Bother index can be used in deciding how the symptom nocturia itself is important
Aim: To report the prevalence of nocturia. Associated risk factors and bother in various age groups (by decade) were evaluated in order to determine the characteristics of individuals who may need medical help. Materials and methods: To estimate the extent to which patients were bothered relative to nocturia in various age groups (by decade), a descriptive figure, the "bother index," was used. The bother index was calculated by dividing the number of individuals reporting a bother score higher than a symptom score by the number of individuals reporting a bother score lower than a symptom score in the same age and sex group. Results: Data from 940 women and 2073 men were analyzed. The overall prevalence of nocturia was 65%, with an increasing proportion in the older groups in both sexes (P < 0.001). In light of the bother index, nocturia was better tolerated in women than in men (0.0271 vs. 0.074, respectively), and patients with a higher frequency of nocturia also reported a higher bother score (P < 0.001). The highest bother index value was seen in the third decade (0.080), and it decreased as the decades progressed. Conclusion: Nocturia is better tolerated in women and elderly populations. The bother index may be a useful indicator of the bother of nocturia and may help in deciding whether an individual with nocturia needs medical help.
Bother index can be used in deciding how the symptom nocturia itself is important
Aim: To report the prevalence of nocturia. Associated risk factors and bother in various age groups (by decade) were evaluated in order to determine the characteristics of individuals who may need medical help. Materials and methods: To estimate the extent to which patients were bothered relative to nocturia in various age groups (by decade), a descriptive figure, the "bother index," was used. The bother index was calculated by dividing the number of individuals reporting a bother score higher than a symptom score by the number of individuals reporting a bother score lower than a symptom score in the same age and sex group. Results: Data from 940 women and 2073 men were analyzed. The overall prevalence of nocturia was 65%, with an increasing proportion in the older groups in both sexes (P < 0.001). In light of the bother index, nocturia was better tolerated in women than in men (0.0271 vs. 0.074, respectively), and patients with a higher frequency of nocturia also reported a higher bother score (P < 0.001). The highest bother index value was seen in the third decade (0.080), and it decreased as the decades progressed. Conclusion: Nocturia is better tolerated in women and elderly populations. The bother index may be a useful indicator of the bother of nocturia and may help in deciding whether an individual with nocturia needs medical help.
___
- Blanker MH, Bohnen AM, Groeneveld FP, Bernsen RM, Prins A, Ruud Bosch JL. Normal voiding patterns and determinants of increased diurnal and nocturnal voiding frequency in elderly men. J Urol 2000; 164: 1201-5.
- Weiss JP, Blaivas JG. Nocturia. J Urol 2000; 163: 5-12.
- van Kerrebroeck P, Abrams P, Chaikin D, Donovan J, Fonda D, Jackson S et al. Th e standardization of terminology in nocturia: report from the standardization sub-committee of the International Continence Study. BJU Int 2002; 90: 11-5.
- Jackson S. Lower urinary tract symptoms and nocturia in men and women: prevalence, etiology and diagnosis. BJU Int 1999; 84: 5-8.
- van Dijk L, Kooij DG, Schellevis FG, Kaptein AA, Boon TA, Wooning M. Nocturia in the Dutch adult population. BJU Int 2004; 93: 1001-4.
- Hald T, Nordling J, Andersen JT, Bilde T, Meyhoff HH, Walter S. A patient weighted symptom score system in the evaluation of uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1991; 138: 59-62.
- Perrin P, Marionneau N, Cucherat M, Taieb C. Relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms frequency assessed by the IPSS and bothersomeness (SPI) among men older than 50 years old. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 601-7.
- Schou J, Poulsen AL, Nordling J. Th e value of a new symptom score (DAN-PSS) in diagnosing uro-dynamic infravesical obstruction in BPH. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1993; 27: 489-92.
- Eckhardt MD, van Venrooij GE, van Melick HH, Boon TA. Prevalence and bothersomeness of lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia and their impact on well-being. J Urol 2001; 166: 563-8.
- Tikkinen KA, Tammela TL, Huhtala H, Auvinen A. Is nocturia equally common among men and women? A population based study in Finland. J Urol 2006; 175: 596-600.
- Liew LC, Tiong HY, Wong ML, Png DC, Tan JK. A population study of nocturia in Singapore. BJU Int 2006; 97: 109-12.
- Asplund R, Aberg HE. Nocturia and health in women aged 40- 64 years. Maturitas 2000; 35: 143-8.
- Asplund R, Aberg H. Health of the elderly with regard to sleep and nocturnal micturition. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992; 10: 98-104.
- Asplund R. Th e nocturnal polyuria syndrome (NPS). Gen Pharmacol 1995; 26: 1203-9.
- Rembratt A, Norgaard JP, Andersson KE. Nocturnal polyuria: an inescapable consequence of aging. Neurourol Urodyn 2001; 20: 460.
- van Haarst EP, Heldeweg EA, Newling DW, Schlatmann TJ. Th e 24-h frequency volume chart in adults reporting no voiding complaints: defi ning reference values and analysing variables. BJU Int 2004; 93: 1257-61.
- Andersson KE. Storage and voiding symptoms:
- pathophysiologic aspects. Urology 2003; 62: 3-10.
- Homma Y, Yamaguchi T, Kondo Y, Horie S, Takahashi S, Kitamura T. Signifi cance of nocturia in the International Prostate Symptom Score for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2002; 167: 172-6.
- Hunskaar S. Epidemiology of nocturia. BJU Int 2005; 96: 4-7.
- Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O’Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK et al. Measuring disease-specifi c health status in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Med Care 1995; 33: 145-55.
- Swithinbank LV, Donovan JL, James MC, Yang Q, Abrams P. Female urinary symptoms: age prevalence in a community dwelling population using a validated questionnaire. Neurourol Urodyn 1998; 16: 432-4.