Endoscopic polypectomy: outcomes of 467 cases in 20 years

Aim: Endoscopic polypectomy has an important place in the treatment of polyps&#8212;the preliminary lesions of colorectal cancers. This study aimed to discuss the outcomes of endoscopic polypectomy in 467 patients for 692 polyps over the course of 20 years. Materials and methods: The records of 692 endoscopic polypectomies performed in 467 patients between July 1988 and July 2008 were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Patient age ranged from 3 to 85 years (mean: 50.6 years), and 302 of the 467 (64.7%) patients were male. Polypectomy was performed for 692 polyps (mean: 1.5; range: 1-12). The most common polyp location was the rectum (41.5%), polyp diameter ranged between 1 and 40 mm (mean: 6.1 mm), and 451 of the polyps (65.2%) were pedunculated. In 2 (0.4%) patients, major complications developed, but there was no mortality. Histopathologically, 43.8% of the polyps were hyperplastic, 22.8% were adenomatous, 17.1% were mixed, 9.4% were hamartomas, 6.2% were serrated adenomas, and 0.7% were inflammatory polyps. The risk of malignant degeneration was significantly higher in patients with multiple polyps (P < 0.01), right colon polyps (P < 0.01), polyps larger than 10 mm (P < 0.01), sessile polyps (P < 0.01), and adenomatous polyps, mixed polyps, and serrated adenomas (P < 0.05). Of the 26 (5.6%) patients with malignant polyps, 6 in whom in situ and early carcinomas were detected were treated with polypectomy and followed-up with regular examinations. Another 20 patients with invasive carcinomas or familial polyposis were treated with surgery. Conclusion: Flexible endoscopic polypectomy is a simple and reliable method for removing colorectal polyps, and for treating in situ and early colorectal polypoid cancers.

Endoscopic polypectomy: outcomes of 467 cases in 20 years

Aim: Endoscopic polypectomy has an important place in the treatment of polyps&#8212;the preliminary lesions of colorectal cancers. This study aimed to discuss the outcomes of endoscopic polypectomy in 467 patients for 692 polyps over the course of 20 years. Materials and methods: The records of 692 endoscopic polypectomies performed in 467 patients between July 1988 and July 2008 were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Patient age ranged from 3 to 85 years (mean: 50.6 years), and 302 of the 467 (64.7%) patients were male. Polypectomy was performed for 692 polyps (mean: 1.5; range: 1-12). The most common polyp location was the rectum (41.5%), polyp diameter ranged between 1 and 40 mm (mean: 6.1 mm), and 451 of the polyps (65.2%) were pedunculated. In 2 (0.4%) patients, major complications developed, but there was no mortality. Histopathologically, 43.8% of the polyps were hyperplastic, 22.8% were adenomatous, 17.1% were mixed, 9.4% were hamartomas, 6.2% were serrated adenomas, and 0.7% were inflammatory polyps. The risk of malignant degeneration was significantly higher in patients with multiple polyps (P < 0.01), right colon polyps (P < 0.01), polyps larger than 10 mm (P < 0.01), sessile polyps (P < 0.01), and adenomatous polyps, mixed polyps, and serrated adenomas (P < 0.05). Of the 26 (5.6%) patients with malignant polyps, 6 in whom in situ and early carcinomas were detected were treated with polypectomy and followed-up with regular examinations. Another 20 patients with invasive carcinomas or familial polyposis were treated with surgery. Conclusion: Flexible endoscopic polypectomy is a simple and reliable method for removing colorectal polyps, and for treating in situ and early colorectal polypoid cancers.

___

  • Altıparmak E, Orhan S, Erkan P, Engin A. Colorectal polyps:
  • The Yüksek Ihtisas experience. Turk J Gastroenterol 2001; 12: 49-52.
  • Colucci PM, Yale SH, Rall CJ. Colorectal polyps. Clin Med Res 2003; 1: 261-2.
  • Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Stürmer T, Hoffmeister M. Case-control study supports extension of surveillance internal after colonoscopic polypectomy to at least 5 yr. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1739-44.
  • Rex DK. Colonoscopy and colorectal cancer prevention. ACG; 2007; 1-6.
  • Corman ML, Brown B, McMullan E. Flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. In: Corman ML, editor. Colon and rectal surgery. New York: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2005. p. 91-127.
  • Consolo P, Luigiano C, Strangio G, Scaffidi MG, Giacobbe G, Di Giuseppe G et al. Efficacy risk factors and complications of endoscopic polypectomy: Ten year experience at a single center. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 2364-9.
  • Nivatvongs S, Forde KA. Diagnostic evaluations-endoscopy: rigid, flexible complications. In: Wolff BG, Fleshmann JW, Beck DE, Beck DE, Pemberton JH, Wexner SD, editors. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. New York: Springer, 2007. p. 57-68.
  • Araujo SE, Alves PR, Habr-Gama A. Role of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 2001; 56: 25-35.
  • Muto T, Sawada T, Sugihara K. Treatment of carcinoma in adenomas. World J Surg 1991; 15: 35-40.
  • Su MY, Ho YP, Hsu CM, Chiu CT, Chen PC, Lien JM et al. How can colorectal neoplasms be treated during colonoscopy? World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 2806-10.
  • Fry R. Management of the malignant polyp. In: Fazio VW, Church JM, Delaney CP, editors. Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2005. p. 327-9.
  • Terzi C. Kolorektal poliplerde kansere yaklaşım. T Klin J Surgery 2004; 9: 65-70.
  • Bond JH. Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 3053-61.
  • Nivatvongs S. Treatment of colorectal adenomas: screening, follow-up and surveillance. In: Fazio VW, Church JM, Delaney CP, editors. Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2005. p. 331-42.
  • Yamaji Y, Mitsushima T, Ikuma H, Watabe H, Okamoto M, Kawabe T et al. Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese. Gut 2004; 53: 568-72.
  • Yamaji Y, Mitsuhama T, Yoshida H, Watabe H, Okamoto M, Wada R et al. The malignant potential of freshly developed colorectal polyps according to age. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 2418-21.
  • Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O’Brien MJ, Levin B et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56: 143-59.
  • Netzer P, Forster C, Biral R, Ruchti C, Neuweiler J, Stauffer E et al. Risk factor of endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps. Gut 1998; 43: 669-74.
  • Erdem L, Akbayır N, Yıldırım S, Köksal HM, Yenice N, Gültekin OS et al. Predictive value of morphologic characteristics in rectosigmoid adenomatous polyps for the probability of synchronous polyps or cancer in the proximal colon. Turk J Gastroenterol 2005; 16: 207-11.
  • Göral V. Kolorektal polipler ve polipozis sendromları. Güncel Gastroenteroloji 2003; 7: 32-40.
  • Higuchi T, Jass JR. My approach to serrated polyps of the colorectum. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57: 682-6.
  • Harvey NT, Ruszkiewicz A. Serrated neoplasia of the colorectum. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 3792-8.
  • Torlakovic E, Skovlund E, Snover DC, Torlakovic G, Nesland JM. Morphologic reappraisal of serrated colorectal polyps. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27: 65-81.
  • Yantiss YK. Serrated colorectal polyps and the serrated neoplastic pathway: Emerging concepts in colorectal carcinogenesis. Current Diag Pathol 2007; 13: 456-66.
  • Lacobuzio-Donahue CA. Gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes. In: Lacobuzio-Donahue CA, Montgomery EA, Goldblum JR, editors. Gastrointestinal and liver pathology. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2005. p. 345-66.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Clinical and pathological features of nodular gastritis in adults

Cenk SÖKMENSÜER, Osman ERSOY, İbrahim Koral ÖNAL, Yusuf BAYRAKTAR, Figen BATMAN, Özlem YÖNEM, Demir Eda ÖNAL, Musa AYDINLI, Özgür HARMANCI, Özgür YENİOVA

Management of thyroid cancer associated with elevated serum thyroglobulin and negative radioiodine

Yavuz KURT, Mehmet Emin ÖNDE, Muammer URHAN, Yavuz NARİN, Onur SILDIROĞLU, Sinan ÇAĞLAYAN

Anti-HAV seroprevalence in Turkish military personnel and its relation with demographic properties

İsmail Yaşar AVCI, Çakır GÜNEY, CAN Polat EYİGÜN, Hanefi Cem GÜL, Yakup Hakan BAŞARAN, Bülent A. BEŞİRBELLİOĞLU, Ömer COŞKUN, Alaaddin PAHSA, Recai OĞUR, Cengiz Han AÇIKEL

Reference value for the ALAD enzyme activity ratio in men based on the improvement of each analytical step of the colorimetric method and the active/non-active lead concept

Hüseyin KAYADİBİ, Mustafa GÜLTEPE, Burhanettin BOLAT

Ectopic intra-abdominal fascioliasis

Taylan Ayşegül ÖZKAN, Ali Ulvi ÖNGÖREN, Arif Hakan DEMİREL, Hüseyin ÜSTÜN, Mustafa DÖNMEZ

Cut-off value of D-dimer in pulmonary thromboembolism and pneumonia

Asiye KANBAY, Ayşegül KARALEZLİ, Selda KAYA, Elif BABAOĞLU, S. Cibali AÇIKGÖZ, H. Canan HASANOĞLU, Derya ÖZTUNA

The effects of adding tramadol to ropivacaine on axillary brachial plexus blockade in uremic patients*

Bayazıt DİKMEN

An algorithm for the treatment of the biliary complications of hepatic hydatid disease

Bülent AYDINLI, Abdullah KISAOĞLU, Gürkan ÖZTÜRK, M. İlhan YILDIRGAN, K. Yalçın POLAT, Mahmut BAŞOĞLU, Durkaya ÖREN, S. Selçuk ATAMANALP

Prevalence of Echinococcus granulosus detected using enzyme immunoassay and abdominal ultrasonography in a group of students staying in a state dormitory in Turkey

Metin KORKMAZ, Gülgün DEMİRPOLAT, Sadık TAMSEL, Tansu YAMAZHAN, Hüsnü PULLUKÇU, Oğuz Reşat SİPAHİ, Bilgin ARDAİ

The risk factors and spread of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in intubated patients in a medical intensive care unit

Gökhan METAN, Yeşim GÜROL, Mehmet YERER, Sesin KOCAGÖZ, Duygu ESEL, Emine ALP, Mehmet DOĞANAY