A novel approach for brachial plexus block

Aim: The line from the midpoint of the sternocleidomastoid muscle to the midpoint of the clavicle was considered the surface projection of the brachial plexus in the supraclavicular region in a previous report using radiological and anatomic techniques. The needle insertion site was the point between the clavicular one-third and cervical two-thirds of this line. The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical efficacy of these suggested landmarks. Materials and methods: Brachial plexus block was performed in 60 healthy adult patients undergoing elective surgery on an upper extremity using the above-mentioned new surface landmarks. Results: The characteristics of the block resemble those in the interscalene technique. Brachial plexus block was performed with a high success rate (98.5%) and minor complications including phrenic nerve palsy (45%), Horner syndrome (15%), and recurrent nerve block (1.6%). No major complication such as pneumothorax or accidental intravascular insertion was observed. Conclusion: The new landmarks were not dependent on patients’ physical features or deeper anatomic structures. The surface landmarks based on bony prominences were defined easily. Brachial plexus block was performed with a high success rate and is considered a safe alternative to the classically described techniques.

A novel approach for brachial plexus block

Aim: The line from the midpoint of the sternocleidomastoid muscle to the midpoint of the clavicle was considered the surface projection of the brachial plexus in the supraclavicular region in a previous report using radiological and anatomic techniques. The needle insertion site was the point between the clavicular one-third and cervical two-thirds of this line. The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical efficacy of these suggested landmarks. Materials and methods: Brachial plexus block was performed in 60 healthy adult patients undergoing elective surgery on an upper extremity using the above-mentioned new surface landmarks. Results: The characteristics of the block resemble those in the interscalene technique. Brachial plexus block was performed with a high success rate (98.5%) and minor complications including phrenic nerve palsy (45%), Horner syndrome (15%), and recurrent nerve block (1.6%). No major complication such as pneumothorax or accidental intravascular insertion was observed. Conclusion: The new landmarks were not dependent on patients’ physical features or deeper anatomic structures. The surface landmarks based on bony prominences were defined easily. Brachial plexus block was performed with a high success rate and is considered a safe alternative to the classically described techniques.

___

  • Winnie AP. Interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 455-66. 2. Winnie AP, Collins VJ. The subclavian perivascular technique of brachial plexus anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1964; 25: 353-63. 3. Raj PP, Montgomery SJ, Nettles D, Jankins MI. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: A new approach. Anesth Analg 1973; 52: 897-902. 4. De Jong RH. Axillary block of the brachial plexus. Anesthesiology 1961; 17: 215-25. 5. Partrige BL, Katz J, Benirschke K. Functional anatomy of the brachial plexus sheath: Implications for anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1987; 66: 743-7.
  • Kapral S, Greher M, Huber G, Willschke H, Kettner S, Kdolsky R et al. Ultrasonographic guidance improves the success rate of interscalene brachial plexus blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008; 33: 253-8.
  • Sites BD, Spence BC, Gallagher JD, Beach M. On the edge of the ultrasound screen: regional anesthesiologists diagnosing nonneural pathology. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006; 31: 555-62.
  • Apan A, Baydar Ş, Yılmaz S, Uz A, Tekdemir İ, Güney Ş et al. Surface landmarks of brachial plexus: ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for supraclavicular approach with anatomical correlation. Eur J Ultrasound 2001; 13: 191-6. 9. Kulenkampff D. Die anästhesierung des plexus brachialis. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1912; 38: 1678-80.
  • Hickey R, Garland TA, Rammamurthy S. Subclavian perivascular block: Influence of location of paresthesia. Anesth Analg 1989; 68: 767-71.
  • Moorthy SS, Schmidt SI, Dierdorf SF, Rosenfeld SH, Anagnostou JM. A supraclavicular lateral paravascular approach for brachial plexus regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1991; 72: 241-4.
  • Fleck JW, Moorthy SS, Daniel J, Dierdorf SF. A comparison of the supraclavicular paravascular and axillary approaches. Reg Anesth 1994; 19: 14-7.
  • Klaastad Ø, Smedby Ö. The supraclavicular lateral paravascular approach for brachial plexus regional anesthesia: a stimulation study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 442-6.
  • Kapral S, Krafft P, Eibenberger K, Fitzgerald R, Gosch M, Weinstabl C. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 507-13.
  • Pippa P. Brachial plexus block using a new subclavian perivascular technique: the proximal cranial needle approach. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000; 17: 120-5.
  • Russon KE, Herrick MJ, Moriggl B, Messner HJ, Dixon A, Harrop-Griffiths W, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus block: assessment of the needle angle needed to enter the spinal canal. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 43-5.
  • Vongvises P, Panijayanond T. A parascalene technique of brachial plexus anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1979; 58: 267-73.
  • Dupre LJ, Danel V, Legrand JJ, Stieglitz P. Surface landmarks for supraclavicular block of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg 1982; 61: 25-31.
  • Dalens B, Vaneuville G, Tanguy A. A new parascalene approach to the brachial plexus in children: comparison with the supraclavicular approach. Anesth Analg 1987; 66: 1261-71.
  • Pham-Dang C, Gunst JP, Gouin F, Poirier P, Touchais S, Meunier JF et al. A novel supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 111-6.
  • Brown DL, Cahill DR, Brindenbaugh LD. Supraclavicular nerve block: anatomic analysis of a method to prevent pneumothorax. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 530-4.
  • Klaastadt Ø, VadeBoncouer TR, Tillung T, Smedby O. An evaluation of the supraclavicular plumb-bob technique for brachial plexus block by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 862-7.
  • Nyugen HC, Fath E, Wirtz S, Bey T. Transscalene brachial plexus block: a new posteriolateral approach for brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 872-5.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The effects of adding tramadol to ropivacaine on axillary brachial plexus blockade in uremic patients*

Bayazıt DİKMEN

Cut-off value of D-dimer in pulmonary thromboembolism and pneumonia

Asiye KANBAY, Ayşegül KARALEZLİ, Selda KAYA, Elif BABAOĞLU, S. Cibali AÇIKGÖZ, H. Canan HASANOĞLU, Derya ÖZTUNA

A novel approach for brachial plexus block

Ünase BÜYÜKKOÇAK, Hülya BAŞAR, Alpaslan APAN, Şaziye ŞAHİN

The effects of adding tramadol to ropivacaine on axillary brachial plexus blockade in uremic patients

Mehmet GAMLI, Eyüp HORASANLI, Bayazıt DİKMEN, Dilşen ÖRNEK, Aydın SELÇUK, Melekşah PEKEL

Acute pancreatitis as an atypical presentation of Henoch-Schonlein purpura and cystic fibrosis

Beril DİLBER, Ayşe AKSOY, Mukaddes KALYONCU, Enbiya DİLBER, Erol ERDUMAN, Murat ÇAKIR

Ectopic intra-abdominal fascioliasis

Taylan Ayşegül ÖZKAN, Ali Ulvi ÖNGÖREN, Arif Hakan DEMİREL, Hüseyin ÜSTÜN, Mustafa DÖNMEZ

Endoscopic polypectomy: outcomes of 467 cases in 20 years

Fuat ŞENTÜRK, M. İlhan YILDIRGAN, Mahmut BAŞOĞLU, S. Selçuk ATAMANALP, Mecit KANTARCI, Gürkan ÖZTÜRK, Nesrin GÜRSAN

The efficacy of quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) in the diagnosis of prenatal aneuploidy

Serpil AYDOĞMUŞ, Hüseyin Levent KESKİN, Emine ÇELEN, Semra Baykal GÖKÇE, Ayşe Filiz AVŞAR

Anti-HAV seroprevalence in Turkish military personnel and its relation with demographic properties

İsmail Yaşar AVCI, Çakır GÜNEY, CAN Polat EYİGÜN, Hanefi Cem GÜL, Yakup Hakan BAŞARAN, Bülent A. BEŞİRBELLİOĞLU, Ömer COŞKUN, Alaaddin PAHSA, Recai OĞUR, Cengiz Han AÇIKEL

Does employment status influence obesity prevalence among females? A comparative study from Ankara, Turkey

Dilek ASLAN, Celile HATİPOĞLU, Zeynep ALTIN, Necmiye BEYDAĞ