SELECTION OF ALFALFA (Medicago sativa L.) HYBIRD PARENTS AND HETEROSIS ANALYSIS OF F1 HYBRIDS

SELECTION OF ALFALFA (Medicago sativa L.) HYBIRD PARENTS AND HETEROSIS ANALYSIS OF F1 HYBRIDS

Heterosis is an effective way to increase yield and improve quality in alfalfa breeding. The key issue for efficiently use of heterosis is to identify parents having potential for producing hybrid combinations with higher performance. This study aimed to analyze genetic distance between the 48 alfalfa accessions, and combine different hybrid combinations. The results showed that the mating ability of the hybrid combination in which both parents are tetraploid is greater than that in which both parents are diploid or the hybrid combination with different parental ploidy. When the different ploidy levels of parents, the mating ability of alfalfa hybrid combination with diploid as female parent is better than that of alfalfa hybrid combination with tetraploid as female parent. he hybrid combination of diploid alfalfa as a female parent with tetraploid as a male parent is more heterosis than the hybrid combination of diploid as a male parent. Moreover, CYK2xHH10 with high heterosis and CYK4xHH10 with high the relative seed setting rate should be possible to breed high yielding hybrid, which could be used as candidate materials for further research.

___

  • Li-Jun, X. U., G. X. Yang, B. R. Chen, X. P. Xin, Wuenqi, Qinggele and S. S. Zhu. 2013. Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional values of different alfalfa species and varieties. Pratacultural Science 30(04): 566-570.
  • Groose, R. W., L. E. Talbert, W. P. Kojis and E. T. Bingham. 1989. Progressive Heterosis in Autotetraploid Alfalfa: Studies Using Two Types of Inbreds. Crop Science 29(5). Labroo, M. R., A. J. Studer and J. E. Rutkoski. 2021.Heterosis and Hybrid Crop Breeding: A Multidisciplinary Review. Front Genet 12: 643-761.
  • Herrmann, D., S. Flajoulot, P. Barre, C. Huyghe and B. Julier. 2017 . Comparison of morphological traits and molecular markers to analyse diversity and structure of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution: 1-14.
  • Geng, X., Y. Qu, Y. Jia, S. He, Z. Pan, L. Wang and X. Du. 2021. Assessment of heterosis based on parental genetic distance estimated with SSR and SNP markers in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). BMC Genomics 22(1): 123.
  • Jordan, D. R., Y. Tao, I. D. Godwin, R. G. Henzell, M. Cooper and C. L. McIntyre .2003. Prediction of hybrid performance in grain sorghum using RFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 106(3): 559-567.
  • Han, Z., Q. Han, Y. Xia, X. Geng, K. Du, J. Yang and X. Kang .2020 . Construction of a breeding parent population of Populus tomentosa based on SSR genetic distance analysis. Sci Rep 10(1): 18573.
  • Mukri, G., M. S. Patil, B. N. Motagi, J. S. Bhat, C. Singh, S. P. Jeevan Kumar, R. N. Gadag, N. C. Gupta and J. Simal-Gandara. 2022. Genetic variability, combining ability and molecular diversity-based parental line selection for heterosis breeding in field corn (Zea mays L.).Mol Biol Rep.
  • Annicchiarico, P., Y. Wei, E. C. Brummer and O. A. Rognli. 2017. Genetic structure of putative heterotic populations of alfalfa. Plant Breeding 136(5): 671-678. He, C., Z. L. Xia, T. A. Campbell and G. R. Bauchan. 2009. Development and Characterization of SSR Markers and Their Use to Assess Genetic Relationships among Alfalfa Germplasms.Crop Science 49(6): 2176-2186.
  • Rui, M. A., T. Yli-Mattila and S. Pulli. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among genotypes of worldwide collection of spring and winter ryes (Secale cereale L.) determined by RAPD-PCR markers. Hereditas.
  • Stewart, C. and L. E. Via. 1993. A rapid CTAB DNA isolation technique useful for RAPD fingerprinting and other PCR applications. Biotechniques 14(5): 748-750. Yun-Tana, W. U., F. L. Shi, X. L. Xue, F. L. Shi and N. Cui. 2015 . Correlation Analysis of SSR Genetic Distance and Heterosis on Alfalfa. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources.
  • Qian, Q. A., B. My, W. A. Chong, A. Jw, A. Ql, A. Jt, Z. C. Lin and F. B. Zhen. 2021 . Analysis of leaf morphology variation and genetic diversity via SRAP markers for near-threatened plant Acer truncatum - ScienceDirect. Global Ecology and Conservation.
  • Rongxi, S., L. Furong, H. Ping and Z. Yongqi. 2016. Moderate Genetic Diversity and Genetic Differentiation in the Relict Tree Liquidambar formosana Hance Revealed by Genic Simple Sequence Repeat Markers. Frontiers in Plant Science 7.
  • Singh, N., D. R. Choudhury, G. Tiwari, A. K. Singh, S. Kumar, K. Srinivasan, R. K. Tyagi, A. D. Sharma, N. K. Singh and R. Singh.2016. Genetic diversity trend in Indian rice varieties: an analysis using SSR markers. BMC Genetics 17.
  • Kumar, R. V., Y. K. Tripathi, P. Shukla, S. P. Ahlawat and V. K. Gupta. 2009. Genetic diversity and relationships among germplasm of Jatropha curcas L. revealed by RAPDs.Trees 23(5): 1075-1079.
  • Huang, C. Q., G. D. Liu, C. J. Bai, W. Q. Wang and J. Tang . 2014. Application of SRAP markers in the identification of Stylosanthes guianensis hybrids. Molecular Biology Reports 41(9): 5923-5929.
  • Boeven, P., Y. Zhao, P. Thorwarth, F. Liu and T. Würschum. 2020. Negative dominance and dominance-by-dominance epistatic effects reduce grain-yield heterosis in wide crosses in wheat. Science Advances 6(24): eaay4897.
  • Jing, S., P. Kryger, B. Markussen and B. Boelt. 2021. Pollination and Plant Reproductive Success of Two Ploidy Levels in Red Clover (Trifolium pratense L.).Front Plant Sci 12: 720069.
  • Wang, G. Castiglione ,S. Zhang, J. 1994. Hybrid rice (oryza sativa l.): identification and parentage determination by rapd fingerprinting. Plant Cell Reports, 14(2-3), 112-115.
  • Jagosz, B. 2011. The relationship between heterosis and genetic distances based on RAPD and AFLP markers in carrot. Plant Breeding 130(5): 574-579.
  • Stupar, S. 2007. Allele-Specific Expression Patterns Reveal Biases and Embryo-Specific Parent-of-Origin Effects in Hybrid Maize. Plant Cell 19(8): 2391-2402.
  • Wang, H. Chen, F. , Duan, L., Ye, Y. 2016. The crossability and progeny ploidyidentification of hybridization among the heteroploidincrape myrtle.Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (03):291-295.
  • Rao, L. Yang,H. Guo,H. Duan,H. Chen, Y. 2014. AFLP Analysis of Genetic Differences amongAln aus with Different Ploidies. Bulletin of Botanical Research ,34(06):803-809.
Turkish Journal Of Field Crops-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-1111
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1996
  • Yayıncı: Tarla Bitkileri Bilimi Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

A BREEDING STUDY TO DEVELOP EARLY MATURING SOYBEAN CROSSES SUITABLE FOR DOUBLE CROPPING

Aliye YILDIRIM, Emre İLKER, Doç. Dr. Sıdıka EKREN, İlkay YAVAŞ, Dünya ISAYEVA, Özer Hakan BAYRAKTAR

CHANGE IN FORAGE QUALITY OF WHOLE PLANT, LEAF AND STEM ACCORDING TO SOWING AND HARVESTING PERIODS IN Atriplex nitens SCHKUHR GROWN WITHOUT FERTILIZER

Süleyman TEMEL, Bilal KESKİN, Zeynep GÜNER

EFFECT OF PLANT DENSITY ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PEANUT (Arachis hypogaea L.) CULTIVARS

Mustafa YILMAZ, David Lindley JORDAN

SELECTION OF ALFALFA (Medicago sativa L.) HYBIRD PARENTS AND HETEROSIS ANALYSIS OF F1 HYBRIDS

Shi RURU, Jie YANG, Yanting YANG, Zhang YUTONG, Fengling SHİ

GRAIN YIELD AND NUTRITIONAL QUALITY OF DIFFERENT RYE GENOTYPES

Uğur BAŞARAN, Erdem GÜLÜMSER, Yusuf Murat KARDEŞ, Medine ÇOPUR DOĞRUSÖZ, Hanife MUT

Yield and Fiber Quality Characteristics of Some Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Cultivars Grown in the Southeastern Anatolian Conditions

Ramazan ASLAN, Yusuf Ziya AYGÜN, Mehmet MERT

GENETIC VARIABILITY AND DIVERSITY OF UPLAND RICE LANDRACES

Suwansa CHUCHERT, Charassri NUALSRİ, Watcharin SOONSUWON

EXAMINATION OF AGRO-PHYSIOLOGICAL TRAITS OF DIFFERENT CULTIVARS OF MAIZE (Zea Mays) WITH LEAF AND EAR TOPPING

Eshagh HOJATIPOUR, Hamid Reza MIRI, Barmak JAFARI HAGHIGHI, Hamid Reza EBRAHIMI, Abdolreza JAFARI

COMPARISON OF SYNTHETIC HEXAPLOID WHEAT LINES FOR RESISTANCE TO ROOT ROT (Fusarium spp)

İsmet BAŞER, Feyza TAHAN ÇAY, Damla BALABAN GÖÇMEN

Comparison of Ammi, Parametric and Non-Parametric Models in Identifying High-Yielding and Stable Oilseed Rape Genotypes

Hassan AMİRİ OGHAN, Behnam BAKHSHİ, Valiollah RAMEEH, Abolfazl FARAJİ, Abdolhossein ASKARİ, Hamid Reza FANAEİ