Hüseyin ŞAHİN, Ayhan AKÖZ, Memet IŞIK, Mücahit EMET

Do characteristics of seriously injured older adults differ from those of their younger counterparts in the emergency department?

To analyze the injury characteristics of younger and older adult trauma victims. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional, observational, and single-center study including both younger adult and geriatric trauma patients. The relationships between the age groups and the number of consultations in the emergency department (ED) were compared with analysis of covariance after adjusting for Injury Severity Score (ISS). Results: The data consisted of 779 patients, 131 (16.8%) of whom were elderly. The intensive care unit admission rate was 7.2%. Our results showed a significantly higher incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, fracture and/or dislocation of the femur, and fracture of the thoracic vertebra in the elderly patients, and acute abdomen, bowel injury, and pelvic fracture in younger adults. After adjusting for ISS and total consultations, the length of stay in the ED was significantly shorter in the elderly compared to the younger adults (115 min vs. 132 min; F = 24.2; P < 0.0001). After controlling for ISS, the total number of consultations among the elderly was significantly lower than that of the younger adults (2.07 ± 1.42 vs. 2.53 ± 1.44; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the characteristics of seriously injured older adults admitted to our ED differ from those of their younger counterparts.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Key words: Elderly, geriatric, trauma, injury, health care quality, length of stay, consultation, outcome, emergency department

Do characteristics of seriously injured older adults differ from those of their younger counterparts in the emergency department?

Keywords:

Key words: Elderly, geriatric, trauma, injury, health care quality, length of stay, consultation, outcome, emergency department,

PDF

___

Binder S. Injuries among older adults: the challenge of optimizing safety and minimizing unintended consequences. Inj Prev 2002; 8: IV2–4.
Doğan H, Canbaz S, Tander B, Pekşen Y, Cantürk F, Oruç NÖ. The prevalence of home injuries among elderly people in Samsun, Turkey, and the influencing factors. Turk J Med Sci 2010; 40: 651–8.
Turkish Statistical Institute. Facts and Figures? 2008. Turkish Statistical Institute, Printing Division: Ankara; 2008. p. 2–3. Aksoydan E. Are developing countries ready for ageing populations? An examination on the socio-demographic, economic and health status of elderly in Turkey. Turk J Geriatrics 2009; 12: 102–9.
Mert E. Use of emergency departments by elderly patients. T J Geriatrics 2006; 9: 70–4.
Ünsal A, Çevik AA, Metintaş S, Arslantaş D, İnan OÇ. Emergency department visits by elder patients. Turk J Geriatrics 2003; 6: 83–8.
Foo CL, Chan KC, Goh HK, Seow E. Profiling acute presenting symptoms of geriatric patients attending an urban hospital emergency department. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2009; 38: 515–
Sanders AB. Care of the elderly in emergency departments: conclusions and recommendations. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 830–
McKevitt EC, Calvert E, Ng A, Simons RK, Kirkpatrick AW, Appleton L et al. Geriatric trauma: resource use and patient outcomes. Can J Surg 2003; 46: 211–5.
Lane P, Sorondo B, Kelly JJ. Geriatric trauma patients-are they receiving trauma center care? Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 244–
Jacobs DG. Special considerations in geriatric injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 2003; 9: 535–9.
Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Committee on Injury Scaling. Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2005 – Update 2008. Manuals. Des Plains, IL, USA: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; 2008.
Bergeron E, Lavoie A, Belcaid A, Ratte S, Clas D. Should patients with isolated hip fractures be included in trauma registries? J Trauma 2005; 58: 793–7.
Covington DL, Maxwell JG, Clancy TV. Hospital resources used to treat the injured elderly at North Carolina trauma centers. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41: 847–52.