EFFECTS OF VARIABLE NITROGEN SOURCE AND RATE ON LEAF AREA INDEX AND TOTAL DRY MATTER ACCUMULATION IN MAIZE (Zea mays L.) GENOTYPES UNDER CALCAREOUS SOILS

EFFECTS OF VARIABLE NITROGEN SOURCE AND RATE ON LEAF AREA INDEX AND TOTAL DRY MATTER ACCUMULATION IN MAIZE (Zea mays L.) GENOTYPES UNDER CALCAREOUS SOILS

Leaf area index (LAI) and total dry matter are important growth and yield-determining factors in maize (Zea mays L.). Field experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of different N-fertilizer sources [urea, calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and ammonium sulphate (AS)] and rates (50, 100, 150 and 200 kg ha-1) on mean single leaf area (MSLA), number of leaves plant-1 (NLPP), LAI and total dry matter (TDM) of maize genotypes “Local cultivars (Azam and Jalal) vs. hybrid (Pioneer-3025)”. The experiment was conducted at the Agriculture Research Farm of The University of Agriculture Peshawar during summer 2008-10. The results indicated that all the experimental plots treated with N produced higher MSLA, NLPP, LAI and TDM than control (N not applied). The MSLA, NLPP, LAI and TDM increased with higher N rates (150 and 200 kg N ha1). Application of CAN and AS produced higher MSLA, NLPP, LAI and TDM than urea in the 1st year, but no significant differences were observed in the 2nd year. The hybrid (P-3025) produced higher MSLA, NLPP, LAI and TDM than Azam and Jalal. The increase in MSLA and NLPP showed positive relationship with LAI. The TDM increased with increase in LAI. Application of N either as CAN or AS at the rate of 200 kg ha-1 was recommended for the high yielding hybrid maize but 150 kg N ha-1 was most suitable for the low yielding local cultivars in the study area

___

  • bayomi, Y., A. Arijenja, and I.A. Kolawole. 2006. Comparative leaf growth and grain yield reponses of hybrid and open pollinated maize genotypes to nitrogen fertilizers application. Agrosearch. 8(1): 13-25.
  • Aliu, S., S. Fetahu, A. Salillari, and S. Kaçiu. 2009. Genetic Variability of some Maize Inbred Lines (Zea mays L.) in Agroecological Conditions of Kosovo. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj 37: 209-214.
  • Amanullah, A.Z. Khan, A. Jan, and Z. Shah. 2013. Foliar application of nitrogen at different growth stages influences the phenology, growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Soil & Environment. 32(2): 135-140.
  • Amanullah, M. Asif, and L.K. Almas. 2012. Agronomic efficiency and profitability of P-fertilizers applied at different planting densities of maize in northwest Pakistan. J. Plant Nutr. 35: 331-341.
  • Amanullah and P. Shah. 2011. Nitrogen rates and its time of application influence dry matter partitioning and yield in maize planted at low and high densities. J. Plant Nutr. 34: 224-242.
  • Amanullah, L.K. Almas and P. Shah. 2010a. Timing and rate of nitrogen application influence profitability of maize planted at low and high densities in Northwest Pakistan. Agron. J. 102: 575-579.
  • Amanullah, M. Asif, K. Nawab and Z. Shah. 2010b. Impact of planting density and p-fertilizer source on the growth analysis of maize. Pak. J. Bot. 42: 2349-2357.
  • Amanullah, R.A. Khattak and S.K. Khalil. 2009a. Effects of plant density and N on phenology and yield of maize. J. Plant Nutr.. 32: 245-259.
  • Amanullah, K.B. Marwat and P. Shah. 2009b. Nitrogen levels and its time of application influence leaf area, height and biomass of maize planted at low and high density. Pak. J. Bot. 41: 761-768.
  • Amanullah, H. Rahman, Z. Shah and P. Shah. 2008. Effects of plant density and N on growth dynamics, light interception and yield of maize. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 54: 401-411.
  • Amanullah, K. Nawab and A. Ali. 2007. Response of specific leaf area (SLA), leaf area index (LAI) and leaf area ratio (LAR) of maize (Zea mays L.) to plant density, rate and timing of nitrogen application. World Appl. Sci. J. 2: 235- 243.
  • Azadgoleh, M.A.E., and Z. Kazmi. 2007. A study of the planting pattern and density effects on yield and physiological growth parameters in two corn cultivars. Ecology, Envi. Conser. 13: 467-472.
  • Baligar, V. C., N. K. Fageria, and Z. L. He. 2001. Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 32: 921– 950.
  • Boogaard, V.R., E.J. Veneklaas, J. Peacock, and H. Lambers. 1996. Yield and water use of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in a Mediterranean environment: effects of water availability and sowing density. Plant Soil. 181: 251–262.
  • Carvalho, E.V., F.S. Afférri, J.M. Peluzio, M.A. Dotto, and L.L. Cancellier, 2012. Nitrogen use efficiency in corn (Zea mays L) genotypes under different conditions of nitrogen and seeding date. Maydica. 57: 43-48.
  • Chien, S.H., M.M. Gearhart and S. Villagarcı. 2011. Comparison of ammonium sulfate with other nitrogen and sulfur fertilizers in increasing crop production and minimizing environmental impact: a review. Soil Sci. 176: 327-335.
  • Fageria, N.K., A. Moreira, and A.M. Coelho. 2011. Yield and yield components of upland rice as influenced by nitrogen sources. J. Plant Nutr. 34: 361-370.
  • Fageria, N.K., V.C. Baligar and Y. C. Li. 2008. The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century. J. Plant Nutr. 31: 1121-1157.
  • Fageria, N. K., V. C. Baligar, and R. B. Clark. 2006. Physiology of Crop Production. New York: The Haworth Press.
  • Frank, K.W., R.E. Gaussoin, T.P. Riordan, R.C. Shearman, J.D. Fry, E.D. Miltner, and P.G. Johnson. 2004. Nitrogen rate and mowing height effects on turf-type buffalo grass. Crop Sci. 44:1615-1621.
  • Gehl, R. J., J. P. Schmidt, L. D. Maddux, and W. B. Gordon. 2005. Corn yield response to nitrogen rate and timing in sandy irrigated soils. Agron. J. 97: 1230-1238.
  • Havlin, J.H., J.D. Beaton, S.L. Tisdale, and W.L. Nelson, 2009. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. 7th Edition, PHI Learning, Private Limited, New Delhi, India.
  • Harold, M.V.E., B.K.J. Sogbedji, J. Melkonian, R.S. Dharmakeerthi, H. Dadfar, and I. Tan. 2006. Nitrogen Management under Maize in Humid Regions: The 18th World Congress of Soil Science held on July 9-15, 2006) at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Hokmalipour, S., M.S. Janagard, M.H. Darbandi, F.P. Ashenaee, M. Hasanzadeh, M.S. Seiedi, and R. Shabani, 2010. Comparison of agronomical nitrogen use efficiency in three cultivars of corn as affected by nitrogen fertilizer levels. World Appl. Sci. J. 8: 1168-1174.
  • Kahabka, J. E., H. M. Van, E. J. McClenahan, and W. J. Cox. 2004. Spatial Analysis of Maize Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer in Central New York. Prec. Agric. 5: 463-476.
  • Kurtz, C.O., 2004. The influence of organic manure on growth and yield components of maize in South Asia. Crop Sci. Res. 20: 421 – 426.
  • Lemerle, D., G.S., Gill, C.E. Murphy, S.R. Walker, R.D. Cousens, S. Mokhtari, S.J. Peltzer, R. Coleman, and D.J. Luckett. 2001. Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds. Australian J. Agric. Res. 52: 527–548.
  • Luque, S.F., A.G. Cirilo and M.E. Otegui. 2006. Genetic gains in grain yield and related physiological attributes in Argentine maize hybrids. Field Crops Res. 95: 383-397.
  • Lloyd, A., J. Webb, J. R. Archer and R S. Bradley. 1997. Urea as a nitrogen fertilizer for cereals . The J. Agric. Sci. 128: 263- 271.
  • Mkhabela, M.S., M.S. Makhabela and P. Shikhulu. 2001. Response of maize cultivars to different levels of N application in Swaziland. Proceedings of 7th Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference. 11th to 15th February, 2001. pp: 377-381.
  • Mortvedt, J. J., L. S. Murphy, and R. H. Follett. 2001. Fertilizer technology and application. Willoughby,OH: Meister Publishing Co.
  • Okalebo, J.R., C.O. Othieno P.L. Woomer, N.K. Karanja, J.R.M. Semoka, .A. Bekunda, D.N. Mugendi, R.M. Muasya, A. Bationo and E.J. Mukhwana. 2006. Available technologies to replenish soil fertility in East Africa Nutr. Cycl. Agro. 76: 153-170.
  • Oscar, R.V., and M. Tollennar, 2006. Effect of genotype, nitrogen, plant density and row spacing on the area-per-leaf profile in maize. Agron. J. 98: 94-99.
  • Plaster, E. J. 1992. Soil Science and Management, New York: Delmar Publishers Inc.
  • Rahman, M. and Y. Koentjoro, 2011. Genetic variation and agronomic traits associated with nitrogen use efficiency in maize. J. Nature Stud. 9: 47-52.
  • Richards, R.A., G.J. Rebetzke, A.G. Condon, and A.F. van Herwaarden. 2002. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Sci. 42: 111–121.
  • Sas, K.M. 2006. Effects of different N sources on growth and yield of sweet potato in the tropics. Fertilizer and Soil Fertility Research.6: 321–326.
  • Sinclair, T.R. and C.T. de Wit, 1975. Photosynthate and nitrogen requirements for seed production by various crops. Sci. 189: 565-567.
  • Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie and D.A. Deekey, 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach, 3rd edition. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc. New York.
  • Subedi, K.D., and B.L.Ma. 2005. Ear position, leaf area and contribution of individual leaf to grain yield in conventional and leafy maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 45: 2246-2257.
  • Terman, G. L. 1979. Volatilization losses of nitrogen as ammonia from surface-applied fertilizers, organic amendments, and crop residues. Adv. Agron. 31: 189-223.
  • Wang, X., W.B. Hoogmoed, D. Cai, U.D. Perdok and O. Oenema. 2007. Crop residue, manure and fertilizer in dryland maize under reduced tillage in northern China: II nutrient balances and soil fertility. Nutr. Cycl. Agro. 79: 17- 34.
  • Wu, L., R. Green, G. Klein, J.S. Hartin and D.W. Burger. 2010. Nitrogen source and rate influence on tall fescue quality and nitrate leaching in a Southern California lawn. Agron. J. 102: 31-38.