a septoplasty operation under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study. The study was conducted on 40 patients who met the inclusion criteria and attended follow-up visits. One day before the operation and 48 h after the operation, cultures were taken individually from the conjunctivas and puncta of both eyes and sent to the microbiology laboratory. Results: Patients who were candidates for nasal surgery due to their symptoms and clinical examination results were randomly selected and 40 of these completed the study. No statistically significant differences in bacterial growth were observed between the eyes before the operation (P > 0.05). There were, however, statistically significant differences between the eyes in terms of bacterial growth in the postoperative period (P < 0.05). Pathogenic bacterial cultures were grown in 47 eyes in the postoperative period, and this finding was statistically significant. In the eye cultures, the most commonly isolated pathogens were S. epidermidis, and S. aureus. Conclusion: Although the indicated microorganisms isolated from the patient groups were grown in cultures, there were neither clinical symptoms nor signs related to ocular infections.

Ocular surface culture changes in patients after septoplasty

To investigate the interrelationships between pre- and postoperative microbiological changes by taking samples from both eyes of 40 patients who underwent septoplasty due to septal deviation. Materials and methods: Forty patients diagnosed with septal deviation who underwent a septoplasty operation under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study. The study was conducted on 40 patients who met the inclusion criteria and attended follow-up visits. One day before the operation and 48 h after the operation, cultures were taken individually from the conjunctivas and puncta of both eyes and sent to the microbiology laboratory. Results: Patients who were candidates for nasal surgery due to their symptoms and clinical examination results were randomly selected and 40 of these completed the study. No statistically significant differences in bacterial growth were observed between the eyes before the operation (P > 0.05). There were, however, statistically significant differences between the eyes in terms of bacterial growth in the postoperative period (P < 0.05). Pathogenic bacterial cultures were grown in 47 eyes in the postoperative period, and this finding was statistically significant. In the eye cultures, the most commonly isolated pathogens were S. epidermidis, and S. aureus. Conclusion: Although the indicated microorganisms isolated from the patient groups were grown in cultures, there were neither clinical symptoms nor signs related to ocular infections.

___

  • Ketcham AS, Han JK. Complications and management of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2010; 43: 897–904.
  • Eviatar E, Kessler A, Segal S, Vaiman M, Kalmovich LM. Effects of septoplasty on the nasal flora. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20: 40–42.
  • Okur E, Yildirim I, Aral M, Cıragil P, Kiliç MA, Gul M. Bacteremia during open septorhinoplasty. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20: 36–39.
  • Karna G, Akalın E. İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları. 2nd ed. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 1997 (in Turkish).
  • Apuhan T, Koçoğlu E, Yıldırım YS, Şimşek T, Kazaz H, Gök Ü. Effects of septoplasty on nasal and oropharyngeal microbial flora. Afr J Microbiol Res 2011; 5: 4583–4587.
  • Chow JM, Hartman J, Stankiewicz JA. Endoscopic directed cultures of the maxillary sinus ostium. Op Tec Otol Head Neck Surg 1993; 4: 86–89.
  • Klossek JM, Dubreuil L, Richet H, Richet B, Sedallian A, Beutter P. Bacteriology of the adult middle meatus. J Laryngol Otol 1996; 110: 847–849.
  • Özkırış M, Kapusuz Z, Saydam L. Comparison of nasal packs with transseptal suturing after nasal septal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 2013; 34: 308–311.
  • De Vries N, Van Der Baan S. Toxic shock syndrome after nasal surgery: is prevention possible? A case report and review of literature. Rhinology 1989; 27: 125–128.
  • Reiter D, Alfort E, Jabourian Z. Alternative to packing in septorhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115: 1203–1205.
  • Todd JK, Todd BH, Franco-Buff A, Smith CM, Lawellin DW. Influence of focal growth conditions on the pathogenesis of toxic shock syndrome. J Infect Dis 1987; 155: 673–681.
  • Tierno PM, Hana BA. Magnesium and the production of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 by Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 1986; 153: 994–995.
  • Bergdoll MS, Czop JK, Gould SS. Enterotoxin synthesis by the staphylococci. Ann NY Acad Sci 1974; 236: 307–316.
  • Yalçın Ş, Çelik O. Anterior nazal tamponların burun florası üzerine etkileri. Türk ORL Arşivi 1993; 31: 81–84 (in Turkish).
  • Kurtaran H, Ark N, Sadıkoğlu F, Uğur KŞ, Yılmaz T, Yıldırım Z, Aktaş D. The effect of anterior nasal packing with airway tubes on pulmonary function following septoplasty. Turk J Med Sci 2009; 39: 537–540.
  • Smith CB, Jacobson JA. Toxic Shock Syndrome. Disease-AMonth. Chicago, IL, USA: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1989. pp. 76–118.
  • Oluwole AO, Hanif J. Proptosis following nasal tamponade. J Laryngol Otol 1996; 110: 265–266.
  • Finelli PF, Ross JW. Endocarditis following nasal packing: need for prophylaxis [letter]. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 19: 984–985.
  • Streitmann MJ, Frable MA. Soft palate perforation: a complication of posterior nasal packing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 114: 806–807.
  • Bhattacharyya N, Wenokur RK, Goodman ML. Endoscopic excision of a giant pyogenic granuloma of the nasal cavity caused by nasal packing. Rhinology 1997; 35: 44–45.
  • Sheen TS, Ko JY, Hsu YH. Pyogenic granuloma - an uncommon complication of nasal packing. Am J Rhinol 1997; 11: 225–227. Pinczower E, Rice D. Drug-induced dystonia and airway obstruction in a patient with nasal packing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 103: 658–659.
  • Özel HE, Gür ÖE, Arıkan S, Özdem C. Objective and subjective effects of surgical treatment of nasal obstructions in patients with asthma. Turk J Med Sci 2011; 41: 435–441.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of outer hair cell function and medial olivocochlear efferent system in patients with type II diabetes mellitus

Hayriye KARABULUT, İsmail KARABULUT, Muharrem DAĞLI, Yıldırım Ahmet BAYAZIT, Şule BİLEN, Yusuf AYDIN, Serdar GÜLER, İsmet BAYRAMOĞLU

An investigation of pulmonary findings of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever patients

Gülden BİLGİN, Çiğdem ATAMAN HATİPOGLU, Şerife ALTUN, Cemal BULUT, Sami KINIKLI, Ali Pekcan DEMİRÖZ

PUVA phototherapy-induced secondary amyloidosis in patients with mycosis fungoides: a rare adverse effect of phototherapy Itır

Ebru ZEMHERİ, İlkin ZİNDANCI, Serkan ŞENOL, Filiz DEMİR2TOPALOĞLU, Özge AKBULAK, Sıdıka Şeyma ÖZKANLI

Protective role of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on serum cholinesterase inhibition by acute exposure to diazinon in rats

Esin OĞUZHANOĞLU, Ahmet Cenk ANDAÇ, Adnan TÜFEK, Lütfi YAVUZ, Hüseyin VURAL, Osman GÖKALP

Detection of cagA and vacA genotypes of Helicobacter pylori isolates from a university hospital in Ankara region, Turkey

Ceren ERDOĞDU, Zeynep SARIBAŞ, Yakut Akyön YILMAZ

Choroidal thickness in healthy Turkish subjects

Erol COŞKUN, Seydi OKUMUŞ, Bülent GÜRLER, Ramazan YAYUSPAYI, Burak ÖREN, Erdal KAYDU, Ayşegül ÇÖMEZ, İbrahim ERBAĞCI

Factors associated with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and validation in a sample of the Turkish population

Mustafa SÜREN, İsmail OKAN, Aziz Mehmet GÖKBAKAN, Ziya KAYA, Ünal ERKORKMAZ, Semih ARICI, Serkan KARAMAN, Mürsel KAHVECİ

Ocular surface culture changes in patients after septoplasty

Mahmut ÖZKIRIŞ, Zeliha KAPUSUZ GENCER, Çiğdem KADER, Levent SAYDAM

Liver enzymes, mean platelet volume, and red cell distribution width in gestational diabetes

Serpil ERDOĞAN, Özhan ÖZDEMİR, Halef Okan DOĞAN, Sevilay SEZER, Cemal Reşat ATALAY, Fatma Meriç YILMAZ, Yüksel KOCA

Right-sided double-lumen tubes: need for design improvement and better insertion technique?

Jean S. BUSSIÈRES, Jérôme LEMIEUX, Jacques SOMMA