Acute Toxicity of Fluazifop-P-Butyl (Herbicide) on Oreochromis niloticus(L., 1754) Larvae (Acknowledgements)

Bu çalışmada, Çukurova Bölgesi'nde tarım alanlarında yaygın olarak kullanılan Fluazifop-p-butyl (herbisit)'in Oreochromis niloticus (L.,1754) yavruları üzerine akut toksik etkisi araştırılmıştır. Laboratuvarda 25±2oC'de yürütülen çalışmada, statik biyodeney yöntemi kullanılmış; deneysel sonuçlar log-logistic model istatistik analiz yöntemiyle incelenmiş ve 24 saatlik akut LC50 değeri hesaplanmıştır. Akut toksik etkisi araştırılan Fluazifop-p-butyl (herbisit)'in, Oreochromis niloticus (L.,1754) yavrularına ait 24 saatlik öldürücü konsantrasyon değeri, LC50 1.94±0.02 mgl-1 olarak hesaplanmıştır

Fluazifop-P-Butyl (Herbisit)'in Oreochromis niloticus(L.,1754) Yavruları Üzerine Akut Toksik Etkisinin Araştırılması

In this study, aquatic environments adversely impact, which may occur in order to obtain information about the acute toxicity Fluazifop-p-butyl (herbicide) which is widespread used in agriculture in the Çukurova Region, has been researched using the larvae Oreochromis niloticus (L., 1754). In the present study, the test fish O. niloticus larvae (average weight 1.88±0.6 g, average length 5.04±0.5 cm) were obtained from the Çukurova University Fisheries Faculty Freshwater Fish Research and Application Station. In the experiment, five different concentrations along with the control group were used making a total of 12 aquariums. Each experiment was repeated two times. In this research, the static method of the acute bioassay methods was applied. The experiments were conducted under laboratory conditions at 25±2 oC. The results have been predicted with the dose-response data and were fitted with a log-logistic model by using R 3.0 statistical computation environment and DRC library. The 24-h acute LC value was determined. According to the conclusions, acute toxic effects investigated Fluazifop-p-butyl (herbicide), the 24-h LC50 acute toxic lethal concentration value for Oreochromis niloticus (L., 1754) larvae was calculated to be 1.94±0.02 mgl-1. These results indicate that low levels of Fluazifop-p-butyl (herbicide) in the aquatic environment may have a significant effect on the O. niloticus populations

PDF

___

Atay, D. and Rad, F. 1998. Balıkçılık amenajmanı. Ankara Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yay.: 1500, Ders Kitabı: 454, Ankara Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Halkla İlişkiler ve Yayın Ünitesi, Ankara, 182 s.
European Standard EN 14 757, 2005: Water Quality— Sampling of Fish with Multimesh Gill nets, CEN TC 230, March 2005.
Erzini, K., Gonçalves, J.M.S., Bentes, L., Moutopoulos, D.K., Hernando Casal, J.A., Soriguer, M.C., Puente, E., Errazkin, L. A., and Stergiou, K. I. 2006. Size selectivity of trammel nets in southern European small-scale fisheries. Fisheries Research, 79: 183-201. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2006.03.004
Fujimori, Y. and Tokai, T. 2001. Estimation of gillnet selectivity curve by maximum likelihood method. Fisheries Science, 67(4): 644-654. doi:10.1046/j.1444-2906.2001.00301.x
Hamley, J.M. and Regier, H.A. 1973. Direct estimates of gillnet selectivity to walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 30: 817–830. doi: 10.1139/f73-137
Hamley, J.M. 1975. Review of gillnet selectivity. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 32: 1943- 1969.doi: 10.1139/f75-233
Hamley, J.M. 1980. Sampling with gill nets. In: T. Bachiel and R. L. Welcomme (Eds), Guidelines for Sampling Fish in Inland Waters. Technical Paper 33, FAO, European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission, Rome, pp. 37–53.
Huse, I., Løkkeborg, S., and Soldal, A.V. 2000. Relative selectivity in trawl, longline and gillnet fisheries for cod and haddock. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57:1271–1282. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.00813
Kalaycı, F. and Yeşilçiçek, T. 2012. Investigation of the selectivity of trammel nets used in red mullet (Mullus barbatus) fishery in the Eastern Black Sea, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 12: 937-945. doi: 10.4194/1303-2712-v12_4_21
King, M.G. 2007. Fisheries biology, assessment and management. Blackwell Publishing Editorial Offices, Singapore, 382 pp.
Kolding, J. and Skålevik, Å. 2011. PasGear 2. A database package for experimental or artisanal fishery data. Version 2.5. available at http://www.imr.no/forskning/bistandsarbeid/nansis /pasgear2/en
McCombie, A.M. and Fry, F.E.J. 1960. Selectivity of gill nets for lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 89(2): 176–184. doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1960)89[176:SOGNFL] 2.0.CO;2
Millar, R.B. 1992. Estimating the size-selectivity of fishing gear by conditioning on the total catch. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87: 962-968. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1992.10476250
Millar, R.B. and Holst, R. 1997. Estimation of gillnet and hook selectivity using log-linear models. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 54: 471–477. doi: 10.1006/jmsc.1996.0196
Millar, R.B. and Fryer, R.J. 1999. Estimating the sizeselection curves of towed gears, traps, nets and hooks. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9: 89-116. doi: 10.1023/A:1008838220001
Özekinci, U., Begburs, C.R., and Tenekecioglu, E. 2003. An investigation of gill nets selectivity used in Capoeta capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) and Capoeta trutta (Heckel, 1843) (Siraz fish) fishery in Keban Dam Lake. Ege University, Ege Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 20: 473-479.
Pet, J.S., Pet-Soede, C., and Densen, W.L.T. 1995. Comparison of methods for the estimation of gillnet selectivity to tilapia, cyprinids and other species of Sri Lankan reservoir fish. Fisheries Research, 24: 141- 164. doi: 10.1016/0165-7836(94)00364-3
Petriki, O., Erzini, K., Moutopoulos, D.K., and Bobori, D.C. 2014. Gillnet selectivity for freshwater fish species in three lentic systems of Greece. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 30: 1016-1027. doi: 10.1111/jai.12476
Psuty, I. and Borowski, W. 1997. The selectivity of gill nets to bream (Abramis brama L.) fished in the Polish part of the Vistula Lagoon. Fisheries Research, 32: 249- 261. doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(97)00056-8
Reddin, D.G. 1986. Effects of different mesh sizes on gillnet catches of Atlantic salmon in Newfoundland. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 6: 209-215. doi:10.1577/1548- 8659(1986)6<209:EODMSO>2.0.CO;2
Reis, E.G. and Pawson, M.G. 1992. Determination of gillnet selectivity for bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) using commercial catch data. Fisheries Research, 13: 173–187. doi: 10.1016/0165-7836(92)90025-O
Santos, M.N.D., Gaspar, M., Monteiro, C.C., and Erzini, K. 2003. Gill net selectivity for European hake Merluccius merluccius from southern Portugal: implications for fishery management. Fisheries Science, 69: 873–882. doi: 10.1046/j.1444- 2906.2003.00702.x
Siegel, S., Castellan Jr., N.J., 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill International Editions, Statistics Series, second ed., p. 399.
Spangler, G.R. and Collins J.J. 1992. Lake Huron fish community structure based on gill-net catches corrected for selectivity and encounter probability. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 12: 585-597. doi:10.1577/1548- 8675(1992)012<0585:LHFCSB>2.3.CO;2
Turan, D., Kottelat, M., Ekmekçi, F.G., and Imamoğlu H.O. 2006. A review of Capoeta tinca, with descriptions of two new species from Turkey (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 113(2): 421-436.
Van Densen, W.L.T. 1987. Gillnet selectivity to pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.), and perch, Perca fluviatilis L., caught mainly wedged. Aquaculture Research, 18: 95–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2109.1987.tb00127.x
Winters, G.H. and Wheeler, J.P. 1990. Direct and indirect estimation of gillnet selection curves of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus harengus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47, 460- 470. doi: 10.1139/f90-050