Migraine prevalence, disability, and sociodemographic properties in the eastern region of Turkey: a population-based door-to-door survey
To determine the frequency of migraine in the eastern part of Turkey and its sociodemographic characteristics, impact on disability, and clinical aspects. Materials and methods: The study was conducted door-to-door in the eastern part of Turkey. Those who suffered from headaches were diagnosed with migraine as per the 2004 diagnosis criteria of the International Headache Society and its frequency was determined. Demographic data and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores were recorded. Results: Of the individuals evaluated, 60.4% (883) suffered from headaches, of which 43.6% (637) were evaluated as nonmigraine and 16.8% (246) as migraine headaches. Migraine prevalence was detected to be 10.3% (75) in men and 23.1% (171) in women. When the MIDAS scale was considered, 7.3% of the patients were classified with mild pain, 36.9% with mild to moderate pain, 41% with moderate pain, and 14.6% with severe pain. Conclusion: Migraine headache has a wide and complex range of symptoms and is frequently observed in women and young adults. The prevalence of migraine among the general population of eastern Turkey was found to be similar to the averages in the rest of the country, as well to the averages of studies in Europe.
Migraine prevalence, disability, and sociodemographic properties in the eastern region of Turkey: a population-based door-to-door survey
To determine the frequency of migraine in the eastern part of Turkey and its sociodemographic characteristics, impact on disability, and clinical aspects. Materials and methods: The study was conducted door-to-door in the eastern part of Turkey. Those who suffered from headaches were diagnosed with migraine as per the 2004 diagnosis criteria of the International Headache Society and its frequency was determined. Demographic data and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores were recorded. Results: Of the individuals evaluated, 60.4% (883) suffered from headaches, of which 43.6% (637) were evaluated as nonmigraine and 16.8% (246) as migraine headaches. Migraine prevalence was detected to be 10.3% (75) in men and 23.1% (171) in women. When the MIDAS scale was considered, 7.3% of the patients were classified with mild pain, 36.9% with mild to moderate pain, 41% with moderate pain, and 14.6% with severe pain. Conclusion: Migraine headache has a wide and complex range of symptoms and is frequently observed in women and young adults. The prevalence of migraine among the general population of eastern Turkey was found to be similar to the averages in the rest of the country, as well to the averages of studies in Europe.
___
- Scher AI, Stewart WF, Lipton RB. Migraine and headache: a meta-analytic approach. In: Crombie IK, editor. Epidemiology of Pain. Seattle, WA, USA: IASP Press; 1999. pp. 159–170. 2. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007; 68: 343–349.
- Nachit-Ouinekh F, Chrysostome V, Henry P, Sourgen C, Dartigues JF, El Hasnaoui A. Variability of reported headache symptoms and diagnosis of migraine at 12 months. Cephalalgia 2005; 25: 117–123.
- Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: 1–160. 5. Ertaş M, Siva A, Dalkara T, Uzuner N, Dora B, İnan L, İdiman F, Sarica Y, Selçuki D, Şirin H et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache 2004; 44: 786–793.
- Ertas M, Baykan B, Orhan EK, Zarifoglu M, Karli N, Saip S, Onal AE, Siva A. One-year prevalence and the impact of migraine and tension-type headache in Turkey: a nationwide home-based study in adults. J Headache Pain 2012; 13: 147– 157. 9. Celik Y, Ekuklu G, Tokuc B, Utku U. Migraine prevalence and some related factors in Turkey. Headache 2005; 45: 32–36.
- Stovner LJ, Andree C. Prevalence of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain 2010; 11: 289–299.
- Sachdev PS, Lipnicki DM, Crawford J, Reppermund S, Kochan NA, Trollor JN, Wen W, Draper B, Slavin MJ, Kang K et al. Factors predicting reversion from mild cognitive impairment to normal cognitive functioning: a population-based study. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2008; 4: 1155–1167.
- Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton RB, Scher AI, Steiner TJ, Zwart JA. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 193–210.
- Mannix LK, Files JA. The use of triptans in the management of menstrual migraine. CNS Drugs 2005; 19: 951–972.
- Steiner TJ, Scher Al, Stewart WF, Kolodner K, Liberman J, Lipton RB. The Prevalence and disability burden of adult migraine in England and their relationships to age, gender and ethnicity. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 519–527.
- Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, Diamond M, Reed M. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: Data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001; 41: 646–657.
- Lyngberg AC, Rasmussen BK, Jorgensen T, Jensen R. Has the prevalence of migraine and tension-type headache changed over a 12-year period? A Danish population survey. Eur J Epidemiol 2005; 20: 243–249.
- Cakmak G, Yayla V, Muhan A, Gülersönmez M, Apak İ. Socio- demographic evaluation of patients with migraine. Brain and Vascular Diseases Magazine 1996; 2: 29–31.
- Aygul R, Deniz O, Kocak N, Orhan A, Ulvi H. The clinical properties of a migraineuse population in eastern Turkey. South Med J 2005; 98: 23–27.
- Mathew NT. Migraine. In: Evans RW, Mathew NT, editors. Handbook of Headache. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. pp. 28–88.