Factors associated with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and validation in a sample of the Turkish population

The aim of this study was to validate the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in the Turkish population and to investigate its correlation with the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. Materials and methods: Volunteer patients, who were scheduled for elective surgery and who applied to the Outpatient Clinic of Anesthesiology for preoperative evaluation, were asked to complete a PCS form. The patient's age, sex, educational level, marital status, presence of chronic pain, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were recorded, and PCS scores and demographic variables were compared statistically. Results: Of the 257 patients enrolled in the study, 136 were male, 121 female, and the median age was 40. The 3 subscales in the Turkish version of the PCS consisted of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Internal consistency of PCS was found to be congruent with Cronbach's a = 0.90. Significantly higher PCS scores were found in women with chronic pain. In addition, patients who graduated from primary school had statistically higher scores compared to those who graduated from high school. Conclusion: In accordance with the original scale, demographic specifications of the Turkish version of the PCS were found congruent. PCS scores in our population were found compatible with the literature review.

Factors associated with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and validation in a sample of the Turkish population

The aim of this study was to validate the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in the Turkish population and to investigate its correlation with the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. Materials and methods: Volunteer patients, who were scheduled for elective surgery and who applied to the Outpatient Clinic of Anesthesiology for preoperative evaluation, were asked to complete a PCS form. The patient's age, sex, educational level, marital status, presence of chronic pain, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were recorded, and PCS scores and demographic variables were compared statistically. Results: Of the 257 patients enrolled in the study, 136 were male, 121 female, and the median age was 40. The 3 subscales in the Turkish version of the PCS consisted of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Internal consistency of PCS was found to be congruent with Cronbach's a = 0.90. Significantly higher PCS scores were found in women with chronic pain. In addition, patients who graduated from primary school had statistically higher scores compared to those who graduated from high school. Conclusion: In accordance with the original scale, demographic specifications of the Turkish version of the PCS were found congruent. PCS scores in our population were found compatible with the literature review.

___

  • Granot M, Ferber SG. The roles of pain catastrophizing and anxiety in the prediction of postoperative pain intensity: a prospective study. Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 439–45.
  • Fernandes L,  Storheim K,  Lochting I,  Grotle M. Crosscultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian pain catastrophizing scale in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13: 1–9.
  • Sullivan MJ, Thorn B, Haythornthwaite JA, Keefe F, Martin M, Bradley LA, Lefebvre JC. Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. Clin J Pain 2001; 17: 52–64.
  • Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995; 7: 524–32.
  • Tremblay I, Beaulieu Y, Bernier A, Crombez G, Laliberté S, Thibault P, Velly AM, Sullivan MJ. Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Francophone Adolescents: a preliminary validation. Pain Res Manag 2008; 13: 19–24.
  • Marić A, Banožić A, Ćosić A, Kraljević S, Sapunar D, Puljak L. Validation of the Croatian pain catastrophizing scale through a study on the influence of medical education on pain catastrophizing. Period Biol 2011: 113; 171–5.
  • Deyo RA. Pitfalls in measuring the health status of Mexican Americans: comparative validity of the English and Spanish Sickness Impact Profile. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 569–73.
  • Frischenschlager O, Pucher I. Psychological management of pain. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 416–22.
  • Turk DC, Okifuji A. Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution and revolution. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70: 678–90.
  • Keefe FJ, Abernethy AP, Campbell LC. Psychological approaches to understanding and treating disease-related pain. Annu Rev Psychol 2005; 56: 601–30.
  • Johnson C, Birthwistle J, Davis C. Pain in upper abdominal malignancy. Turk J Med Sci 2007; 37: 327–31.
  • Paksoy Erbaydar N, Çilingiroğlu N. Chronic pain and depression: a descriptive survey among adult primary health care centre patients. Turk J Med Sci 2010; 40: 707–14.
  • Lee EJ, Wu MY, Lee GK, Cheing G, Chan F. Catastrophizing as a cognitive vulnerability factor related to depression in workers’ compensation patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2008; 15: 182–92.
  • Papaioannou M, Skapinakis P, Damigos D, Mavreas V, Broumas G, Palgimesi A. The role of catastrophizing in the prediction of postoperative pain. Pain Med 2009; 10: 1452–9.
  • Leeuw M, Goossens ME, Linton SJ, Crombez G, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JW. The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med 2007; 30: 77–
  • Keefe FJ, Lefebvre JC, Egert JR, Affleck G, Sullivan MJ, Caldwell DS. The relationship of gender to pain, pain behavior, and disability in osteoarthritis patients: the role of catastrophizing. Pain 2000; 87: 325–34.
  • Pavlin DJ, Sullivan MJ, Freund PR, Roesen K. Catastrophizing: a risk factor for postsurgical pain. Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 83–90.
  • Sullivan MJL, Tripp DA, Santor D. Gender differences in pain and pain behavior: the role of catastrophizing. Cog Ther Res 2000; 24: 121–34.
  • Turner JA, Jensen MP, Warms CA, Cardenas DD. Catastrophizing is associated with pain intensity, psychological distress, and pain-related disability among individuals with chronic pain after spinal cord injury. Pain 2002; 98: 127–34.
  • Kırdemir P, Özorak Ö. Can postoperative pain and analgesic need be predicted in preoperative period? Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2011; 3: 951–9.
  • Osman A, Barrios FX, Kopper BA, Hauptmann W, Jones J, O’Neill E. Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the pain catastrophizing scale. J Behav Med 1997; 20: 589–605.
  • Ruscheweyh R, Nees F, Marziniak M, Evers S, Flor H, Knecht S. Pain catastrophizing and pain-related emotions: influence of age and type of pain. Clin J Pain 2011; 27: 578–86.
  • Wood BM,  Nicholas MK,  Blyth F,  Asghari A,  Gibson S. Catastrophizing  mediates the relationship between  pain  intensity and depressed mood in older adults with persistent pain. J Pain 2013; 14: 149–57.
  • Sullivan MJ, Stanish W, Waite H, Sullivan MJ, Tripp DA. Catastrophizing pain, and disability in patients with soft-tissue injuries. Pain 1998; 77: 253–60.
  • Severeijns R, Vlaeyen JW, van den Hout MA, Weber WE. Pain catastrophizing predicts pain intensity, disability, and psychological distress independent of the level of physical impairment. Clin J Pain 2001; 17: 165–72.
  • Sullivan MJ, Lynch ME, Clark AJ. Dimensions of catastrophic thinking associated with pain experience and disability in patients with neuropathic pain conditions. Pain 2005; 113: 310–
  • Forsythe ME, Dunbar MJ, Hennigar AW, Sullivan MJ, Gross M. Prospective relation between catastrophizing and residual pain following knee arthroplasty: two-year follow-up. Pain Res Manag 2008; 13: 335–41.
  • Yap JC, Lau J, Chen PP, Gin T, Wong T, Chan I, Chu J, Wong E. Validation of the Chinese pain catastrophizing scale (HK-PCS) in patients with chronic pain. Pain Med 2008; 9: 186–95.
  • Keefe FJ, Rumble ME, Scipio CD, Giordano LA, Perri LM. Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science. J Pain 2004; 5: 195–211.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of malaria cases in individuals after traveling to endemic regions of the world

Hülya ÇAŞKURLU, Emine PAKIR, Aslıhan ÇOLAK

Ocular surface culture changes in patients after septoplasty

Mahmut ÖZKIRIŞ, Zeliha KAPUSUZ GENCER, Çiğdem KADER, Levent SAYDAM

Incidental parathyroidectomy during thyroid surgery: risk factors, incidence, and outcomes

Bünyami ÖZOĞUL, Müfide Nuran AKÇAY, Abdullah KISAOĞLU

Urinary tract infection in patients with chronic kidney disease

Chih-yen HSIAO, Hsing-lin LIN, Yen-ko LIN, Chao-wen CHEN, Yuan-chia CHENG, Wei-che LEE, Tzu-chin WU

Single port thoracoscopic sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis in adolescence

Nesimi GÜNAL, Berkant ÖZPOLAT, Yasemin Dere GÜNAL, Koray DURAL

An investigation of pulmonary findings of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever patients

Gülden BİLGİN, Çiğdem ATAMAN HATİPOGLU, Şerife ALTUN, Cemal BULUT, Sami KINIKLI, Ali Pekcan DEMİRÖZ

Liver enzymes, mean platelet volume, and red cell distribution width in gestational diabetes

Serpil ERDOĞAN, Özhan ÖZDEMİR, Halef Okan DOĞAN, Sevilay SEZER, Cemal Reşat ATALAY, Fatma Meriç YILMAZ, Yüksel KOCA

Comparison of the effects of different percutaneous tracheotomy techniques on acute tracheal trauma

Cengiz Bekir DEMİREL, Hacer HALTAŞ, Hasan Kutluk PAMPAL, Yusuf ÜNAL, Berrin IŞIK, Mükerrem UYSAL

The obesity prevalence among students between the ages of 5 and 19 in Kütahya

Mustafa BİRİNCİ, Kamil TÜRKMEN, Aylin SAYAN, Mevlüt YILDIZ, Mehmet KAYA

Factors associated with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and validation in a sample of the Turkish population

Mustafa SÜREN, İsmail OKAN, Aziz Mehmet GÖKBAKAN, Ziya KAYA, Ünal ERKORKMAZ, Semih ARICI, Serkan KARAMAN, Mürsel KAHVECİ